If Sakurai wanted him in, he wouldn't put him in the background, simple as that.
"They can easily take him out while someone is playing him."
I'm sure Sakurai just wouldn't put him in the background at all if he was gonna fight.
"But there's an Animal Crossing icon, so there's gonna be a Animal crossing Rep."
There's a DS icon too, think, who'd be playable for that?
"They can take him out of the background before the game releases."
I repeat, if Sakurai wanted him playable at all, he wouldn't of put him in the background.
"In SSBM, in Big Blue, you could ride on top of Captain Falcon's car and play with him at the same time"
Maybe someone else is driving it.
"Only Captain Falcon can drive it."
Proof that no one else can? and maybe there's an auto pilot.
"Face it, your arguements have no logic and blah didly blah, I'm right, you're wrong, blah didly blah blah."
K.
"Are you trying to start a flame war?"
No, but if you want one, bring it.
Quote from: JrDude on December 23, 2007, 08:22:04 PM
If Sakurai wanted him in, he wouldn't put him in the background, simple as that.
"They can easily take him out while someone is playing him."
I'm sure Sakurai just wouldn't put him in the background at all if he was gonna fight.
"But there's an Animal Crossing icon, so there's gonna be a Animal crossing Rep."
There's a DS icon too, think, who'd be playable for that?
"They can take him out of the background before the game releases."
I repeat, if Sakurai wanted him playable at all, he wouldn't of put him in the background.
"In SSBM, in Big Blue, you could ride on top of Captain Falcon's car and play with him at the same time"
Maybe someone else is driving it.
"Only Captain Falcon can drive it."
Proof that no one else can? and maybe there's an auto pilot.
"Face it, your arguements have no logic and blah didly blah, I'm right, you're wrong, blah didly blah blah."
K.
Sonic and King Dedede proves that anything is possible! :P
Quote from: Shujinco on December 23, 2007, 08:24:04 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 23, 2007, 08:22:04 PM
If Sakurai wanted him in, he wouldn't put him in the background, simple as that.
"They can easily take him out while someone is playing him."
I'm sure Sakurai just wouldn't put him in the background at all if he was gonna fight.
"But there's an Animal Crossing icon, so there's gonna be a Animal crossing Rep."
There's a DS icon too, think, who'd be playable for that?
"They can take him out of the background before the game releases."
I repeat, if Sakurai wanted him playable at all, he wouldn't of put him in the background.
"In SSBM, in Big Blue, you could ride on top of Captain Falcon's car and play with him at the same time"
Maybe someone else is driving it.
"Only Captain Falcon can drive it."
Proof that no one else can? and maybe there's an auto pilot.
"Face it, your arguements have no logic and blah didly blah, I'm right, you're wrong, blah didly blah blah."
K.
Sonic and King Dedede proves that anything is possible! :P
1. Sonic didn't have anything to do with anything I said.
2. King Dedede is in the background in a past stage when he wasn't playable, I beleive not all the stages will be returning.
Quote from: JrDude on December 23, 2007, 08:26:10 PM
Quote from: Shujinco on December 23, 2007, 08:24:04 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 23, 2007, 08:22:04 PM
If Sakurai wanted him in, he wouldn't put him in the background, simple as that.
"They can easily take him out while someone is playing him."
I'm sure Sakurai just wouldn't put him in the background at all if he was gonna fight.
"But there's an Animal Crossing icon, so there's gonna be a Animal crossing Rep."
There's a DS icon too, think, who'd be playable for that?
"They can take him out of the background before the game releases."
I repeat, if Sakurai wanted him playable at all, he wouldn't of put him in the background.
"In SSBM, in Big Blue, you could ride on top of Captain Falcon's car and play with him at the same time"
Maybe someone else is driving it.
"Only Captain Falcon can drive it."
Proof that no one else can? and maybe there's an auto pilot.
"Face it, your arguements have no logic and blah didly blah, I'm right, you're wrong, blah didly blah blah."
K.
Sonic and King Dedede proves that anything is possible! :P
1. Sonic didn't have anything to do with anything I said.
2. King Dedede is in the background in a past stage when he wasn't playable, I beleive not all the stages will be returning.
People thought they had SOLID proof that Sonic or Dedede would NOT be playable in Brawl.
Adn they were wrong. ;)
Just remember, what you may THINK is solid proof, might not be that solid! ;)
If Sakurai wanted him in, he wouldn't put him in the background, simple as that.
"They can easily take him out while someone is playing him."
