Look at title.
I think it would be better if they would film it normally.
Gives it a more realistic feel. Having the camera sit still makes the monster look REALLY fake and boring.
On another note.
BLARGHGHGH
(http://i32.tinypic.com/nh1ljb.gif)
No.
They did the same thing with Children of Men [which would have been better it they didn't do so,because it made me dizzy]
For the way the plot of the movie was set up (as a military evidence tape they found in central park after the attack) it worked fantastically.
Now, if it had been a really heavily scripted movie, the freehand camera approach would have been terrible.
Quote from: Wexx on February 13, 2008, 03:08:16 PM
For the way the plot of the movie was set up (as a military evidence tape they found in central park after the attack) it worked fantastically.
Now, if it had been a really heavily scripted movie, the freehand camera approach would have been terrible.
I agree
For movies where the realistic factor and general mayhem are so high that they need to be conveyed in the most effective manner, I say the home video technique is great. For anything else, there's Mastercard regular professional filming.
Quote from: Zovistograt on February 23, 2008, 10:19:05 PM
For movies where the realistic factor and general mayhem are so high that they need to be conveyed in the most effective manner, I say the home video technique is great. For anything else, there's Mastercard regular professional filming.
I see what you did there! :robottongue: