Yeah I kind of only found out about May 21st like THAT WEEK, so we're bound to have at least one more before December 2012.
So what will they come up with next?
2013 ends with 13, last digits which are related to Friday 13th. 13 is bad luck, so WORLD IS GOING TO GO BOOM!
Quote from: MooglePlayerChris on June 17, 2011, 02:37:07 PM
2013 ends with 13, last digits which are related to Friday 13th. 13 is bad luck, so WORLD IS GOING TO GO BOOM!
But that's AFTER 2012, I'm talking about in the mean time.
...Oh, in that case, I'd like to say I don't want to waste time with this thing. It's 2000 nonsense again.
The world ends with you.
Quote from: Super on June 17, 2011, 03:00:17 PM
The world ends with you.
(http://www.nintendo-ds-roms.com/img/roms/top/the+world+ends+with+you.jpg)
I will cause the world to end.
Like
Thi
When some other radical of some organized religion says it will.
Quote from: MooglePlayerChris on June 17, 2011, 02:50:43 PM
...Oh, in that case, I'd like to say I don't want to waste time with this thing. It's 2000 nonsense again.
False.
While much of 2000 was unnecessary panic, "Y2K" was a legitimate fear caused by the idea that computers would not be able to comprehend the time change, resulting in planes falling from the sky, the stock market crashing, and effectively sending us back decades if not more; thankfully, most were able to handle it, and the immense preparations that were made before hand allowed those that wouldn't have handled it to be upgraded in time.
2012, on the other hand, has absolutely zero precedence whatsoever; the surprisingly intelligent Mayans created an accurate calender that ran all the way up to the year 2012 AD (although it obviously was not called that on their calender), and that's as far as they got, which of course was far more than they needed anyway. However, when it was discovered, some group of idiots out there decided that it wasn't just the end of the calender; it was a prophecy, and the calender ended there because the Mayans "knew" that would be the last year.
Anyway, the moron who claimed the rapture would happen in May has now postponed it to October or something like that, so we'll be having another "end of the world" very soon. Honestly, it's people like him that make Christians look stereotypically stupid; JESUS HIMSELF said that ONLY GOD knows when the rapture will happen, meaning anyone, "Christian" or not, who claims to know otherwise is either ignorant or a troll.
Quote from: Neerb on June 18, 2011, 12:07:13 AM
False.
While much of 2000 was unnecessary panic, "Y2K" was a legitimate fear caused by the idea that computers would not be able to comprehend the time change, resulting in planes falling from the sky, the stock market crashing, and effectively sending us back decades if not more; thankfully, most were able to handle it, and the immense preparations that were made before hand allowed those that wouldn't have handled it to be upgraded in time.
This makes sense, to an extent. It seems preposterous to think that a computer couldn't jump from 1999 to 2000 safely. However, remember that technology back then was 11 years more primitive. Windows 98 was the big, new OS.
I wasn't around back then to have been able to put much thought into it at the time. Well, I was around... just five. Maybe it was a matter of thoughts that the basic computer system hadn't been programmed to continue time into the 2,000th year. Looking back now it seems silly, but you never know. Were the people of yester-century concerned with that? Maybe. Did they think that the older computers from the 80s or whenever weren't programmed to go past 1999, and only the new ones were? Maybe. Did they think that anything using outdated computer software would at the very least hiccup or reset itself at 00:00 on 1 Jan 2000? Sure. The resetting thing does not sound too preposterous considering the level of computer technology.
Nevertheless, it probably comes down to this. One person believes this as a worst-case scenario that has less than a 1% chance of happening. Then the rumor spreads that there "could possibly" be a catastrophe. Then that is twisted and exaggerated to "imminent doom". It's all progression. And people underestimating the intelligence of computers, really. I think the date change would not possibly cause a problem. And that's what happened.
It won't.
World's gonna explode yesterday
Harold Camping, the guy who came up with the May 21, 2011 date, has been saying that he made a miscalculation and that that date was only a "spiritual" apocalypse. Now he says that the apocalypse is some time in October. If I recall correctly, it might be the 21st of the month again.
Of course, he's been wrong several times before his May 21, 2011 prediction, so--forgetting the fact that he's a total hack--I don't think he'll be right this time.
