Zelda Wii details?

[Doodle]

MM was supposed to be similar. It was a direct sequel.

Not really. It was a direct sequel, but it wasn't supposed to be an OoT rehash.
You can tell they tried to be different, with the 3-days, more in-depth characters, etc.

[dawnwolfNxhoj]

This game will be a Majora's Mask version for the Wii. If it's not Hyrule, then it's different.

true, but there are other worlds of Zelda. like the lands in the oracle series and the island from link's awakening. this new Zelda could be a spiritually sequel to one of these past titles, or  be completely new from any other Zelda

[Dorgannn]

I just hope it's something completely unexpected/original.

[Zero]

At this point I've began to have the expectations that I have for Mega Man games when it comes to Zelda games.

"If it ain't broke don't fix it" because let's face it, most people don't play games in either franchise for their plots(except for the battle network games, doesn't count). It's the gameplay I'm paying for when it comes to both franchises.

Frankly if they pull off fun dungeons in this new Zelda I won't care if it's another "copy of OoT". I loved Twilight Princess even though it was probably the easiest game I've played in the last 5 years.

[Custom]

I just hope it's something completely unexpected/original.

Why original?

[Thirdkoopa]

Why original?

Because when Nintendo puts some originality attempts outside of art design into the series it can actually turn out good - Just depends on how excessive you are with it. Hi Majora's Mask.