I'm sure Sakurai just wouldn't put him in the background at all if he was gonna fight.
This is Smash. It's not supposed to make sense. That's why you can fight in a chat program.
"But there's an Animal Crossing icon, so there's gonna be a Animal crossing Rep."
There's a DS icon too, think, who'd be playable for that?
There's no real possible rep for DS.
"They can take him out of the background before the game releases."
I repeat, if Sakurai wanted him playable at all, he wouldn't of put him in the background.
There are several fighting games where there are playable characters in the backgrounds.
"In SSBM, in Big Blue, you could ride on top of Captain Falcon's car and play with him at the same time"
Maybe someone else is driving it.
Who knows? You can't see it.
"Only Captain Falcon can drive it."
Proof that no one else can? and maybe there's an auto pilot.
I agree that argument is flawed.
"Face it, your arguements have no logic and blah didly blah, I'm right, you're wrong, blah didly blah blah."
K.
Everyone has a chance unless Sakurai says so.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 23, 2007, 08:27:58 PM
If Sakurai wanted him in, he wouldn't put him in the background, simple as that.
"They can easily take him out while someone is playing him."
I'm sure Sakurai just wouldn't put him in the background at all if he was gonna fight.
"But there's an Animal Crossing icon, so there's gonna be a Animal crossing Rep."
There's a DS icon too, think, who'd be playable for that?
There's no real rep for the DS
"They can take him out of the background before the game releases."
I repeat, if Sakurai wanted him playable at all, he wouldn't of put him in the background.
There are several fighting games where there are playable characters in the backgrounds.
"In SSBM, in Big Blue, you could ride on top of Captain Falcon's car and play with him at the same time"
Maybe someone else is driving it.
Who knows? You can't see it.
"Only Captain Falcon can drive it."
Proof that no one else can? and maybe there's an auto pilot.
I agree that argument is flawed.
"Face it, your arguements have no logic and blah didly blah, I'm right, you're wrong, blah didly blah blah."
K.
Everyone has a chance unless Sakurai says so.
1. K.
2. Well this is Smash Bros., not the fighting game you're thinking of.
3. IDK if you're agreeing with me or with the fake guy I quoted, so I cannot correctly respond.
4. That's why I said "I beleive Nook isn't playable," I never said he wasn't.
Quote from: JrDude on December 23, 2007, 08:31:51 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 23, 2007, 08:27:58 PM
If Sakurai wanted him in, he wouldn't put him in the background, simple as that.
"They can easily take him out while someone is playing him."
I'm sure Sakurai just wouldn't put him in the background at all if he was gonna fight.
"But there's an Animal Crossing icon, so there's gonna be a Animal crossing Rep."
There's a DS icon too, think, who'd be playable for that?
There's no real rep for the DS
"They can take him out of the background before the game releases."
I repeat, if Sakurai wanted him playable at all, he wouldn't of put him in the background.
There are several fighting games where there are playable characters in the backgrounds.
"In SSBM, in Big Blue, you could ride on top of Captain Falcon's car and play with him at the same time"
Maybe someone else is driving it.
Who knows? You can't see it.
"Only Captain Falcon can drive it."
Proof that no one else can? and maybe there's an auto pilot.
I agree that argument is flawed.
"Face it, your arguements have no logic and blah didly blah, I'm right, you're wrong, blah didly blah blah."
K.
Everyone has a chance unless Sakurai says so.
1. K.
2. Well this is Smash Bros., not the fighting game you're thinking of.
3. IDK if you're agreeing with me or with the fake guy I quoted, so I cannot correctly respond.
4. That's why I said "I beleive Nook isn't playable," I never said he wasn't.
Yet you say everything in a "factual" sort of tone.
Hmm, mixed messages. :-\
Quote from: Shujinco on December 23, 2007, 08:33:26 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 23, 2007, 08:31:51 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 23, 2007, 08:27:58 PM
If Sakurai wanted him in, he wouldn't put him in the background, simple as that.
"They can easily take him out while someone is playing him."
I'm sure Sakurai just wouldn't put him in the background at all if he was gonna fight.
"But there's an Animal Crossing icon, so there's gonna be a Animal crossing Rep."
There's a DS icon too, think, who'd be playable for that?
There's no real rep for the DS
"They can take him out of the background before the game releases."
I repeat, if Sakurai wanted him playable at all, he wouldn't of put him in the background.
There are several fighting games where there are playable characters in the backgrounds.