If anything is gonna end the world, its gonna be us. I mean look, tons of people make a BIG deal out of this kind of thing, when most of it is a Hoax. Back in 1992 the same guy predicted something was going to happen, but then he miscalculated, Hoax, Like what Neerb said with the Y2K Theory, Hoax, June 6th, 2006 aka (6/6/06) Hoax, and now the May 21, 2011 Rapture theory, its all a hoax.
If anything is gonna end the world, its not gonna be some.....OH MY GODZ A FIRE BALL IN THE SKY AND IS COMING DOWN INTO THE CITY RUN!!! 100,000,000,000 / 1 chance of happening event. If anything is going to end the world, its gonna be us. Us as in Human beings. We're the most power hungry, Resource dependent, and the most corrupt life form on the planet.
Listen, the only thing thats coming close to our planet is in 2029, which is going to be a meteor, which is going to pass right by earth, but its going to be caught by the gravitational pull and return seven years later in 2036, no meteor or any outside space thing is coming at us in 2012
Quote from: Kayo on June 18, 2011, 07:46:15 PM
This makes sense, to an extent. It seems preposterous to think that a computer couldn't jump from 1999 to 2000 safely. However, remember that technology back then was 11 years more primitive. Windows 98 was the big, new OS.
I wasn't around back then to have been able to put much thought into it at the time. Well, I was around... just five. Maybe it was a matter of thoughts that the basic computer system hadn't been programmed to continue time into the 2,000th year. Looking back now it seems silly, but you never know. Were the people of yester-century concerned with that? Maybe. Did they think that the older computers from the 80s or whenever weren't programmed to go past 1999, and only the new ones were? Maybe. Did they think that anything using outdated computer software would at the very least hiccup or reset itself at 00:00 on 1 Jan 2000? Sure. The resetting thing does not sound too preposterous considering the level of computer technology.
Nevertheless, it probably comes down to this. One person believes this as a worst-case scenario that has less than a 1% chance of happening. Then the rumor spreads that there "could possibly" be a catastrophe. Then that is twisted and exaggerated to "imminent doom". It's all progression. And people underestimating the intelligence of computers, really. I think the date change would not possibly cause a problem. And that's what happened.
I can't quite remember exactly why, but the whole Y2K thing was caused by a deficiency in programming. I can't remember the details, but if I remember correctly it was because, then, computers tabulated time based upon the last 2 digits of the year, and output that as 19-- (the -
s being the last 2 digits computed). So, the jump from 99 to the next year might have a computational issue, or it may throw the computer off, because now it thinks it's 1900 (if I recall correctly, it was the latter issue).
Many feared this would cause issues, hence the reason why they now read the year as the full number, and can compute beyond the 1900's (i.e. instead of 99 it's now 1999, or instead of 11, it's read as either 1911 or 2011 now).
Or in that case I could be completely wrong...I didn't do the best on the computer history part of programming...
Quote from: Roc on June 19, 2011, 07:03:33 AM
Listen, the only thing thats coming close to our planet is in 2029, which is going to be a meteor, which is going to pass right by earth, but its going to be caught by the gravitational pull and return seven years later in 2036, no meteor or any outside space thing is coming at us in 2012
Yeah. And most cosmic debris that comes near our planet that actually ENTERS the atmosphere just burns up anyway before it can hit anything.
Quote from: Alisaihin on June 19, 2011, 07:23:15 AM
Or in that case I could be completely wrong...I didn't do the best on the computer history part of programming...Yeah. And most cosmic debris that comes near our planet that actually ENTERS the atmosphere just burns up anyway before it can hit anything.
This logic contradicts with the meteor theory on dinosaur extinction, and frankly, I know little to nothing on that matter so I have no stance on what wiped them out.
Quote from: Kayo on June 19, 2011, 04:15:38 PM
This logic contradicts with the meteor theory on dinosaur extinction, and frankly, I know little to nothing on that matter so I have no stance on what wiped them out.
It doesn't contradict it at all. Obviously little meteors/etc. will burn up in the atmosphere. If it's big enough, it won't burn up all the way.
Quote from: Doodle on June 19, 2011, 05:38:01 PM
It doesn't contradict it at all. Obviously little meteors/etc. will burn up in the atmosphere. If it's big enough, it won't burn up all the way.
