MW3 news from Kansas City.

[Doodle]

CoD is a poopty, jewed series now, but it can still be fun. Not at all worth $60, which nobody seems to realize so this craze will probably continue as long as 9 million people buy the game on release every time.
I've always thought the campaigns were boring, though; just a lot of going from point a to point b with a bunch of explosions and poop in between. Not a lot of depth to it. The multiplayers usually broken in some way, too. Plus the whole kill streaks thing.

tl;dr the game is on par with flinging poop at your friends but can still be fun

[Silverhawk79]

CoD is a poopty, jewed series now, but it can still be fun. Not at all worth $60, which nobody seems to realize so this craze will probably continue as long as 9 million people buy the game on release every time.
I've always thought the campaigns were boring, though; just a lot of going from point a to point b with a bunch of explosions and poop in between. Not a lot of depth to it. The multiplayers usually broken in some way, too. Plus the whole kill streaks thing.

tl;dr the game is on par with flinging poop at your friends but can still be fun

i take it you have much experience flinging poop
and dick smashing

[Flying Chickens]

i take it you have much experience flinging poop
and dick smashing

Cock whack mother intercourse eFUUUUUCKAAAAAr.

[Kayo]

CoD is a poopty, jewed series now, but it can still be fun. Not at all worth $60, which nobody seems to realize so this craze will probably continue as long as 9 million people buy the game on release every time.
I've always thought the campaigns were boring, though; just a lot of going from point a to point b with a bunch of explosions and poop in between. Not a lot of depth to it. The multiplayers usually broken in some way, too. Plus the whole kill streaks thing.

tl;dr the game is on par with flinging poop at your friends but can still be fun

And this too, it's a hefty price to the same thing over again with some additions
When you already pay a sum of money per month to play it, because as BFB said, the online is the reason people keep buying them.

[Doodle]

i take it you have much experience flinging poop
and dick smashing

yes
I used to play the conduit B)

[Zero]

the conduit?

bahahahaha

[Doodle]

Yep. Back when I only had a Wii
I think I still have that silly Modern Warfare Reflex edition somewhere, too

[BOREDFOREVER]

And this too, it's a hefty price to the same thing over again with some additions
When you already pay a sum of money per month to play it, because as BFB said, the online is the reason people keep buying them.

I don't pay a sum of money a month to play it.

[Doodle]

I don't pay a sum of money a month to play it.

You don't play multiplayer? So you just pay $60 for a 6-hour campaign? :U

[BOREDFOREVER]

You don't play multiplayer? So you just pay $60 for a 6-hour campaign? :U

I paid $60 at the beginning, yes, but not per month.

[Doodle]

I paid $60 at the beginning, yes, but not per month.

Oh, right. Just the year

[Kayo]

I paid $60 at the beginning, yes, but not per month.

Month, year, it's still money you have to pay over and over again to keep playing the game, which you already paid an unnaturally high amount for.

[Zero]

Month, year, it's still money you have to pay over and over again to keep playing the game, which you already paid an unnaturally high amount for.

Alright Kayo I'm going to try to be as nice as possible. Don't QQ.

You're acting like a intercourse ing dippoop and here's why:

To begin with, Call of Duty does not require a monthly fee. Nor does it require a yearly fee. This last post of yours desperately tries to save your argument by equating each sequel to be in essence a yearly "fee" of sorts but unfortunately it doesn't quite work that way, please stop being so ignorant. Modern Warfare 3, is not Modern Warfare 2, and Modern Warfare 2 is not Modern Warfare. Call of Duty 1 is not Call of Duty 2. You have virtually no experience with this franchise but you're making all these assumptions about it like you've 100%'d some of the games like I have, when you know next to nothing, and your argument is evidence of this.

Secondly, you don't even understand why BFB brought Pokemon into the equation, do you? He did that because many of us here are knowledgeable enough about Pokemon to know that each game retains the same core gameplay from the original games. Each game has more content, slightly different mechanics, more "characters"(pokemon or otherwise), but its still the same turn-based monster battle collecting RPG. We still BUY it even though we know its more of the same. CoD fans do the same thing. Each game has its own thing going on. See what's going on here?

I'll reiterate for you: CoD fans aren't paying a yearly fee to play the same game.

Using that logic, every main series Mega Man game is the exact same game. Every Crash Bandicoot game is the same game. Every Spyro is the same game. Oh hey those Uncharted games? Same exact game.

Sometimes fans want more of the same, sometimes they don't, Kayo.

[Doodle]

It's not a matter of "more of the same." It's a matter of next to no effort being put into the game because people will buy the game anyway and just praise it as being so amazing when it's usually just mediocre at best.

Using that logic, every main series Mega Man game is the exact same game. Every Crash Bandicoot game is the same game. Every Spyro is the same game. Oh hey those Uncharted games? Same exact game.

I know you're just making a point, but I think even that only really applies to Mega Man, since that was like what Capcom is doing to Street Fighter today only on a smaller scale. (。◡ °)

[Kayo]

It's not a matter of "more of the same." It's a matter of next to no effort being put into the game because people will buy the game anyway and just praise it as being so amazing when it's usually just mediocre at best.

Sounds like you're kind of on the same page I am. The games really aren't worth having orgasms over the morning on release day, but for some reason people do it anyway.

It's just bizarre.