So, apparently, once I got 150 Pokemon on Spotpass, it flat-out stopped working. Now, initially, this would seem like an intended design; I mean, there are only 150 Pokemon in the Unova Dex, so it would make sense for it to just stop there. However, this dex actually has room for all of the new Pokemon up through Kyurem, including alternate forms, meaning I should have 164 total.
So, does anyone know how I can get the missing 14 Pokemon/alt forms in my dex?
I'm missing Pansear, Simisear, Panpour, Simipour, female Unfezant, Garbador, all Deerling and Sawsbuck forms except spring, and both male jellyfish.
Never mind: http://www.serebii.net/pokedex3d/exclusives.shtml (http://www.serebii.net/pokedex3d/exclusives.shtml)
Apparently, all gender differences, elemental monkeys, and deer forms are exclusives, meaning each 3DS can only get one of each from the internet and must acquire the others irl.
Good thing I don't know anyone irl with a 3DS. :|
I know. Fucking stupid on Nintendo's part. Thanks for assuming your handheld would fly off the shelves and everyone would own one. Geh, I hate poop like this, it's why version exclusives just plain never flew with me and annoyed the crap out of me.
All will change once the price drops and Christmas season kicks in. More people will have the version exclusives.
That's silly to the silliest degree.
why are you guys even trying to finish this
seems like a huge waste of time tbh
Quote from: Custom on August 09, 2011, 08:04:30 PM
why are you guys even trying to finish this
seems like a huge waste of time tbh
So we can be rad.
Quote from: Neerb on August 09, 2011, 09:24:39 PM
So we can be rad.
i have that
way cooler than that 3ds pokemon thing
Quote from: Custom on August 09, 2011, 10:22:42 PM
i have that
way cooler than that 3ds pokemon thing
Silly Custom, using an outdated model.
Quote from: MooglePlayerChris on August 10, 2011, 09:46:38 AM
Silly Custom, using an outdated model.
Well according to you nothing's good unless it came out under 2 years ago and there's no newer version available.
Quote from: Kayo on August 10, 2011, 10:51:58 AM
Well according to you nothing's good unless it came out under 2 years ago and there's no newer version available.
Try twelve years ago.
Quote from: MooglePlayerChris on August 10, 2011, 11:40:24 AM
Try twelve years ago.
The Game Boy color existed over 12 years ago and I still use mine.
Quote from: Kayo on August 10, 2011, 01:28:23 PM
The Game Boy color existed over 12 years ago and I still use mine.
And it's outdated; you could use a Game Boy Advance for all the same purposes plus more.
Quote from: Custom on August 09, 2011, 08:04:30 PM
why are you guys even trying to finish this
seems like a huge waste of time tbh
Eh, it's something to do on the 3DS until SOMETHING comes out. And to be honest, I get three free a day when all I have to do is turn it on. So when you're so close to "finishing" it's kind of a dick move to pull stuff like that. It'd be like putting Stars in Mario Galaxy 1 or 2 that required the use of the second player option.
Not the biggest deal ever I admit, but annoying still.
Quote from: Nayrman on August 10, 2011, 04:19:47 PM
Eh, it's something to do on the 3DS until SOMETHING comes out. And to be honest, I get three free a day when all I have to do is turn it on. So when you're so close to "finishing" it's kind of a dick move to pull stuff like that. It'd be like putting Stars in Mario Galaxy 1 or 2 that required the use of the second player option.
Not the biggest deal ever I admit, but annoying still.
And the controllers cost $170.
Oh gosh, I just got scared for the Wii U.
Quote from: Neerb on August 10, 2011, 04:21:56 PM
And the controllers cost $170.
Oh gosh, I just got scared for the Wii U.
Price isn't an issue for me if I start saving money the moment they announce something new. It really works.
Quote from: MooglePlayerChris on August 10, 2011, 04:23:42 PM
Price isn't an issue for me if I start saving money the moment they announce something new. It really works.
Except you should care about pricing because if companies overcharge massively and you buy it it gives them no incentive to change. *shrugs*
Quote from: Nayrman on August 10, 2011, 04:29:07 PM
Except you should care about pricing because if companies overcharge massively and you buy it it gives them no incentive to change. *shrugs*
Which I do.
Quote from: Neerb on August 10, 2011, 02:40:03 PM
And it's outdated; you could use a Game Boy Advance for all the same purposes plus more.
But then you get either huge black sidebars on the screen or everything's all stretched.
But that doesn't mean it's not GOOD. Also, nostalgia value.
Quote from: Kayo on August 10, 2011, 06:36:31 PM
But then you get either huge black sidebars on the screen or everything's all stretched.
But that doesn't mean it's not GOOD. Also, nostalgia value.
Oh yeah, I forgot, Gameboy Colors came with multi-colored lava lamps on the side of the screen. :|
You sound like one of those people who whines about wide-screen movies.
But yeah, I guess I can understand keeping it for nostalgia value.
Quote from: Neerb on August 10, 2011, 07:20:12 PM
Oh yeah, I forgot, Gameboy Colors came with multi-colored lava lamps on the side of the screen. :|
You sound like one of those people who whines about wide-screen movies.
But yeah, I guess I can understand keeping it for nostalgia value.
I meant the on-screen sidebars, dumbass. Also, widescreen movies aren't just regular moves disproportionately stretched horizontally. Your entire post had nothing to do with anything I was saying.
Quote from: Kayo on August 11, 2011, 12:41:18 AM
I meant the on-screen sidebars, dumbass. Also, widescreen movies aren't just regular moves disproportionately stretched horizontally. Your entire post had nothing to do with anything I was saying.
My widescreen comment
was referring to the on-screen sidebars. I'm saying you're complaining about something that in no way affects the visual presentation of the actual game content, just like people who complain about widescreen movies because of the black bars on the top and sides.
Quote from: Neerb on August 11, 2011, 08:58:10 AM
My widescreen comment was referring to the on-screen sidebars. I'm saying you're complaining about something that in no way affects the visual presentation of the actual game content, just like people who complain about widescreen movies because of the black bars on the top and sides.
I like the Game Boy Color because that's what I played back when those games are current. I don't like when I play a game that doesn't fill the screen because it's silly and there's no need to play it that way if I can still play it the old fashioned way.
And that is also why I prefer to play GBA games on my SP rather than my DS. It just feels a lot better when the whole screen is filled.
Quote from: Kayo on August 11, 2011, 09:14:19 AM
I like the Game Boy Color because that's what I played back when those games are current. I don't like when I play a game that doesn't fill the screen because it's silly and there's no need to play it that way if I can still play it the old fashioned way.
And that is also why I prefer to play GBA games on my SP rather than my DS. It just feels a lot better when the whole screen is filled.
On the second note, I tried that, but the DS backlight (or at least, the DS Lite backlight) makes the games much brighter, more colorful, and all-around better-looking. I can get over the side-bars for that.
Quote from: Neerb on August 11, 2011, 09:18:52 AM
On the second note, I tried that, but the DS backlight (or at least, the DS Lite backlight) makes the games much brighter, more colorful, and all-around better-looking. I can get over the side-bars for that.
With the DS it isn't so much sidebars as a black border surrounding the entire screen. Plus it leaves one of your screens completely useless, and the DS is just unnecessarily big to be carrying around just to play a GBA game, which sticks out a half inch from Slot B anyway.
And that's another thing. I don't exactly love holding my SP with a giant GBC cartridge protruding toward me.
Kayo, quit complaining about dumb things.
Quote from: Super on August 11, 2011, 07:46:46 PM
Kayo, quit complaining about dumb things.
Whoa there. The Gameboy isn't dumb.
i would like this if it had all the pokemon and not just the ugly reject 5th gen pokemon
Quote from: Custom on August 12, 2011, 01:59:59 AM
i would like this if it had all the pokemon and not just the ugly reject 5th gen pokemon
This (except I still kinda like it).
I want an update for all 649.