What I'm saying is, who's to say that another huge meteor won't come and kill us?
If that's even what got rid of the dinos. I think I'd need to study that more but I don't want to.
Actually, I think if that DID happen, there's a few things we'd have to consider. For example, if it landed in the ocean, it probably wouldn't be as destructive as if it landed on land. would it unleash huge tsunamis though? I don't know. That certainly wouldn't be good. But if it landed on land, say, in an unpopulated area such as the vast Sahara Desert, the impact wouldn't cause the harm. If there were any resulting tremors or what have you (anyone who knows about this correct me if I'm wrong; I'm really just guessing) that might do some damage to further areas.
I think the problem would be the cloud of dust. I think that we have the technology to be able to handle that, though, in an emergency. Stay indoors, have people with protective gear delivering supplies or whatever must be done if it's a true emergency. Bottom line is, we'd be able to get through it better than the dinos.
Quote from: Roc on June 19, 2011, 06:50:08 AM
If anything is gonna end the world, its gonna be us. I mean look, tons of people make a BIG deal out of this kind of thing, when most of it is a Hoax. Back in 1992 the same guy predicted something was going to happen, but then he miscalculated, Hoax, Like what Neerb said with the Y2K Theory, Hoax, June 6th, 2006 aka (6/6/06) Hoax, and now the May 21, 2011 Rapture theory, its all a hoax.
If anything is gonna end the world, its not gonna be some.....OH MY GODZ A FIRE BALL IN THE SKY AND IS COMING DOWN INTO THE CITY RUN!!! 100,000,000,000 / 1 chance of happening event. If anything is going to end the world, its gonna be us. Us as in Human beings. We're the most power hungry, Resource dependent, and the most corrupt life form on the planet.
Unless you're accusing the people who say those thing of just making it all up to stir things up, I don't think that "hoax" is the word you're looking for. The people who put out those warnings genuinely believed them to be true.
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on June 20, 2011, 12:05:15 PM
Unless you're accusing the people who say those thing of just making it all up to stir things up, I don't think that "hoax" is the word you're looking for. The people who put out those warnings genuinely believed them to be true.
And so do the people who believed in the rapture and everything. People are so closely tied with their religion that they would actually kill themself if they thought God told them too. In my opinion, that's when religion is just out of hand. I'm not one to criticize people on their beliefs, but that is really just too much.
Quote from: Kayo on June 20, 2011, 01:37:48 PM
And so do the people who believed in the rapture and everything. People are so closely tied with their religion that they would actually kill themself if they thought God told them too. In my opinion, that's when religion is just out of hand. I'm not one to criticize people on their beliefs, but that is really just too much.
I think that's more of a problem with people than religion.
Quote from: Hero_of_Darkness on June 20, 2011, 01:50:33 PM
I think that's more of a problem with people than religion.
I'm not blaming the religion, I'm blaming the people that follow it THAT CLOSELY. Religion should not take over a person's life THAT much, and people should know this, but they don't.
Quote from: Kayo on June 20, 2011, 01:51:29 PM
I'm not blaming the religion, I'm blaming the people that follow it THAT CLOSELY. Religion should not take over a person's life THAT much, and people should know this, but they don't.
Actually, religion IS supposed to take over a person's life THAT much; it's just that not every follower is as devout as they "should" be. I mean, if you just follow it half-heartedly, then it's not even a religion, it's just advice.
However, you are right in that the people are to blame; everyone has a choice to believe and do what they want (well, mentally anyway; physically, many are unfortunately forced to convert or die due to the culture in which they live).
Quote from: Neerb on June 20, 2011, 02:20:20 PM
Actually, religion IS supposed to take over a person's life THAT much; it's just that not every follower is as devout as they "should" be. I mean, if you just follow it half-heartedly, then it's not even a religion, it's just advice.
However, you are right in that the people are to blame; everyone has a choice to believe and do what they want (well, mentally anyway; physically, many are unfortunately forced to convert or die due to the culture in which they live).
Uh, no. Religion shouldn't precede logical decisions in everyday life. Like say you were supposed to go to work one day. You can't say home and use for an excuse "God told me to stay home".
