There is absolutley nothing that is flawless right?
Well, what happens if there's something that's so flawed, that it becomes flawless by some weird backwards mathematics that none of us understand?
Then what do we do, do we change the fact that said object is flawless even though there is no such thing as a perfect object?
Or do we just drink and shrug it off for the next ones to care about it figure it out?
I say intercourse it.
Let someone else do it. I'm too busy enjoying life.
I chose the third option, thank yuu. <3
Quote from: Redpaige13 on April 20, 2008, 09:11:57 PM
I chose the third option, thank yuu. <3
There's no third option, there's only 2.
Quote from: Blaziken on April 20, 2008, 09:15:33 PM
Quote from: Redpaige13 on April 20, 2008, 09:11:57 PM
I chose the third option, thank yuu. <3
There's no third option, there's only 2.
Then the last one.
Or the second one..
...I'M BLOND, OK? Dx
Quote from: Redpaige13 on April 20, 2008, 09:22:01 PM
Quote from: Blaziken on April 20, 2008, 09:15:33 PM
Quote from: Redpaige13 on April 20, 2008, 09:11:57 PM
I chose the third option, thank yuu. <3
There's no third option, there's only 2.
Then the last one.
Or the second one..
...I'M BLOND, OK? Dx
/me makes Tsuruya laugh at you
Quote from: Blaziken on April 20, 2008, 09:25:14 PM
Quote from: Redpaige13 on April 20, 2008, 09:22:01 PM
Quote from: Blaziken on April 20, 2008, 09:15:33 PM
Quote from: Redpaige13 on April 20, 2008, 09:11:57 PM
I chose the third option, thank yuu. <3
There's no third option, there's only 2.
Then the last one.
Or the second one..
...I'M BLOND, OK? Dx
/me makes Tsuruya laugh at you
you really overdid it now.
Quote from: Sceptile on April 20, 2008, 09:52:41 PM
Quote from: Blaziken on April 20, 2008, 09:25:14 PM
Quote from: Redpaige13 on April 20, 2008, 09:22:01 PM
Quote from: Blaziken on April 20, 2008, 09:15:33 PM
Quote from: Redpaige13 on April 20, 2008, 09:11:57 PM
I chose the third option, thank yuu. <3
There's no third option, there's only 2.
Then the last one.
Or the second one..
...I'M BLOND, OK? Dx
/me makes Tsuruya laugh at you
you really overdid it now.
Christ almighty. o.o;
I didn't realize those until now.
Quote from: Redpaige13 on April 20, 2008, 09:54:15 PM
Quote from: Sceptile on April 20, 2008, 09:52:41 PM
Quote from: Blaziken on April 20, 2008, 09:25:14 PM
Quote from: Redpaige13 on April 20, 2008, 09:22:01 PM
Quote from: Blaziken on April 20, 2008, 09:15:33 PM
Quote from: Redpaige13 on April 20, 2008, 09:11:57 PM
I chose the third option, thank yuu. <3
There's no third option, there's only 2.
Then the last one.
Or the second one..
...I'M BLOND, OK? Dx
/me makes Tsuruya laugh at you
you really overdid it now.
Christ almighty. o.o;
I didn't realize those until now.
I'm bored ~_~
Quote from: Blaziken on April 20, 2008, 09:06:48 PM
There is absolutley nothing that is flawless right?
Well, what happens if there's something that's so flawed, that it becomes flawless by some weird backwards mathematics that none of us understand?
Then what do we do, do we change the fact that said object is flawless even though there is no such thing as a perfect object?
Or do we just drink and shrug it off for the next ones to care about it figure it out?
...what
Figure it out.
There's no possible way that it can be flawless if it has so many flaws.
Besides... I don't think there's a backwards mathmatic equation. To my knowledge.
Quote from: Hero_Of_Time1 on April 21, 2008, 08:27:58 AM
There's no possible way that it can be flawless if it has so many flaws.
Besides... I don't think there's a backwards mathmatic equation. To my knowledge.
This isn't supposed to make sense.
Quote from: Blaziken on April 21, 2008, 08:29:04 AM
Quote from: Hero_Of_Time1 on April 21, 2008, 08:27:58 AM
There's no possible way that it can be flawless if it has so many flaws.
