NSFCD

Game-o-rama => Console Gaming => Topic started by: Ridley on November 07, 2007, 11:57:31 AM

Poll
Question: Should he?
Option 1: Hell yes
Option 2: Yes
Option 3: No
Option 4: Hell no
Title: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Ridley on November 07, 2007, 11:57:31 AM
Who likes Shadow?
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Triforceman22 on November 07, 2007, 12:49:59 PM
I would want him in...
But he can't be in.... because there can only be three 3rd part reps. and two are already taken (one is also from the same company... Sonic... ;))
Maybe as an AT....
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: DSWiiMaster42 on November 07, 2007, 03:00:12 PM
Yes he should.
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Xanatos on November 07, 2007, 03:49:19 PM
Shadow would be pretty cool, but he would be similar to Sonic in feel (not necessarily his moves).
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Dawei on November 07, 2007, 04:03:38 PM
Sakurai said that there would be 2 or 3 3rd party reps NOT including Snake, so it's possible.

As for him being in, I could care less.
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: thunderhero4 on November 07, 2007, 04:23:39 PM
although his chances are really low, hed have one of the best movesets, if u made him right... i said hell yes, cuz the more characters, the better.
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Depster on November 07, 2007, 04:52:03 PM
IF anything, he'll just be a sonic recolor... but i would like him in!
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Ridley on November 07, 2007, 06:26:39 PM
an alternate character would not be bad come to think of it
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: bluaki on November 08, 2007, 02:12:12 PM
As an alternate costume, sure.
As a new character, no way. Tails should be way more deserving of that out of the Sonic characters.
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: vernanonix on November 08, 2007, 05:57:58 PM
Quote from: bluaki on November 08, 2007, 02:12:12 PM
As an alternate costume, sure.
As a new character, no way. Tails should be way more deserving of that out of the Sonic characters.
I'm agreeing with you on that one.
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: tollhouse2006 on November 09, 2007, 04:41:42 AM
What on Earth can Tails possibly do?  I've always pictured him as a wus but if you can tell how he can fight maybe I'll change my thoughts about him.  I know he can fly but what else can he do?
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Triforceman22 on November 09, 2007, 05:12:52 AM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on November 09, 2007, 04:41:42 AM
What on Earth can Tails possibly do?  I've always pictured him as a wus but if you can tell how he can fight maybe I'll change my thoughts about him.  I know he can fly but what else can he do?

Tails + Cyclone = good character
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Rius on November 09, 2007, 05:38:23 AM
I really want Shadow to be playable, but the he might just end up being an AT. :(
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: LightShock on November 09, 2007, 08:07:02 AM
It would be cool if he was in, but Tails is way more deservering.
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: tollhouse2006 on November 09, 2007, 10:18:22 PM
Are you Sonic fans not satisfied that atleast Sonic is in?!!!! >:(  Why do you want more Sonic characters?  You already got the blue hedgehog who doesn't wear pants!!  :D
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: DededeCloneChris on November 10, 2007, 10:27:24 AM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on November 09, 2007, 10:18:22 PM
Are you Sonic fans not satisfied that atleast Sonic is in?!!!! >:(  Why do you want more Sonic characters?  You already got the blue hedgehog who doesn't wear pants!!  :D
But we need Amy or Cream, because they ARE in clothes!
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Java on November 10, 2007, 10:40:09 AM
I voted Hell No!

For one thing, Tails and Eggman are both much more deserving. But we don't need any more Sonic reps.

It should be one 3rd-Party rep per company.

I see 4 Sonic AT's (if possible):
Tails
Eggman
Shadow
Knuckles
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Shujinco2 on November 10, 2007, 06:31:16 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on November 09, 2007, 04:41:42 AM
What on Earth can Tails possibly do?  I've always pictured him as a wus but if you can tell how he can fight maybe I'll change my thoughts about him.  I know he can fly but what else can he do?
Well, he WAS the smart one!

Something with LOT'S of gadgets!
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Allegretto on November 10, 2007, 07:48:54 PM
Shadow Should be playable Period.!
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Ridley on November 10, 2007, 08:34:12 PM
Why do people like this thread so much? It just gets bumped every few hours.
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: tollhouse2006 on November 12, 2007, 06:28:11 AM
Quote from: wiiboychris on November 10, 2007, 10:27:24 AM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on November 09, 2007, 10:18:22 PM
Are you Sonic fans not satisfied that atleast Sonic is in?!!!! >:(  Why do you want more Sonic characters?  You already got the blue hedgehog who doesn't wear pants!!  :D
But we need Amy or Cream, because they ARE in clothes!
Would they seriously make it Brawl?   >:( I dought it.  Before they think about more third parties they should consider what NINTENDO characters deserve to be in because this is a NINTENDO game.  This isn't Sonic Battle or whatever it's called, it's Nintendo's Fighter.  I thought the third parties would stop after Sonic got in but I was wrong.  I don't think I can take any of this!!!   :'( 
Title: Re: Should Shadow be playable?
Post by: Skilliam on November 12, 2007, 09:03:28 PM
Hell No lol  ::)