Quote from: Custom on August 12, 2011, 01:59:59 AM
i would like this if it had all the pokemon and not just the ugly reject 5th gen pokemon
And here I thought you loved Scraggy.
I like 5th gen pokemon better than 4th gen, to be honest. But I think 3rd gen even is above 5th. Then again I loved the pokemon from that gen donthateme
Quote from: MooglePlayerChris on August 12, 2011, 08:14:31 AM
And here I thought you loved Scraggy.
that and haxorus
oh man two out of like 150 thanks gamefreak or creaturesmonsters or whatever
also kayo i liked third gen
4th was okay... i guess.... :(
i liked luxray or whatever
You will suffer great pain for not liking Zebstrika.
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on August 14, 2011, 04:12:22 AM
You will suffer great pain for not liking Zebstrika.
One of the many slaps in the face GameFreak has delivered recently.
"Look, a ZEBRA Pokemon, and it's freaking ELECTRIC!"
"Oh, wait, it's completely useless in actual gameplay. So much for that."
The worst though is definitely Heatmor. We finally get an anteater, and not only is it useless in stats and movepool, but it looks stupid and has an awful type.
Quote from: Custom on August 14, 2011, 01:24:38 AM
that and haxorus
oh man two out of like 150 thanks gamefreak or creaturesmonsters or whatever
also kayo i liked third gen
4th was okay... i guess.... :(
i liked luxray or whatever
3rd gen was awesome and people only hated it because it wasn't Gen 1 and 2. Gen 3 had some crazy new designs (Mawile, Exploud, etc.) that the Gen2fags couldn't handle.
Also that thing that looks like a Luvdisc evo should have been a Luvdisc evo. Not that I like either it or luvdisc but now we have two pink heart-shaped useless water types that aren't even related.
Luxray was one of the few Gen IVs that I actually liked. If only it didn't fail in battle. Now it has Wild Charge, but I still would have liked it to be Electric/Dark.
Quote from: Neerb on August 14, 2011, 10:44:23 AM
One of the many slaps in the face GameFreak has delivered recently.
"Look, a ZEBRA Pokemon, and it's freaking ELECTRIC!"
"Oh, wait, it's completely useless in actual gameplay. So much for that."
The worst though is definitely Heatmor. We finally get an anteater, and not only is it useless in stats and movepool, but it looks stupid and has an awful type.
I'm more mad over Braviary since you basically can't use it until you beat the game. IT'S A FUCKING EAGLE! WHY WOULD YOU DANGLE SOMETHING THAT AWESOME IN FRONT OF US LIKE THAT!?!
And it was Normal/Flying, which adds injury to insult. It should have been Fighting/Flying. STAB Close Combat and Brave Bird? Hell yeah! Game Freak needs to stop with the intercourse ing trolling.
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on August 14, 2011, 08:38:17 PM
I'm more mad over Braviary since you basically can't use it until you beat the game. IT'S A FUCKING EAGLE! WHY WOULD YOU DANGLE SOMETHING THAT AWESOME IN FRONT OF US LIKE THAT!?!
And it was Normal/Flying, which adds injury to insult. It should have been Fighting/Flying. STAB Close Combat and Brave Bird? Hell yeah! Game Freak needs to stop with the intercourse ing trolling.
Like how in Gold and Silver you couldn't get a Houndour until Kanto? They like seeing us suffer.
Quote from: Kayo on August 14, 2011, 10:12:19 PM
Like how in Gold and Silver you couldn't get a Houndour until Kanto? They like seeing us suffer.
At least in that case you could trade it. Rufflet evolves at level 55, and you'd normally have a mid-to-late 40's team when you beat the game. (Well, assuming to have something to take care of that intercourse ing overpowered Hydreigon.)
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on August 14, 2011, 10:34:22 PM
At least in that case you could trade it. Rufflet evolves at level 55, and you'd normally have a mid-to-late 40's team when you beat the game. (Well, assuming to have something to take care of that intercourse ing overpowered Hydreigon.)
