Wish List
Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess - Used for Game Cube
by Nintendo of America
Rated 9.6
Usually ships in 24 hrs
Pre-owned Guarantee
BUY PRE-OWNED
$29.99
intercourse why is it still so expensive the wii version new is 20 bucks intercourse
because someone's laughing at the fact that someone will eventually pay 30 dollars for that poop when it was a launch title and a bad zelda game and generally bad game.
also what the intercourse is your sig
Quote from: Bearissoslow on October 18, 2011, 10:39:35 PM
because someone's laughing at the fact that someone will eventually pay 30 dollars for that poop when it was a launch title and a bad zelda game and generally bad game.
also what the intercourse is your sig
I enjoyed the Wii version. I would prefer the gamecube version.
A bug, Jack Conte dancing, and the cop from Ghost Trick dancing.
Quote from: Zeromus on October 19, 2011, 12:24:11 AM
A bug, Jack Conte dancing, and the cop from Ghost Trick dancing.
IT'S UGLY
also i have tp on both gamecube and wiiiii
i like the gamecube one better
I only played the Wii one.
You can do much worse than TP
Quote from: Zeromus on October 19, 2011, 08:08:08 AM
Did you just quote yourself saying something that you never said?
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on October 19, 2011, 11:09:14 AM
Did you just quote yourself saying something that you never said?
No, he took out half of his post when he quoted it and left only the irrelevant information.
But seriously, $30 is a bit high, but I'd rather have it on the Gamecube than the Wii. It should probably be no more than 20 though, at most.
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on October 19, 2011, 11:09:14 AM
Did you just quote yourself saying something that you never said?
Quote from: Zeromus on October 19, 2011, 12:24:11 AM
I enjoyed the Wii version. I would prefer the gamecube version.
A bug, Jack Conte dancing, and the cop from Ghost Trick dancing.
Quote from: Kayo on October 19, 2011, 11:56:08 AM
No, he took out half of his post when he quoted it and left only the irrelevant information.
But seriously, $30 is a bit high, but I'd rather have it on the Gamecube than the Wii. It should probably be no more than 20 though, at most.
Derp. I'm going to sit in that corner over there...
I think it costs more because it's out of print.
It's out of print, and they didn't print as many while it was being printed. They wanted you to buy it on Wii, because it was supposed to be an early system seller. I only saw it a few times in stores when it was new, by late 2006 stores were just waiting to get new Gamecube games out of the way to make way for the new generation.
I've never played the Gamecube version. Is it any better?
Quote from: Tupin on October 19, 2011, 02:58:18 PM
It's out of print, and they didn't print as many while it was being printed. They wanted you to buy it on Wii, because it was supposed to be an early system seller. I only saw it a few times in stores when it was new, by late 2006 stores were just waiting to get new Gamecube games out of the way to make way for the new generation.
I've never played the Gamecube version. Is it any better?
Well, it's just a non-mirrowed Hyrule without motion controls and Link being lefty again.
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on October 19, 2011, 02:48:45 PM
Derp. I'm going to sit in that corner over there...
I think it costs more because it's out of print.
May be. It gives me a good feeling though, having it in my collection (I just bought it a few months ago)
The case is in perfect condition, all the manuals are in there, and the disc has not a single scratch on it. It looks as thought I bought it brand new. So I carefully pulled off the "PRE-OWNED" barcode sticker on it and you honestly can't tell it was ever used in any way but extremely carefully.
If you can get it pre-owned but not obviously used, it's not too bad.
Also, was the Wii version always $20? Could have been a price drop that it got due to still being printed, that the out-of-print GCN version didn't get.
Quote from: Kayo on October 19, 2011, 06:53:49 PM
May be. It gives me a good feeling though, having it in my collection (I just bought it a few months ago)
The case is in perfect condition, all the manuals are in there, and the disc has not a single scratch on it. It looks as thought I bought it brand new. So I carefully pulled off the "PRE-OWNED" barcode sticker on it and you honestly can't tell it was ever used in any way but extremely carefully.
If you can get it pre-owned but not obviously used, it's not too bad.
