NSFCD

Generally Speaking => Power On => Topic started by: JrDude on November 05, 2010, 10:53:46 PM

Title: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: JrDude on November 05, 2010, 10:53:46 PM
Let's say we met. Me and you.
Let's say you and Silver met. If you are Silver, Star.
Let's say you and KJ (one of the most known females of the forum) met. If you are KJ, Shorti.

How would you react? Would you speak as if you knew them, or as if they were a total stranger? Would you be nervous at all?
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: bluaki on November 05, 2010, 11:01:19 PM
I'd treat you all like a stranger </3

I don't really feel like I know anybody very well. I guess Silver's the closest, but I'd expect a conversation with him to be like a quick "oh hi"
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: Allegretto on November 05, 2010, 11:46:26 PM
It kind of depends, I would wait to see how the conversation with someone was going and try to jump in, maybe have a cigarette with someone here if they wanted to and jump into a conversation like that.
If it was like a NSFCD con I would most likely not just walk up to anyone in particular and start talking with them.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: The Riddler on November 06, 2010, 12:02:56 AM
If I met Silver, we'd party.
If I met you, I might have to punch you.
If I met KJ? I can't speak of this.
I HAVE met Lotos.  He's pretty cool, but shy.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: Rayquarian on November 06, 2010, 12:17:42 AM
I'm quiet anyway.  I probably wouldn't speak unless you spoke to me first.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: The Seventh on November 06, 2010, 09:45:00 AM
Like I said, I'd talk to pretty much anyone from this forum, aside Custom.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: SkyMyl on November 06, 2010, 10:03:57 AM
If I met you, Jr, I'd probably say "Hey".
If I met Silver, I'd probably say "'sup?".
If I met KJ, I'd probably say "Hey there."

Going by reactions, I'd probably speak as if I knew you guys.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: ThePowerOfOne on November 06, 2010, 01:00:33 PM
I don't really know many people here all that well, but i'm still friendly with anyone I just met and treat them like we've been friends forever.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: Macawmoses on November 06, 2010, 01:02:00 PM
If I met Silver, I'd get him drunk. Then record the antics that ensure for NSFCD's viewing pleasure.

That is all.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: The Seventh on November 06, 2010, 01:07:30 PM
Quote from: Mace on November 06, 2010, 01:02:00 PM
If I met Silver, I'd get him drunk. Then record the antics that ensure for NSFCD's viewing pleasure.

That is all.
Mack...I don't know wether to lol or be scared.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: dawnwolfNxhoj on November 06, 2010, 02:19:38 PM
hmm, if i was to meet anyone from nsfcd in real life.....
i'd probably treat them with respect like i would with most people
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: Macawmoses on November 06, 2010, 03:06:24 PM
also that should have been ensue
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: BOREDFOREVER on November 06, 2010, 03:24:50 PM
Quote from: Mace on November 06, 2010, 01:02:00 PM
If I met Silver, I'd get him drunk. Then record the antics that ensure for NSFCD's viewing pleasure.

That is all.

I might have to do this.  Old enough yet Silver?

Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: Magnum on November 06, 2010, 03:29:59 PM
Let's say we met. Me and you.
Let's say you and Silver met. If you are Silver, Star.
Let's say you and KJ (one of the most known females of the forum) met. If you are KJ, Shorti.

1. I'd be like, "sup bro?"
2. I'd be like, "sup bro?"
3. I'd be like, "sup broette?"
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: SkyMyl on November 06, 2010, 07:41:53 PM
Quote from: Mace on November 06, 2010, 01:02:00 PM
That is all.
(http://img.youtube.com/vi/Oba_DgitYIM/0.jpg)
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: Dog Food on November 06, 2010, 09:27:42 PM
If I met JrDude, then he'd have to teach me how to dance.
If I met Silver, then I'd probably finally give a donation, since doing it in person is a lot easier than via PayPal.
If I met KJ - wait a second...
If I met Shorti, then we'd have to start a DDR competition (using my skills JrDude taught me, of course).
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: ThePowerOfOne on November 06, 2010, 11:23:16 PM
Quote from: Poet Laureate on November 06, 2010, 09:27:42 PM
If I met JrDude, then he'd have to teach me how to dance.
If I met Silver, then I'd probably finally give a donation, since doing it in person is a lot easier than via PayPal.
If I met KJ - wait a second...
If I met Shorti, then we'd have to start a DDR competition (using my skills JrDude taught me, of course).
I've been dancing since I was 6, I could teach you :3
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: JrDude on November 07, 2010, 01:03:17 AM
I ballroom dance, much more female-liked, allows use of another person, and it allows you to get upclose and personal with your partner, or not.
I'm not saying I'd do it to get up close and personal with KJ, I'm just saying one of the reasons I like it and why others should like it.