Likewise you shouldn't let it affect your better judgment. If you want to believe the Earth was created in a week, go ahead. But don't jump off a building because you BELIEVE something that every logical conclusion, even common sense, contradicts.
Quote from: Kayo on June 20, 2011, 03:17:01 PM
Uh, no. Religion shouldn't precede logical decisions in everyday life. Like say you were supposed to go to work one day. You can't say home and use for an excuse "God told me to stay home".
Likewise you shouldn't let it affect your better judgment. If you want to believe the Earth was created in a week, go ahead. But don't jump off a building because you BELIEVE something that every logical conclusion, even common sense, contradicts.
Says your point of view. ;)
You see, that's the point; what "should" or "shouldn't" be done is different in different people's minds. Now, don't get me wrong; I'm intelligent to know that there IS such thing as absolute truth, but frankly, not everyone has the same sense of what should and shouldn't be done. Why? Because of whatever their belief system is. The point is, not all religions are absolutely true, but nearly all religions are created to be followed AS IF they were true. Hinduism wasn't created because its creators wanted people to pick and choose parts of it; it was created because its creators wanted people to believe ALL of it.
Quote from: Neerb on June 20, 2011, 03:39:36 PM
Says your point of view. ;)
You see, that's the point; what "should" or "shouldn't" be done is different in different people's minds. Now, don't get me wrong; I'm intelligent to know that there IS such thing as absolute truth, but frankly, not everyone has the same sense of what should and shouldn't be done. Why? Because of whatever their belief system is. The point is, not all religions are absolutely true, but nearly all religions are created to be followed AS IF they were true. Hinduism wasn't created because its creators wanted people to pick and choose parts of it; it was created because its creators wanted people to believe ALL of it.
Says my point of view? If I decided to not show up for my job for a whole week, but told my boss "God said I should stay home from a week" he wouldn't buy it. And I'd be fired. Taking a week off using your vacation days or whatever is one thing, but that isn't a legitimate excuse.
Quote from: Kayo on June 20, 2011, 03:17:01 PM
Uh, no. Religion shouldn't precede logical decisions in everyday life.
But that's essentially the point.
Quote from: Kayo on June 20, 2011, 05:38:31 PM
Says my point of view? If I decided to not show up for my job for a whole week, but told my boss "God said I should stay home from a week" he wouldn't buy it. And I'd be fired. Taking a week off using your vacation days or whatever is one thing, but that isn't a legitimate excuse.
Again, not every view can be right at the same time, but if a person legitimately believed that their god wanted them to skip work, that would take higher priority for them; getting fired would be an unfortunate but "necessary" side-effect. In the mind of the person who follows said belief, that belief takes higher priority. So you see, religion "shouldn't" be top priority in life in the eyes of someone who doesn't follow said religion, but it "should" take top priority in life in the eyes of someone who does follow said religion. After all, if you
legitimately believed that the omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient creator told you to quit your job, the
logical decision would be to obey, since God would have a lot more control over you than your boss should you disobey.
The point is,
religions are designed for the purpose of being followed
religiously. Even if from an objective standpoint it's nonsense, from a subjective standpoint no religion should be followed half-heartedly. The reason a person follows a religion is because they think it's real and thus NEEDS to be followed. Obviously, no one can follow any moral code perfectly, but if you live a lifestyle of partially following a religion, you're a hypocrite and are frankly wasting everyone's time, including your own.
Quote from: Neerb on June 20, 2011, 08:28:36 PM
Again, not every view can be right at the same time, but if a person legitimately believed that their god wanted them to skip work, that would take higher priority for them; getting fired would be an unfortunate but "necessary" side-effect. In the mind of the person who follows said belief, that belief takes higher priority. So you see, religion "shouldn't" be top priority in life in the eyes of someone who doesn't follow said religion, but it "should" take top priority in life in the eyes of someone who does follow said religion. After all, if you legitimately believed that the omnipotent, omnipresent, omniscient creator told you to quit your job, the logical decision would be to obey, since God would have a lot more control over you than your boss should you disobey.
The point is, religions are designed for the purpose of being followed religiously. Even if from an objective standpoint it's nonsense, from a subjective standpoint no religion should be followed half-heartedly. The reason a person follows a religion is because they think it's real and thus NEEDS to be followed. Obviously, no one can follow any moral code perfectly, but if you live a lifestyle of partially following a religion, you're a hypocrite and are frankly wasting everyone's time, including your own.