Also, was the Wii version always $20? Could have been a price drop that it got due to still being printed, that the out-of-print GCN version didn't get.
It was officially reduced to $20. But I remember seeing it with a higher price tag.
Quote from: Tupin on October 19, 2011, 02:58:18 PM
It's out of print, and they didn't print as many while it was being printed. They wanted you to buy it on Wii, because it was supposed to be an early system seller. I only saw it a few times in stores when it was new, by late 2006 stores were just waiting to get new Gamecube games out of the way to make way for the new generation.
I've never played the Gamecube version. Is it any better?
I think the Wii version is slightly prettier but other than that its pretty much a mirrored GC version with motion controls.
Using the bow/hookshot motion controls was kind of fun.
Quote from: PrinnyOnLowBudgetChris on October 19, 2011, 06:57:07 PM
It was officially reduced to $20. But I remember seeing it with a higher price tag.
It most likely was, and the price was dropped like Super Paper Mario's was, with a few others.
Quote from: Kayo on October 19, 2011, 06:53:49 PM
Also, was the Wii version always $20? Could have been a price drop that it got due to still being printed, that the out-of-print GCN version didn't get.
Nintendo Selects.
Quote from: Zeromus on October 19, 2011, 07:31:31 PM
Nintendo Selects.
Though that brings up the question of why TP on GCN never became a Player's Choice.
Quote from: Neerb on October 20, 2011, 09:20:39 PM
Though that brings up the question of why TP on GCN never became a Player's Choice.
It came out too late in the gamecubes life for nintendo to give a poop
Quote from: Neerb on October 20, 2011, 09:20:39 PM
Though that brings up the question of why TP on GCN never became a Player's Choice.
[spoiler]In the United States and Europe, Nintendo introduced the label in 1996 as Player's Choice for both the Super Nintendo Entertainment System and the Game Boy to distinguish titles that have sold over one million copies. [/spoiler]
I'm pretty sure they still use the same method of choosing Player's Choice/Nintendo Select titles.
Quote from: Zeromus on October 21, 2011, 02:53:06 PM
[spoiler]In the United States and Europe, Nintendo introduced the label in 1996 as Player's Choice for both the Super Nintendo Entertainment System and the Game Boy to distinguish titles that have sold over one million copies. [/spoiler]
I'm pretty sure they still use the same method of choosing Player's Choice/Nintendo Select titles.
The GCN version sold over 2 million copies.
Quote from: Zero on October 21, 2011, 12:10:02 PM
It came out too late in the gamecubes life for nintendo to give a poop
At that point it was just "LOL let's just put it on the GCN too why the intercourse not we can do this"
Even though by then all focus was on Wii.
Just like the time period we're in now; everything's becoming WiiU so anything coming out on Wii from here on out won't be so important.
Quote from: Kayo on October 22, 2011, 04:29:10 PM
At that point it was just "LOL let's just put it on the GCN too why the intercourse not we can do this"
You literally have no idea what you're talking about.
Quote from: Zeromus on October 22, 2011, 07:41:17 PM
You literally have no idea what you're talking about.
did he seriously say that
it was intercourse ing originally designed for the gamecube
you don't even have to be a zelda buff to know such a common fact like that.
Quote from: Bearissoslow on October 22, 2011, 07:44:15 PM
post cleared so he doesn't see it.
I didn't explain it because I didn't feel he deserved it, it was such a stupid comment.
I suggest you delete your post. Keep him ignorant.
Quote from: Zeromus on October 22, 2011, 07:49:32 PM
I didn't explain it because I didn't feel he deserved it, it was such a stupid comment.
I suggest you delete your post. Keep him ignorant.
Who's to say they didn't have the idea to release it for the next system originally?
Or to be honest I'm just making up poop because if I say what I really think you idiots flip poop.
I'm honestly surprised you're regarding anything I say as something I mean or even think is true.
Quote from: Kayo on October 22, 2011, 11:00:12 PM
Who's to say they didn't have the idea to release it for the next system originally?
Or to be honest I'm just making up poop because if I say what I really think you idiots flip poop.