It's good for both genders, the girl doesn't have to think, the guy leads 90% of the time, so if the girl has mastered it, she will just respond naturally. The guy can screw up a bit and most wouldn't notice because the girl gets 90% of the attention from the audience (usually).

Why I pointed that out? I don't know.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: Anarchy_Jas on November 07, 2010, 03:37:08 PM
Quote from: JrDude 益 on November 05, 2010, 10:53:46 PM
Let's say we met. Me and you.
Let's say you and Silver met. If you are Silver, Star.
Let's say you and KJ (one of the most known females of the forum) met. If you are KJ, Shorti.

How would you react? Would you speak as if you knew them, or as if they were a total stranger? Would you be nervous at all?

Why am I always thought of as the second/alternate/nobody likes? But um yeah, dunno what I'd say or do. Probably just be my usual (insane as some people say) self.

Quote from: Mace on November 06, 2010, 01:02:00 PM
If I met Silver, I'd get him drunk. Then record the antics that ensure for NSFCD's viewing pleasure.

That is all.

Do it, I wanna see.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: JrDude on November 07, 2010, 11:05:11 PM
Everyone likes you Shorti, I just said KJ because people probably flirt with her more than you, she also makes more threads, (though you might post more in general, I can't recall a thread you've made) so is more well known in a way.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: Silverhawk79 on November 08, 2010, 05:32:50 PM
Quote from: BOREDFANBOY on November 06, 2010, 03:24:50 PM
I might have to do this.  Old enough yet Silver?


In one month. :(
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: Dog Food on November 08, 2010, 07:35:20 PM
Quote from: JrDude 益 on November 07, 2010, 11:05:11 PM
Everyone likes you Shorti, I just said KJ because people probably flirt with her more than you, she also makes more threads, (though you might post more in general, I can't recall a thread you've made) so is more well known in a way.
...Something just seems completely wrong about that post. I just can't put my flirter... sorry, I mean finger, on it.

If I'm more "well known in a way", as you put it, it's only because of participating in games like Big Brother and Survivor. Those things forced me to get involved with topics and posts, etc. Overall, I'd say Shorti is more well known, since I can think of quite a few attributes that fit her well (DDR, signature middle finger, cooking, fiery personality, etc), while I can't think of anything that goes along with my name.

The More You Know~
(http://palmgoon.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/the_more_you_know2.jpg)
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: JrDude on November 08, 2010, 07:50:44 PM
She has more known about her, you have more knownability, though that's not a word you know what I mean.

Look at the thread "Theoretically," you are mentioned more, if not for being hung out with, than being the root of the joke since you are the more known female member.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: Magnum on November 08, 2010, 08:28:03 PM
I know Shorti better because she's been here longer, but hey, who cares. This should make everyone feel better.

4. Let's say you and Shorti met. What would you say?
"Sup broette?"
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: Silverhawk79 on November 08, 2010, 08:50:42 PM
Quote from: JrDude 益 on November 08, 2010, 07:50:44 PM
She has more known about her, you have more knownability, though that's not a word you know what I mean.

Look at the thread "Theoretically," you are mentioned more, if not for being hung out with, than being the root of the joke since you are the more known female member.
Knownability?
cool word bro
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: JrDude on November 08, 2010, 10:15:28 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 08, 2010, 08:50:42 PM
Knownability?
cool word bro
Thanks Brah.
Title: Re: Theoretically 2.0
Post by: Eizweir on November 09, 2010, 01:55:30 PM
I really wouldn't care what went down.  It'd most likely be a 'hey sup' or 'oh cool' type of thing.