Yes but it's bullpoop to let it precede everyday life to a destructive extent. Religions aren't designed to control your mind, and it's not half-hearted to not allow it to do such. It's a bit over the line for someone to allow religion to INTERFERE with their everyday life in a negative way. If they want to leave their job for a week for no reason other than a supernatural being "speaking" to them, fine for them. They just can't cry when they get fired. In this kind of world we live in now, that's just not acceptable. You wouldn't like it if you hired and paid someone that decided to just not work as much as your other employees, using a religious excuse. No religion is that intrusive, and no religion should be.
It'll end whenever the intercourse it feels like ending.
Quote from: Kayo on June 20, 2011, 09:25:30 PM
Religions aren't designed to control your mind
To an extent, yes, they are.
Quote from: Doodle on June 21, 2011, 10:20:37 AM
To an extent, yes, they are.
Only if you want it to "control your mind".
I'd say abandoning rational thought in favor of religion is a form of mind control.
Quote from: Super on June 21, 2011, 10:59:23 AM
I'd say abandoning rational thought in favor of religion is a form of mind control.
Tell me, then, what do you consider rational thought?
Quote from: Tahrann on June 21, 2011, 11:18:29 AM
Tell me, then, what do you consider rational thought?
Anything involving superstitions, definitely.
Quote from: Super on June 21, 2011, 12:39:16 PM
Anything involving superstitions, definitely.
/Sarcasm
To me, rational is something I can observe firsthand or hear the firsthand observation of others and has tested to be true time and time again. Anything beyond what can be observed comes down to the belief in the existence of the subject in question. Religion being mind control I think is something you said to have observed firsthand, but I believe that that thinking is in your belief system since I have not observed it firsthand.
U c wut I did thar?
Quote from: Super on June 21, 2011, 09:25:05 PM
What you talkin' 'bout, boy?
Edited post got edited btw.
Your logic is silly.
Quote from: Super on June 21, 2011, 10:17:33 PM
Your logic is silly.
I could say the same for yours.
Quote from: Tahrann on June 21, 2011, 10:33:08 PM
I could say the same for yours.
According to yours, opinions are irrational.
Quote from: Super on June 21, 2011, 10:38:48 PM
According to yours, opinions are irrational.
Is that your opinion on my post?
Quote from: Tahrann on June 21, 2011, 10:40:22 PM
Is that your opinion on my post?
Nope. That's just me finding flaws in your logic.
Quote from: Super on June 21, 2011, 10:42:50 PM
Nope. That's just me finding flaws in your logic.
Interesting, I though people just said that to try to make it look like they actually have the advantage. Musta been my imagination.
Quote from: Tahrann on June 21, 2011, 10:44:53 PM
Interesting, I though people just said that to try to make it look like they actually have the advantage. Musta been my imagination.
I have a distinct advantage. I'm not throwing out silliness.
Haha, I'm just talking out my ass.
Quote from: Super on June 21, 2011, 10:51:08 PM
Haha, I'm just talking out my ass.
I know, I just wanted to see what might make ya tick. I like seeing how other people think so that I can learn from their thought processes.
Quote from: Tahrann on June 21, 2011, 10:53:37 PM
I know, I just wanted to see what might make ya tick. I like seeing how other people think so that I can learn from their thought processes.
I like to mess with people.
Quote from: Super on June 21, 2011, 11:03:11 PM
I like to mess with people.
I know that as well, that is why there were no flame wars going on.
Quote from: Tahrann on June 21, 2011, 10:58:06 AM
Only if you want it to "control your mind".
Nobody wants anything to control their mind, but that doesn't stop it from doing so.
Quote from: Doodle on June 23, 2011, 10:08:00 PM
Nobody wants anything to control their mind, but that doesn't stop it from doing so.
Let me ask you this then, what is stopping you from being under some sort of mind control? Is it because you say you have free thought or logic? Because that might even be what you are only told you have while being manipulated. What I am saying is, just because you fall under the banner of "religion" does not make you automatically under its control just like if you were Atheistic or Agnostic it does not mean you are mind control free. I like to think for myself, but does that mean someone else is thinking for me?