I'm honestly surprised you're regarding anything I say as something I mean or even think is true.
i lol when k tries to play the "i waznt being seerius guise" card to get out of being called a retard.
Quote from: Kayo on October 22, 2011, 11:00:12 PM
Who's to say they didn't have the idea to release it for the next system originally?
Because that's not true at all? :U
Quote from: Kayo on October 22, 2011, 11:00:12 PM
I'm honestly surprised you're regarding anything I say as something I mean or even think is true.
Or just keep playing the "I was only pretending to be a retard!" card.
Quote from: Kayo on October 22, 2011, 04:29:10 PM
At that point it was just "LOL let's just put it on the GCN too why the intercourse not we can do this"
Even though by then all focus was on Wii.
Just like the time period we're in now; everything's becoming WiiU so anything coming out on Wii from here on out won't be so important.
... SS being the obvious exception. I can't believe Nintendo's biggest game ever is less than a month away...
:|
riddler what happened to epicmafia
okay then
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on October 23, 2011, 09:00:18 AM
... SS being the obvious exception. I can't believe Nintendo's biggest game ever is less than a month away...
Half the new games that come out are "Nintendo's biggest game ever."
For a while.
Quote from: Kayo on October 23, 2011, 03:29:11 PM
Half the new games that come out are "Nintendo's biggest game ever."
For a while.
you really haven't been paying attention then
Quote from: Zero on October 23, 2011, 03:38:03 PM
you really haven't been paying attention then
This is their biggest game until something bigger comes along, basically.
Quote from: Zero on October 23, 2011, 03:38:03 PM
you really haven't been paying attention then
it's kind of true, though
AAA titles like 3D Marios and Zeldas are always are backed by intercourse huge teams and budgets. Coupled with the hype they all get, it seems like every one of those games is going to topple all previous titles.
main series games aren't half of nintendo games though
hurrrrrrr
oh god he exaggerated a statistic while still getting essentially the same meaning
better go add some nintendo games
Quote from: Doodle on October 24, 2011, 02:42:37 PM
it's kind of true, though
AAA titles like 3D Marios and Zeldas are always are backed by intercourse huge teams and budgets. Coupled with the hype they all get, it seems like every one of those games is going to topple all previous titles.
Remember how people felt about Super Mario Galaxy? That was the biggest Nintendo game up until the next major one came out.
Quote from: Doodle on October 24, 2011, 02:42:37 PM
it's kind of true, though
AAA titles like 3D Marios and Zeldas are always are backed by intercourse huge teams and budgets. Coupled with the hype they all get, it seems like every one of those games is going to topple all previous titles.
Maybe. But they don't claim that each project is the "biggest project in Nintendo history" like they have with SS. It's in the press this time.
Quote from: Doodle on October 24, 2011, 03:41:03 PM
oh god he exaggerated a statistic while still getting essentially the same meaning
better go add some nintendo games
you're reaching kayo territory
Quote from: Kayo on October 23, 2011, 05:59:14 PM
This is their biggest game until something bigger comes along, basically.
Yes. That's how this industry has worked forever. The point here is that Nintendo had 200 people working on it, which is crazy!
Quote from: Zero on October 24, 2011, 06:51:56 PM
Maybe. But they don't claim that each project is the "biggest project in Nintendo history" like they have with SS. It's in the press this time.
Uh, have you ever seen an advertisement?
No matter where you go, the new object is ALWAYS the biggest, the best, the most expansive (etc.) thing yet.
It's not like Nintendo's projects have been getting smaller and smaller until this.
Quote from: Kayo on October 24, 2011, 08:48:11 PM
Uh, have you ever seen an advertisement?
No matter where you go, the new object is ALWAYS the biggest, the best, the most expansive (etc.) thing yet.
It's not like Nintendo's projects have been getting smaller and smaller until this.
Yes.
You're clearly the one that hasn't paying attention to what PR folks at Nintendo have been saying about this game. They've been saying for about a year now that its the biggest project Nintendo has ever worked on. They've never explicitly claimed this before, Kayo. Whether or not its true is something else entirely and not my intercourse ing point.
