NSFCD

Game-o-rama => Console Gaming => Topic started by: tibar7 on February 20, 2008, 09:22:31 PM

Poll
Question: Out of 5, what number would you give the SSBB Roster?
Option 1: 5.00 (perfect) votes: 2
Option 2: 4.75 votes: 1
Option 3: 4.50 votes: 9
Option 4: 4.25 votes: 4
Option 5: 4.00 votes: 8
Option 6: 3.75 votes: 4
Option 7: 3.50 votes: 3
Option 8: 3.25 votes: 1
Option 9: 3.00 votes: 3
Option 10: 2.75 votes: 0
Option 11: 2.50 votes: 1
Option 12: 2.25 votes: 0
Option 13: 2.00 votes: 1
Option 14: 1.75 votes: 0
Option 15: 1.50 votes: 0
Option 16: 1.25 votes: 0
Option 17: 1.00 votes: 0
Option 18: 0.75 votes: 0
Option 19: 0.50 votes: 0
Option 20: 0.25 votes: 0
Option 21: 0.00 (It's the worst thing of all time) votes: 0
Title: Grade the Roster
Post by: tibar7 on February 20, 2008, 09:22:31 PM
i thought it was great. there were only about 3 or 4 characters i wanted that didn't make it. i was happy with all the characters that did make it. 4.25
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: CuccoGuy on February 20, 2008, 09:26:36 PM
Yeah pretty much what you said. I give it a solid 4.
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Nayrman on February 20, 2008, 09:58:40 PM
Half way (2.5).
Only two characters I actually WANTED made it in (Sonic and Ike), and quite a few are rather worthles IMO (ZSS, ROB, just to name a few).
Honestly, this roster couldve, no SHOULDVE been a whole lot better. Many characters I'm okay with, but too many bad/why? characters, and not enough people I actually wanted. Sakurai dropped the ball on this...especially that outside of third parties, only three new franchises were added to the game, and they were just single reps only...
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Macawmoses on February 20, 2008, 10:02:52 PM
5.

First Reason: Wolf
Second Reason: I enjoy locking all of ya'lls threads complaining about it :P
Third: Unexpected
Fourth: Legacy [spoiler]ROB is this case, like G+W[/spoiler]
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: tollhouse2006 on February 20, 2008, 10:10:55 PM
I gave it a 4.50.  I only ask for Krystal and Mewtwo and then it's perfect.
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Skye8600 on February 20, 2008, 11:16:01 PM
4.50
Midna and Ridley...poor guys....
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: derekgforce on February 21, 2008, 03:37:19 AM
Quote from: Skye8600 on February 20, 2008, 11:16:01 PM
4.50
Midna and Ridley...poor guys....
I'm with you here.  man, ridley would be so coooool!!!
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: amplas on February 21, 2008, 04:12:50 AM
It was pretty good, could have used more Fe characters and 3rd party characters though.
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Neerb on February 21, 2008, 04:49:23 AM
Mewtwo, Ridley, Bowser Jr., Krystal, and especially Ray 01 definately should have been in, as well as a Square Enix rep.  However, giving us Olimar, Wolf, Lucario, and the totally unexpected Pokemon Trainer is good enough to keep this roster from going beyond suck.

4.00/5
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Joeofmars on February 21, 2008, 05:19:11 AM
Why the hell would we get a Square Enix rep?

Wow... I don't know why I hang out on these boards...

I give it a 3.75.
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Triforceman22 on February 21, 2008, 05:24:44 AM
3.50

No: Ridley, Krystal, Ray 01, Geno Animal crosser.






















Roy...:(
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Oren on February 21, 2008, 09:30:47 AM
i gave it a 4.25 its not that bad at all
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Ridley on February 21, 2008, 09:50:53 AM
4 for lack of Ridley.
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Gwen Khan on February 21, 2008, 09:52:16 AM
4, no Issac or Ray MK playable, among others I wanted in
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Water ☮ on February 21, 2008, 09:59:01 AM
3.50 because of 
Wolf (one clone is fine, but two of the same character!)
Lack of Krystal/new female/new metroid rep!
False hope! (Animal Crosse)
The fact that I lost the bet about the 35 character roster. >:(
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Tupin on February 21, 2008, 11:33:23 AM
3.75.

No Geno, Animal Crosser, Krystal, Ridley, Ray 01, Bomberman, Bowser Jr., or Roy.

Plus the inclusion of [spoiler]ROB[/spoiler] brought the score down.
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Ultrasuperstarenator on February 21, 2008, 11:37:03 AM
3.50

Kinda just okay,
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Lotos on February 21, 2008, 03:16:45 PM
I might have graded too harshly. Yay complaints.  I voted 2 because:


  • Certain FS's should have been more original
  • I disliked how they took out some clones, yet added some semi clones that made Luigi look like a non-clone (Toon Link and Wolf are the main examples for the above two, I will forgive Ike because he was announced so we were expecting another clone/semi-clone).
  • Having PT and Olimar as defaults isn't that great of an idea; as Java mentioned in a previous thread, it would be better to unlock them.
  • Ness and Marth should be default instead of Ike and Lucas.  Those two are newcomers, they should be unlockable
  • Come to think of it, too many newcomers are default.
  • It could have used at least one more third party character.  Sonic and Snake weren't enough, but still, it's better than one/nothing.
  • Very wanted/logical candidates such as Geno, Krystal (who would have been better than Wolf, even without a unique moveset), Bowser Jr/Shadow Mario, Animal Crossser, and Ridley were left out (at least Ridley made it in as a boss though).
  • We could have had more playables, I mean, this IS online after all.

By the way, those were opinions, not facts, for people who were going to accuse me of that.
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Jono2 on February 21, 2008, 03:22:47 PM
3.00.  it could have been so much better.  so much.
Title: Re: Grade the Roster
Post by: Avion-Finch on February 21, 2008, 08:59:00 PM
solid four, it could been a teensey bit bigger, but what we got is pretty satisfying, all of my faves from melee are back. :)