EVERYTHING evolves way too late in black and White. I mean seriously. Larvesta is a Larvesta until level 59? That's awful. Things should evolve once before level 50 at least. I remember when Rhyhorn not evolving at all until level 42 seemed like a while.
Quote from: Kayo on August 14, 2011, 10:44:58 PM
EVERYTHING evolves way too late in black and White. I mean seriously. Larvesta is a Larvesta until level 59? That's awful. Things should evolve once before level 50 at least. I remember when Rhyhorn not evolving at all until level 42 seemed like a while.
Before I got to the Hydreigon, I thought it was a balance measure. Then once I saw that thing
nine levels before it's supposed to evolve, I realized that it was GF trolling taken to a whole new level.
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on August 15, 2011, 08:09:17 AM
Before I got to the Hydreigon, I thought it was a balance measure. Then once I saw that thing nine levels before it's supposed to evolve, I realized that it was GF trolling taken to a whole new level.
Oh please, they've done this way before with Falkner's Pidgeotto.
Quote from: MooglePlayerChris on August 15, 2011, 10:46:15 AM
Oh please, they've done this way before with Falkner's Pidgeotto.
There's a difference between a Pidgeotto and a Hydreigon with Dragon Pulse, Fire Blast, Surf, and Focus Blast. And don't bring up the Dragonites; those at least have a 4x weakness to Ice.
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on August 15, 2011, 11:03:08 AM
There's a difference between a Pidgeotto and a Hydreigon with Dragon Pulse, Fire Blast, Surf, and Focus Blast. And don't bring up the Dragonites; those at least have a 4x weakness to Ice.
3/4 of Dragon Pokemon are super weak to Ice.
Quote from: MooglePlayerChris on August 15, 2011, 11:16:18 AM
3/4 of Dragon Pokemon are super weak to Ice.
I know. The problem is that Hydreigon isn't one of them.
Quote from: MooglePlayerChris on August 15, 2011, 11:16:18 AM
3/4 of Dragon Pokemon are super weak to Ice.
Uh, no. Out of the 29 Dragon-type Pokemon in existence, only 9 of them have a 4x weakness to Ice. If you factor out all but fully-evolved Pokemon, you get this:
(http://gyazo.com/8412d1574e58ef3128ae02f7baf1df88.png)
As you can see, 6 out of a total of 18 fully-evolved Dragon Pokemon have a 4x weakness to ice. That's less than HALF of your "3/4" figure.
You don't have an argument there. Not only is your information INACCURATE, it's IRRELEVANT. That in no was justifies having a Hydreigon 9 levels underleveled. You know what? You grab an Ice-Pokemon, and go play Black or White and let me know how it does against that Hydreigon. You're not allowed to use anything on Hydreigon except that Ice type. You get to pick between the ice cream come and the polar bear. According to you Ice will protect you against 75% of the dragons you face, so you should do just fine.
Quote from: Kayo on August 15, 2011, 12:14:05 PM
Uh, no. Out of the 29 Dragon-type Pokemon in existence, only 9 of them have a 4x weakness to Ice. If you factor out all but fully-evolved Pokemon, you get this:
(http://gyazo.com/8412d1574e58ef3128ae02f7baf1df88.png)
As you can see, 6 out of a total of 18 fully-evolved Dragon Pokemon have a 4x weakness to ice. That's less than HALF of your "3/4" figure.
You don't have an argument there. Not only is your information INACCURATE, it's IRRELEVANT. That in no was justifies having a Hydreigon 9 levels underleveled. You know what? You grab an Ice-Pokemon, and go play Black or White and let me know how it does against that Hydreigon. You're not allowed to use anything on Hydreigon except that Ice type. You get to pick between the ice cream come and the polar bear. According to you Ice will protect you against 75% of the dragons you face, so you should do just fine.
To be fair, he might not have counted legendaries. However, then it's 5/9 so he'd still be wrong. Also, you forgot Cryogonal.
(http://archives.bulbagarden.net/media/upload/0/0d/Spr_5b_615.png)
And darn. I just double checked, and it was actually 10 levels, not 9. WTF Game Freak?