You're smoking crack if you really believe that every advertisement for every Nintendo game ever explicitly stated that each said game was the biggest Nintendo game yet. Each new game is not "always the biggest, the best, and most expansive(etc.) thing yet."
At first I couldn't believe you said something so short sighted, but then I remembered that you're the same exact guy that thought Nintendo was trying to insult you for not buying a 3DS early with the Ambassador program.
Anyway at this point I'm practically beating my head into a brick wall. If you don't understand this then there's no point in continuing this discussion.
custom let me borrow your guns so i can go blow some poop up
Quote from: Zero on October 24, 2011, 09:24:12 PM
Yes.
You're clearly the one that hasn't paying attention to what PR folks at Nintendo have been saying about this game. They've been saying for about a year now that its the biggest project Nintendo has ever worked on. They've never explicitly claimed this before, Kayo. Whether or not its true is something else entirely and not my intercourse ing point.
You're smoking crack if you really believe that every advertisement for every Nintendo game ever explicitly stated that each said game was the biggest Nintendo game yet. Each new game is not "always the biggest, the best, and most expansive(etc.) thing yet."
At first I couldn't believe you said something so short sighted, but then I remembered that you're the same exact guy that thought Nintendo was trying to insult you for not buying a 3DS early with the Ambassador program.
Anyway at this point I'm practically beating my head into a brick wall. If you don't understand this then there's no point in continuing this discussion.
custom let me borrow your guns so i can go blow some poop up
Explicitly, no. But you're on drugs if you don't think that
A) something better will eventually come, even according to Nintendo themself
B) the hype will die down within months.
Quote from: Zero on October 24, 2011, 09:24:12 PM
Yes.
You're clearly the one that hasn't paying attention to what PR folks at Nintendo have been saying about this game. They've been saying for about a year now that its the biggest project Nintendo has ever worked on. They've never explicitly claimed this before, Kayo. Whether or not its true is something else entirely and not my intercourse ing point.
You're smoking crack if you really believe that every advertisement for every Nintendo game ever explicitly stated that each said game was the biggest Nintendo game yet. Each new game is not "always the biggest, the best, and most expansive(etc.) thing yet."
At first I couldn't believe you said something so short sighted, but then I remembered that you're the same exact guy that thought Nintendo was trying to insult you for not buying a 3DS early with the Ambassador program.
Anyway at this point I'm practically beating my head into a brick wall. If you don't understand this then there's no point in continuing this discussion.
custom let me borrow your guns so i can go blow some poop up
let's do it
also thanks you to i've formed a brawl tourny in my twon lolololoololoo
Quote from: Kayo on October 24, 2011, 09:51:10 PM
Explicitly, no. But you're on drugs if you don't think that
A) something better will eventually come, even according to Nintendo themself
B) the hype will die down within months.
Cute, you're using the word explicitly and using a similar expression to one I frequently use!
Also it seems that you didn't understand a single thing I said. When did I EVER say that the hype won't die down(which coincidentally has NOTHING to do with what I was saying) or that something bigger and "better" won't come?
God Kayo share your meth with the rest of the class, please.
i'm kayo this isn't pokemon therefore i'm going to argue against its hype and size
pokemon is betTer
Quote from: Zero on October 25, 2011, 08:29:05 AM
Cute, you're using the word explicitly and using a similar expression to one I frequently use!
Also it seems that you didn't understand a single thing I said. When did I EVER say that the hype won't die down(which coincidentally has NOTHING to do with what I was saying) or that something bigger and "better" won't come?
God Kayo share your meth with the rest of the class, please.
I seriously don't see your argument here.
Quote from: Custom on October 25, 2011, 08:46:56 AM
i'm kayo this isn't pokemon therefore i'm going to argue against its hype and size
pokemon is betTer
>implying pokemon gray doesn't have the biggest budget nintendo has ever used on a game
Quote from: Kayo on October 25, 2011, 12:11:04 PM
I seriously don't see your argument here.
There's no hope.
Quote from: Kayo on October 25, 2011, 12:11:04 PM
I seriously don't see your argument here.
F you're escorted off the campus
why do people still pay attention to the n_gger
he loves it