Though I do agree with you that almost no one wants to be under the control of something or someone, but that does not always stop it from happening.
Religion is getting too complicated.
Free will is a laughable notion, but that debate is far too sophisticated for most of you.
Quote from: Zero on June 25, 2011, 01:07:30 PM
Free will is a laughable notion, but that debate is far too sophisticated for most of you.
Because you're exploding with sophistication.
The world is going to end yesterday.
Tahraan reminds me of phatyo and JrDude.
Quote from: Matt on June 25, 2011, 05:58:24 PM
Tahraan reminds me of phatyo and JrDude.
He's not phat or annoying enough.
Quote from: Kayo on June 25, 2011, 06:26:10 PM
He's not phat or annoying enough.
True, but he is a stubborn dumbass.
Quote from: Matt on June 25, 2011, 06:42:32 PM
True, but he is a stubborn dumbass.
Thank you, I try my best.
Quote from: Super on June 25, 2011, 01:25:25 PM
Because you're exploding with sophistication.
lol picturing someone exploding with sophistication made my day
Quote from: Zero on June 27, 2011, 01:50:22 AM
lol picturing someone exploding with sophistication made my day
Someone should somehow find a gif of this
Start looking. http://senorgif.memebase.com/ (http://senorgif.memebase.com/)
I wonder if there will be anything like this on 11/11/11. Not like the number 1 has any superstitious significance but you never know.
There are six ones. If you look at the slashes, they kind of look like ones, so this adds up to eight. 6 divided by eight is .666 repeating bar.
SATAN
Quote from: Super on June 30, 2011, 06:01:48 PM
There are six ones. If you look at the slashes, they kind of look like ones, so this adds up to eight. 6 divided by eight is .666 repeating bar.
SATAN
THE PROPHET HAS SPOKEN
Quote from: Super on June 30, 2011, 06:01:48 PM
There are six ones. If you look at the slashes, they kind of look like ones, so this adds up to eight. 6 divided by eight is .666 repeating bar.
SATAN
[spoiler]6/8 is .75.[/spoiler]
I was paying more attention to the number of ones. Knowing some of the Catholics we have these days, they might just see that as proof enough of the world ending.
Quote from: Kayo on June 30, 2011, 07:37:01 PM
I was paying more attention to the number of ones. Knowing some of the Catholics we have these days, they might just see that as proof enough of the world ending.
generalizations are fun
Quote from: Doodle on June 30, 2011, 07:38:12 PM
generalizations are fun
I said "some" of them.
But lately I've just grown to expect anything. Rapture day was a prime example. It just amazes me where they pull these numbers from.
Numbers is numbers, Doodle. They tell all. Obviously you don't get that 6/8 means nothing when it doesn't equal .666.
Quote from: Super on June 30, 2011, 07:40:43 PM
Numbers is numbers, Doodle. They tell all. Obviously you don't get that 6/8 means nothing when it doesn't equal .666.
Here's what you do.
11/11/11
There are 2 slashes
There are 3 Elevens.
Divide 2 by 3
you have .666
5 + 5 = 13
666=mark of the beast. When the anti-christ takes over, no one without this mysterious mark, which is somehow related to the number, will be able to do anything, thus you will need to swear loyalty to him to buy things, travel, etc. It's like we'll all be required by law to have barcodes on our foreheads or something to that effect.
That's all. What the date is according to our modern calendar has absolutely nothing at all to do with the end of the world.
Quote from: Neerb on July 01, 2011, 08:16:18 AM
666=mark of the beast. When the anti-christ takes over, no one without this mysterious mark, which is somehow related to the number, will be able to do anything, thus you will need to swear loyalty to him to buy things, travel, etc. It's like we'll all be required by law to have barcodes on our foreheads or something to that effect.
That's all. What the date is according to our modern calendar has absolutely nothing at all to do with the end of the world.
Yeah but the thing is, people still BELIEVE that certain coincidental dates = the end of the world.
Quote from: Kayo on June 30, 2011, 07:37:01 PM
I was paying more attention to the number of ones. Knowing some of the Catholics we have these days, they might just see that as proof enough of the world ending.
I don't know where you came up with Catholics believing in that, but you probably meant to mention fundamentalist Christians.
