News:

UH SOMETHING BROKE HANG ON

Main Menu

Characters that were cut should have at least been ATs or Pokeballs.

Started by Daft Pink, March 29, 2008, 12:39:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Daft Pink

Who agrees? I think they should at least have been given a spot as an AT or Pokeball. Discuss.

Tupin

Dr. Mario: Yeah, he should have been an AT.

Roy: He would have least been in the game in some way...  :(

Mewtwo: Maybe they would actually make him powerful.

Pichu: I'm not so sure....

Young Link: He lives on in a  playable character, if you know what I mean.  ;)


Quote from: SkyMyl
Tuppy frightens me with his knowledge of legacy technology.

Daft Pink

Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on March 29, 2008, 12:49:05 PM
Dr. Mario: Yeah, he should have been an AT.

Roy: He would have least been in the game in some way...  :(

Mewtwo: Maybe they would actually make him powerful.

Pichu: I'm not so sure....

Young Link: He lives on in a  playable character, if you know what I mean.  ;)
Yeah, about Young Link, I don't really consider him as gone from Brawl because [spoiler]Toon Link is pretty much the same[/spoiler]

Cornwad

Dr. Mario should have been an AT. At least he and Roy have songs.

Kilroy

Dr. Mario should have been playable. Now none of the Mario characters have clones :(
1984 WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN INSTRUCTION NOT MANUAL
"yes you are anusface, but i am better than!!" - taw, steam forums
 FOR NSF MASCOT

Gwen Khan

Quote from: Olimar on March 29, 2008, 01:16:39 PM
Dr. Mario should have been playable. Now none of the Mario characters have clones :(

and thats a bad thing? Dr. Mario should at least been a alt costume, and Mewtwo and Pichu should have been Pokeballs, and Roy an AT