Besides... I don't think there's a backwards mathmatic equation. To my knowledge.
This isn't supposed to make sense.
Then no. Math is suppose to make sense. There's always an answer for every math question...
Quote from: Hero_Of_Time1 on April 21, 2008, 08:38:27 AM
Quote from: Blaziken on April 21, 2008, 08:29:04 AM
Quote from: Hero_Of_Time1 on April 21, 2008, 08:27:58 AM
There's no possible way that it can be flawless if it has so many flaws.
Besides... I don't think there's a backwards mathmatic equation. To my knowledge.
This isn't supposed to make sense.
Then no. Math is suppose to make sense. There's always an answer for every math question...
What are the coordinates of (x,y) if |x| = 0 and y < -2?
Quote from: Zovistograt on April 21, 2008, 08:40:31 AM
Quote from: Hero_Of_Time1 on April 21, 2008, 08:38:27 AM
Quote from: Blaziken on April 21, 2008, 08:29:04 AM
Quote from: Hero_Of_Time1 on April 21, 2008, 08:27:58 AM
There's no possible way that it can be flawless if it has so many flaws.
Besides... I don't think there's a backwards mathmatic equation. To my knowledge.
This isn't supposed to make sense.
Then no. Math is suppose to make sense. There's always an answer for every math question...
What are the coordinates of (x,y) if |x| = 0 and y < -2?
I'd say 0 and -2, but I have the feeling that's wrong because it's so simple.
Quote from: Zovistograt on April 21, 2008, 08:40:31 AM
Quote from: Hero_Of_Time1 on April 21, 2008, 08:38:27 AM
Quote from: Blaziken on April 21, 2008, 08:29:04 AM
Quote from: Hero_Of_Time1 on April 21, 2008, 08:27:58 AM
There's no possible way that it can be flawless if it has so many flaws.
Besides... I don't think there's a backwards mathmatic equation. To my knowledge.
This isn't supposed to make sense.
Then no. Math is suppose to make sense. There's always an answer for every math question...
What are the coordinates of (x,y) if |x| = 0 and y < -2?
Don't intercourse ing ask me D:
I kill babies for a living.
Lets see.. if and only if... 0..
y is less than -2... -3?, -4?
... 0,-2
Quote from: Blaziken on April 21, 2008, 08:44:25 AM
Quote from: Zovistograt on April 21, 2008, 08:40:31 AM
Quote from: Hero_Of_Time1 on April 21, 2008, 08:38:27 AM
Quote from: Blaziken on April 21, 2008, 08:29:04 AM
Quote from: Hero_Of_Time1 on April 21, 2008, 08:27:58 AM
There's no possible way that it can be flawless if it has so many flaws.
Besides... I don't think there's a backwards mathmatic equation. To my knowledge.
This isn't supposed to make sense.
Then no. Math is suppose to make sense. There's always an answer for every math question...
What are the coordinates of (x,y) if |x| = 0 and y < -2?
I'd say 0 and -2, but I have the feeling that's wrong because it's so simple.
oh wait I messed it up
it should be y = |x|
Quote from: Zovistograt on April 21, 2008, 09:08:46 AM
Quote from: Blaziken on April 21, 2008, 08:44:25 AM
Quote from: Zovistograt on April 21, 2008, 08:40:31 AM
Quote from: Hero_Of_Time1 on April 21, 2008, 08:38:27 AM
Quote from: Blaziken on April 21, 2008, 08:29:04 AM
Quote from: Hero_Of_Time1 on April 21, 2008, 08:27:58 AM
There's no possible way that it can be flawless if it has so many flaws.
Besides... I don't think there's a backwards mathmatic equation. To my knowledge.
This isn't supposed to make sense.
Then no. Math is suppose to make sense. There's always an answer for every math question...
What are the coordinates of (x,y) if |x| = 0 and y < -2?
I'd say 0 and -2, but I have the feeling that's wrong because it's so simple.
oh wait I messed it up
it should be y = |x|
...
So y= 0. 0,0.
This is why living things are perfect! We are so flawed ourselves that there is an infinite amount of improvement!
There was a similar paradox to this one. I believe you can solve it using calculus, but I don't know Calculus.