Quote from: Neerb on July 01, 2011, 08:16:18 AM
666=mark of the beast. When the anti-christ takes over, no one without this mysterious mark, which is somehow related to the number, will be able to do anything, thus you will need to swear loyalty to him to buy things, travel, etc. It's like we'll all be required by law to have barcodes on our foreheads or something to that effect.
That's all. What the date is according to our modern calendar has absolutely nothing at all to do with the end of the world.
You're very right. Somewhere in Revelations (i.e. a book of the Bible) it says that the Mark of the Beast must be on everyone's foreheads and the backs of their hands. Something like that.
Quote from: Kayo on July 01, 2011, 11:01:13 AM
Yeah but the thing is, people still BELIEVE that certain coincidental dates = the end of the world.
Those people are incompetent.
Quote from: Kayo on July 01, 2011, 11:01:13 AM
Yeah but the thing is, people still BELIEVE that certain coincidental dates = the end of the world.
People like to believe in things with little or no valid evidence backing them.
Well, most Americans will believe anything you tell them.
And that's how these things spread.
Quote from: Kayo on July 02, 2011, 05:13:46 PM
Well, most Americans will believe anything you tell them.
And that's how these things spread.
Not just America, but humanity. Make us a little something, add some facts to make it look legit, and then tell people it is the logical or right way to go.
Quote from: Tahrann on July 02, 2011, 10:03:13 PM
Not just America, but humanity. Make us a little something, add some facts to make it look legit, and then tell people it is the logical or right way to go.
Bill Gates bought out Nintendo.
Tahrann is highly intelligent.
^ Imagine if people believed that.
Quote from: Super on July 02, 2011, 10:13:08 PM
Tahrann is highly intelligent.
^ Imagine if people believed that.
Add some "facts".
Quote from: Super on July 02, 2011, 10:13:08 PM
Tahrann is highly intelligent.
^ Imagine if people believed that.
I'm honored that someone cared to spell my name right.
Quote from: Kayo on July 02, 2011, 10:14:43 PM
Add some "facts".
Alright, I will say that "it is a fact".
Quote from: Super on July 02, 2011, 10:23:19 PM
Alright, I will say that "it is a fact".
Super is god.
Quote from: Tahrann on July 03, 2011, 12:11:31 AM
Fixed.
I think we need some numbers, figures, and diagrams.
Quote from: Kayo on July 03, 2011, 12:37:52 AM
I think we need some numbers, figures, and diagrams.
Well, we have numbers, just no figures or diagrams. Then again, what are you paying me for, right?
Quote from: Tahrann on July 03, 2011, 12:41:56 AM
Well, we have numbers, just no figures or diagrams. Then again, what are you paying me for, right?
I thought we agreed not to talk about that in public.
Super wrote The Great Book of Dundleboof.
[spoiler]It's a fact.[/spoiler]
Quote from: Doodle on July 03, 2011, 12:08:02 PM
Super wrote The Great Book of Dundleboof.
[spoiler]It's a fact.[/spoiler]
A book, you say? Let's base a religion off it.
Quote from: Kayo on July 04, 2011, 04:40:29 PM
A book, you say? Let's base a religion off it.
Or call it a science.
Quote from: Tahrann on July 04, 2011, 09:47:43 PM
Or call it a science.
Lead countries by way of this book.
Quote from: Kayo on July 04, 2011, 09:58:19 PM
Lead countries by way of this book.
And let others know how much of a fool they are for not thinking the same way.
Quote from: Tahrann on July 04, 2011, 10:04:29 PM
And let others know how much of a fool they are for not thinking the same way.
Our country will dominate.
Quote from: Kayo on July 04, 2011, 10:27:22 PM
Our country will dominate.
To protect the world from devastation.
Quote from: Tahrann on July 05, 2011, 01:05:07 AM
To protect the world from devastation.
TO UNITE ALL PEOPLE WITHIN OUR NATION
Quote from: Kayo on July 05, 2011, 09:20:25 AM
TO UNITE ALL PEOPLE WITHIN OUR NATION
To denounce the evils of truth and love!
Quote from: Tahrann on July 05, 2011, 12:21:12 PM
To denounce the evils of truth and love!
