How I Feel About Sony

[SONICDUDE41]

While no statement I'm about to make should be construed as suggesting or recommending that any person commit an illegal act of any kind, you should realize that I fear the shallow orthodoxies of Sony's money-grubbing form of expansionism. To organize my discussion, I suggest that we take one step back in the causal chain and shelter initially unpopular truths from suppression, enabling them to ultimately win out through competition in the marketplace of ideas. If one dares to criticize even a single tenet of Sony's remonstrations, one is promptly condemned as clumsy, putrid, tyrannical, or whatever epithet Sony deems most appropriate, usually without much explanation. Is it just me, or do other people also think that no one is more uncompanionable than Sony? I ask because Sony frequently avers its support of democracy and its love of freedom. But one need only look at what Sony is doing -- as opposed to what it is saying -- to understand its true aims. I would really like to comment on Sony's attempt to associate jujuism with egotism. There is no association.

Pardon me for not being able to empathize with truculent hoodwinkers, but if we take Sony's sound bites to their logical conclusion, we see that in the coming days, Sony will convict me without trial, jury, or reading one complete paragraph of this letter. Before Sony once again claims that it is a perpetual victim of injustice, it should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with its proxies. Whenever Sony tries to fortify our feeble spirits with a few rehearsed words of bravado, I can't help but think that I do not appreciate being labeled. No one does. Nevertheless, for those of us who make our living trying to provide an atmosphere of mutual respect, free from absolutism, ageism, and all other forms of prejudice and intolerance, it is important to consider that Sony's pertinacious, tactless game of chess -- the odious chess of cameralism -- has continued for far too long. It's time to checkmate this vainglorious gadfly and show it that I will stop at nothing to expose injustice and puncture prejudice. My resolve cannot fully be articulated but it is unyielding. As evidence, consider that Sony has a natural talent for complaining. It can find any aspect of life and whine about it for hours upon hours.

Worse yet, Sony wants to make stolid purveyors of malice and hatred out to be something they're not. Sony is on some sort of thesaurus-fueled rampage. Every sentence it writes is filled with needlessly long words like "roentgenographically" and "deintellectualization". Either Sony is deliberately trying to confuse us or else it's secretly scheming to progressively enlarge and increasingly centralize the means of oppression, exploitation, violence, and destruction. It's not just that Sony frequently writes self-contradictory, nonsensical "sentences" that are actually just phrases or sentence fragments filled with grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation errors but also that I'm sure it wouldn't want me to eavesdrop on its meetings. So why does Sony want to achieve total world domination? That's the big question. If you knew the answer to that then you'd also know why Sony's associates claim to have no choice but to treat people like brutal cowards. I wish there were some way to help these miserable, cheeky clunks. They are outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand. In short, Sony has vanity without pride, voluptuousness without taste, and learning without wisdom. What you really need to do to be convinced of that, however, is to study the matter for yourself. I'll be happy to send you enough facts to get you started. Just write to me.

I used a Complaint Generator.

[BOSSNIG]

Huzzah for complaint generators.

[ME86]

Kill yourself, now.

[BOSSNIG]

Kill yourself, now.

Win post is win

[blue_slime]

LOL

[Hiei]

Sony will convict me without trial, jury, or reading one complete paragraph of this letter.

Sounds right, although that can also be said of Warner and Universal.

[えっちーせんぱい]

How I feel about you: I think you suck.

[yes.derek]

Kill yourself, now.

[blue_slime]

By now everyone should have heard about the OP and its boisterous, unpatriotic assertions. In case you haven't heard or have even forgotten, allow me to refresh your memory. I realize that some of you may not know the particular background details of the events I'm referring to. I'm not going to go into those details here, but you can read up on them elsewhere. Take this example: Let's say that several of the OP's apple-polishers, who asked to remain nameless, informed me of the OP's secret plans to set the hoops through which we all must jump. Now let's say that its voiced intentions don't match its actual intentions. Does that mean that "the truth", "the whole truth", and "nothing but the truth" are three different things? No, because we must tell you a little bit about it and its poxy ebullitions. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time.

While the OP's semi-literate ramblings might be of some interest to specialists in child communication, all the deals it makes are strictly one-way. The OP gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. I act based on what I think is right, not who I think is right. That's why I try always to fight the good fight. It's also why I say that I am a law-and-order kind of person. I hate to see crimes go unpunished. That's why I unmistakably hope that the OP serves a long prison term for its illegal attempts to abuse science by using it as a mechanism of ideology.

As everyone who has access to reliable information knows, if the OP can't stand the heat, it should get out of the kitchen. I know more about interdenominationalism than most people. You might even say that I'm an expert on the subject. I can therefore state with confidence that the very genesis of the OP's addlepated, vainglorious jokes is in deconstructionism. And it seems to me to be a neat bit of historic justice that it will eventually itself be destroyed by deconstructionism. I am not fooled by the OP's stentorian and eristic rhetoric. I therefore gladly accept the responsibility of notifying others that some people say that that isn't sufficient evidence to prove that the OP is secretly scheming to encourage a deadly acceptance of intolerance. And I must agree; one needs much more evidence than that. But the evidence is there, for anyone who isn't afraid to look at it. Just look at the way that it fully intends to threaten national security. But that's not enough, not for it. The OP will additionally leave helpless citizens afraid in the streets, in their jobs, and even in their homes, which is why I insist that no one has a higher opinion of it than I, and I think it's a pugnacious jackanapes. I've left out many criticisms of the OP from this wailing wall of a letter. Nevertheless, I claim that it's a start -- a philosophical space where we can plant a new flag symbolizing all that is wrong with the OP.

[sonicdude164]

hey your username is like mine

[Syncopathic]

I am not writing to agree or disagree with SONICDUDE41. What I have to say, however, regards SONICDUDE41's decision to create catchy, new terms for boring, old issues. Let us note first of all that by allowing him to turn calumniators loose against us good citizens, we are allowing him to play puppet master. Fortunately, most people understand that he plans to abuse science by using it as a mechanism of ideology. The result will be an amalgam of out-of-touch separatism and unbalanced libertinism, if such a monster can be imagined.

The primary point of disagreement between myself and SONICDUDE41 is whether or not someone has been giving his brain a very thorough washing and now SONICDUDE41 is trying to do the same to us. Perhaps if we let SONICDUDE41 torment, harry, and persecute anyone who crosses his path, civilization itself will fall, but remember that he uses antinomianism to turn me, a typically mild-mannered person, into a cranky vat of autism. That's the large elephant in the room that nobody ever talks about. Nevertheless, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, believe that people really ought to start talking about it because then they'd realize that SONICDUDE41 contends that his allegations won't be used for political retribution. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? It is important to differentiate between worthless barmpots and cynical fast-buck artists who, in a variety of ways, have been lured by his darnable crusades or who have ended up wittingly or unwittingly in coalitions with his worshippers or who maintain contact with SONICDUDE41 as part of serious and legitimate research.

If you understand that SONICDUDE41 has become a patsy to his own malevolence, then you can comprehend that I frequently talk about how SONICDUDE41 and others of his ilk are symbols of villainous adversarialism. I would drop the subject except that he takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on him. SONICDUDE41 also ignores all of the evidence that doesn't support (or in many cases directly contradicts) his position. There's no shortage of sin in the world today. It's been around since the Garden of Eden and will really persist as long as SONICDUDE41 continues to lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its commercial integrity. Already, some audacious hellions have begun to hasten society's quiescence to moral pluralism and epistemological uncertainty, and with terrifying and tragic results. What outbursts will follow from their camp is anyone's guess. Comments on the above are welcome, but please think them out first.