If You Were Asked To Be A Mod Here...

[Ugawa]

I'd accept and start off by locking threads like "How many stairs do you have in your house?"  There are a lot of random threads that have no real purpose whatsoever other than to up someone's post count, and I'd lock all of them.  I'd probably read the serious threads more in depth and visit more often than once/twice a day too.  Oh, and I'd juice up the "Serious Discussion" somehow.

[Doodle]

Uh, well the odds of that happening to me are very VERY slim. :P
But I guess I would accept. A lot of people probably think I would blow up the forums, but I think I would do a decent job.

[Dawei]

I wouldn't accept.

[HTA!]

I wouldn't accept.

Be more confident in yourself.

If it has anything to do with the actual technical side of running things, I would take a lot of time just learning the material, and with school coming up that's a no-no.

But if it was just some kind of navigator, lead crew thing I see no reason anyone would decline. >_>

[darkmario]

Yea I would accept.
And I guess I would do a good job.

[sonicdude164]

Yeah, I would accept.

[Linkman]

Funny how everyone says they'd except, but would probably never be asked unless some idiot took over as head admin.

[Cecil_and_Kain]

Funny how everyone says they'd except, but would probably never be asked unless some idiot took over as head admin.

That isn't really the point...

[PsychoYoshi]

no id be a terrible mod and would never accept

[JrDude]

I'd accept and start off by locking threads like "How many stairs do you have in your house?"  There are a lot of random threads that have no real purpose whatsoever other than to up someone's post count, and I'd lock all of them.  I'd probably read the serious threads more in depth and visit more often than once/twice a day too.  Oh, and I'd juice up the "Serious Discussion" somehow.

Those threads are mainly here because there's barely any activity.

[Ugawa]

I'd accept and start off by locking threads like "How many stairs do you have in your house?"  There are a lot of random threads that have no real purpose whatsoever other than to up someone's post count, and I'd lock all of them.  I'd probably read the serious threads more in depth and visit more often than once/twice a day too.  Oh, and I'd juice up the "Serious Discussion" somehow.

Those threads are mainly here because there's barely any activity.

So we solve inactivity by employing pointless activity?  Doesn't sound too productive =D.

[Cecil_and_Kain]

I'd accept and start off by locking threads like "How many stairs do you have in your house?"  There are a lot of random threads that have no real purpose whatsoever other than to up someone's post count, and I'd lock all of them.  I'd probably read the serious threads more in depth and visit more often than once/twice a day too.  Oh, and I'd juice up the "Serious Discussion" somehow.

Those threads are mainly here because there's barely any activity.

So we solve inactivity by employing pointless activity?  Doesn't sound too productive =D.

Why don't you make a thread and stop complaining?

[Macawmoses]

I find your post interesting, Ugawa, because you can do those things without being staff.

You can report useless threads like that, and you can boost Serious discussion. Being a mod isn't necessary at all.

[Lotos]

I guess, but I'd rather be a Local Knight.

[jnfs2014]

I would politely decline it for the reason being that I don't have my own computer, get on 20 minutes a day, and for the fact no one would like a 12 year old MOD.