TO EXTEND OUR REACH TO THE STARS ABOVE
Quote from: Kayo on July 05, 2011, 12:34:36 PM
TO EXTEND OUR REACH TO THE STARS ABOVE
Tahrann!
Quote from: Kayo on July 05, 2011, 01:18:40 PM
Kayo~
Team Super blasts off at the speed of light!
Quote from: Tahrann on July 05, 2011, 01:51:23 PM
Team Super blasts off at the speed of light!
SURRENDER NOW OR PREPARE TO FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
AND DIE
Quote from: Kayo on July 05, 2011, 04:40:29 PM
SURRENDER NOW OR PREPARE TO FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
AND DIE
"Silverhawk79! That's right!"
Thus sayeth in chapter 69 of the Great Book Of Dundleboof.
Quote from: Tahrann on July 05, 2011, 08:17:08 PM
"Silverhawk79! That's right!"
Thus sayeth in chapter 69 of the Great Book Of Dundleboof.
...
FUCK
August 4th or 5th when the US dollar will hit 0. And gold and silver shale retake there place as the global currency. Unless congress intercourse s over a couple of billionaires. Either way I'm safe :)
Quote from: phatyo on July 22, 2011, 12:12:53 AM
August 4th or 5th when the US dollar will hit 0. And gold and silver shale retake there place as the global currency. Unless congress intercourse s over a couple of billionaires. Either way I'm safe :)
You should kill yourself on August 3rd then since apparently the world's doomed to end the next day.
Quote from: phatyo on July 22, 2011, 12:12:53 AM
August 4th or 5th when the US dollar will hit 0. And gold and silver shale retake there place as the global currency. Unless congress intercourse s over a couple of billionaires. Either way I'm safe :)
what the intercourse
Quote from: Custom on July 27, 2011, 09:38:00 AM
what the intercourse
it's phatyo, are you surprised?
Quote from: Kayo on July 27, 2011, 12:41:36 PM
it's phatyo, are you surprised?
yes
that's actually the stupidest thing i've ever heard
Quote from: Custom on July 28, 2011, 10:33:52 AM
yes
that's actually the stupidest thing i've ever heard
okay
Quote from: Custom on July 28, 2011, 10:33:52 AM
yes
that's actually the stupidest thing i've ever heard
I don't know about that
phatyo has a lot of posts here
Quote from: Doodle on July 28, 2011, 07:43:31 PM
I don't know about that
phatyo has a lot of posts here
hey look you've reached 12,000.
oh
I missed my 12k get :(
Quote from: Doodle on July 28, 2011, 08:14:56 PM
oh
I missed my 12k get :(
Quick, delete 7 of your old po--
Wait, there's a recycling board here so I think the posts would still count.
The world? Idk. The US ends August 2 when the market collapses though. China's going to take over as the next super power. The States will be divided up among the remaining countries.
And we will all have tinfoil hats.
Quote from: Orgizirtee on July 31, 2011, 09:59:58 PM
The world? Idk. The US ends August 2 when the market collapses though. China's going to take over as the next super power. The States will be divided up among the remaining countries.
And we will all have tinfoil hats.
You're as bad as phatyo D:
Quote from: Kayo on July 31, 2011, 10:07:28 PM
You're as bad as phatyo D:
Quote from: Orgizirtee on July 31, 2011, 09:59:58 PM
The world? Idk. The US ends August 2 when the market collapses though. China's going to take over as the next super power. The States will be divided up among the remaining countries.
And we will all have tinfoil hats.
Quote from: Doodle on August 01, 2011, 01:17:57 PM
I take that back. But the first half of that was awful.
Quote from: Kayo on August 01, 2011, 01:22:29 PM
I take that back. But the first half of that was awful.
(http://i56.tinypic.com/2d7ddw5.jpg)
Doodle you're so intercourse ing difficult.
I'm just explaining what flew over your head with bold text and reaction images ヽ(´ー｀)ノ
Quote from: Doodle on August 02, 2011, 01:53:26 PM
I'm just explaining what flew over your head with bold text and reaction images ヽ(´ー｀)ノ
nothing can fly over my head, i'm tall.
Because things that fly typically don't fly higher than five feet from the ground.
Silverhawk can fly higher.