NSFCD

Generally Speaking => Power On => Topic started by: The Seventh on December 01, 2007, 12:57:01 PM

Poll
Question: Which is better (my only options, sorry)
Option 1: JPEG votes: 4
Option 2: Bitmap votes: 0
Option 3: Both are at the same level of suckiness. votes: 2
Title: Which is better?
Post by: The Seventh on December 01, 2007, 12:57:01 PM
Yes, this is a burning question...  I don't know which saves pictures as a better quality...

I want to know so my... picture for a certian project looks the best it can.
Title: Re: Which is better?
Post by: Lotos on December 01, 2007, 12:59:40 PM
I prefer PNG.  You can also copy the picture (ctrl+a then ctrl+c), save it as a  gif, then paste the picture and save again to get better quality pictures for animation.

Bitmap apparantly takes up a lot of space, or so I'm told, and JPEG may intercourse  up the picture quality.
Title: Re: Which is better?
Post by: Wolf on December 01, 2007, 01:01:20 PM
JPEG is a smaller file, but less quality. BMP is a bigger file, but better quality. I'd go with JPEG.
Title: Re: Which is better?
Post by: sonicdude164 on December 01, 2007, 01:07:04 PM
png

but out of those, jpeg
Title: Re: Which is better?
Post by: えっちーせんぱい on December 01, 2007, 01:10:08 PM
Bitmap preserves the colors perfectly, but has a rather large file size.


I say bitmap because jPegs are fuzzy.
Title: Re: Which is better?
Post by: Kaz on December 01, 2007, 01:13:05 PM
For bitmap users, I pose you a question: what the hell image would need that kind of preservation?

Use jpeg, though, as others have said before me, png is better in almost every case.
Title: Re: Which is better?
Post by: The Seventh on December 01, 2007, 02:22:42 PM
Quote from: Kazooie-Banjo on December 01, 2007, 01:13:05 PM
For bitmap users, I pose you a question: what the hell image would need that kind of preservation?

Use jpeg, though, as others have said before me, png is better in almost every case.
I know PNG is the best out there, but I have only those 2 choices for what I am going to do.

I guess I could use that kind of preservation, though...

Needless to say, it's for something that JPEG fuzziness would ruin a lot.