Quote from: Kayo on August 15, 2011, 12:14:05 PM
Uh, no. Out of the 29 Dragon-type Pokemon in existence, only 9 of them have a 4x weakness to Ice. If you factor out all but fully-evolved Pokemon, you get this:
(http://gyazo.com/8412d1574e58ef3128ae02f7baf1df88.png)
As you can see, 6 out of a total of 18 fully-evolved Dragon Pokemon have a 4x weakness to ice. That's less than HALF of your "3/4" figure.
You don't have an argument there. Not only is your information INACCURATE, it's IRRELEVANT. That in no was justifies having a Hydreigon 9 levels underleveled. You know what? You grab an Ice-Pokemon, and go play Black or White and let me know how it does against that Hydreigon. You're not allowed to use anything on Hydreigon except that Ice type. You get to pick between the ice cream come and the polar bear. According to you Ice will protect you against 75% of the dragons you face, so you should do just fine.
Calm down, he didn't call you slut, he said there are a lot of Dragons weak to Ice. Don't get angry about an inaccurate forum post.
Hydreigon's weak to fighting anyway. If you caught a Throh or Sawk or Condeldurr somewhere, you probably were okay.
Quote from: Rayquarian on August 15, 2011, 03:19:27 PM
Hydreigon's weak to fighting anyway. If you caught a Throh or Sawk or Condeldurr somewhere, you probably were okay.
I didn't get one of them because I chose Tepig as my starter. Getting hit by that Surf was the first time I regretted it.
Sawk could be an option since Throh doesn't have Sturdy, but I doubt that could even help. Those two are boring to me anyway.
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on August 15, 2011, 12:46:08 PM
To be fair, he might not have counted legendaries. However, then it's 5/9 so he'd still be wrong. Also, you forgot Cryogonal.
(http://archives.bulbagarden.net/media/upload/0/0d/Spr_5b_615.png)
And darn. I just double checked, and it was actually 10 levels, not 9. WTF Game Freak?
Poor snowflake. Your Sp. Def and Speed are awesome, but a single physical hit kills you and you're impossible to find if it's not Winter.
Quote from: Neerb on August 15, 2011, 01:14:50 PM
Calm down, he didn't call you slut, he said there are a lot of Dragons weak to Ice. Don't get angry about an inaccurate forum post.
You're one to talk. Every time I see a post of yours it makes me want to strangle a kitten.
Quote from: Rayquarian on August 15, 2011, 03:19:27 PM
Hydreigon's weak to fighting anyway. If you caught a Throh or Sawk or Condeldurr somewhere, you probably were okay.
But all the fighting types in Gen V suck except for Scrafty
Which is how I beat Hydreigon.
I lost the first fight against that thing, but I think Samurott ultimately Blizzarded it to death (with the help of some healing items and Thunderwaves, if I recall).
Despite this gen's large focus on Fighting types, my team was completely devoid of them... kind of a bad move in retrospect, as I definitely could have made room on my team. Stupid Zebstrika, despite all my training, never was able to pull his freaking weight; I had to rely on Archeops and Victini most of the game, with Liligant being my trump card when everyone else was down (Sleep Powder + Butterfly Dance + Giga Drain > every single cpu outside of the subway).
Quote from: Neerb on August 15, 2011, 06:54:29 PM
I lost the first fight against that thing, but I think Samurott ultimately Blizzarded it to death (with the help of some healing items and Thunderwaves, if I recall).
Despite this gen's large focus on Fighting types, my team was completely devoid of them... kind of a bad move in retrospect, as I definitely could have made room on my team. Stupid Zebstrika, despite all my training, never was able to pull his freaking weight; I had to rely on Archeops and Victini most of the game, with Liligant being my trump card when everyone else was down (Sleep Powder + Butterfly Dance + Giga Drain > every single cpu outside of the subway).
Go pit that Lilligant against the Champion's Volcarona before you claim that it can beat every "CPU" outside the Subway.
DISGUSTING
Well you're not supposed to stick your whole head in there.