"In SSBM, in Big Blue, you could ride on top of Captain Falcon's car and play with him at the same time"
Maybe someone else is driving it.
Who knows? You can't see it.
"Only Captain Falcon can drive it."
Proof that no one else can? and maybe there's an auto pilot.
I agree that argument is flawed.
"Face it, your arguements have no logic and blah didly blah, I'm right, you're wrong, blah didly blah blah."
K.
Everyone has a chance unless Sakurai says so.
1. K.
2. Well this is Smash Bros., not the fighting game you're thinking of.
3. IDK if you're agreeing with me or with the fake guy I quoted, so I cannot correctly respond.
4. That's why I said "I beleive Nook isn't playable," I never said he wasn't.
Yet you say everything in a "factual" sort of tone.
Hmm, mixed messages. :-\
and your point is?
Quote from: JrDude on December 23, 2007, 08:34:58 PM
Quote from: Shujinco on December 23, 2007, 08:33:26 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 23, 2007, 08:31:51 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 23, 2007, 08:27:58 PM
If Sakurai wanted him in, he wouldn't put him in the background, simple as that.
"They can easily take him out while someone is playing him."
I'm sure Sakurai just wouldn't put him in the background at all if he was gonna fight.
"But there's an Animal Crossing icon, so there's gonna be a Animal crossing Rep."
There's a DS icon too, think, who'd be playable for that?
There's no real rep for the DS
"They can take him out of the background before the game releases."
I repeat, if Sakurai wanted him playable at all, he wouldn't of put him in the background.
There are several fighting games where there are playable characters in the backgrounds.
"In SSBM, in Big Blue, you could ride on top of Captain Falcon's car and play with him at the same time"
Maybe someone else is driving it.
Who knows? You can't see it.
"Only Captain Falcon can drive it."
Proof that no one else can? and maybe there's an auto pilot.
I agree that argument is flawed.
"Face it, your arguements have no logic and blah didly blah, I'm right, you're wrong, blah didly blah blah."
K.
Everyone has a chance unless Sakurai says so.
1. K.
2. Well this is Smash Bros., not the fighting game you're thinking of.
3. IDK if you're agreeing with me or with the fake guy I quoted, so I cannot correctly respond.
4. That's why I said "I beleive Nook isn't playable," I never said he wasn't.
Yet you say everything in a "factual" sort of tone.
Hmm, mixed messages. :-\
and your point is?
You say things as if they were facts, yet you admit other things could happen.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 23, 2007, 08:37:34 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 23, 2007, 08:34:58 PM
Quote from: Shujinco on December 23, 2007, 08:33:26 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 23, 2007, 08:31:51 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 23, 2007, 08:27:58 PM
If Sakurai wanted him in, he wouldn't put him in the background, simple as that.
"They can easily take him out while someone is playing him."
I'm sure Sakurai just wouldn't put him in the background at all if he was gonna fight.
"But there's an Animal Crossing icon, so there's gonna be a Animal crossing Rep."
There's a DS icon too, think, who'd be playable for that?
There's no real rep for the DS
"They can take him out of the background before the game releases."
I repeat, if Sakurai wanted him playable at all, he wouldn't of put him in the background.
There are several fighting games where there are playable characters in the backgrounds.
"In SSBM, in Big Blue, you could ride on top of Captain Falcon's car and play with him at the same time"
Maybe someone else is driving it.
Who knows? You can't see it.
"Only Captain Falcon can drive it."
Proof that no one else can? and maybe there's an auto pilot.
I agree that argument is flawed.
"Face it, your arguements have no logic and blah didly blah, I'm right, you're wrong, blah didly blah blah."
K.
Everyone has a chance unless Sakurai says so.
1. K.
2. Well this is Smash Bros., not the fighting game you're thinking of.
3. IDK if you're agreeing with me or with the fake guy I quoted, so I cannot correctly respond.
4. That's why I said "I beleive Nook isn't playable," I never said he wasn't.
Yet you say everything in a "factual" sort of tone.
Hmm, mixed messages. :-\
and your point is?
You say things as if they were facts, yet you admit other things could happen.
Pretty much! :)
Quote from: Shujinco on December 23, 2007, 08:39:12 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 23, 2007, 08:37:34 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 23, 2007, 08:34:58 PM
Quote from: Shujinco on December 23, 2007, 08:33:26 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 23, 2007, 08:31:51 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 23, 2007, 08:27:58 PM
If Sakurai wanted him in, he wouldn't put him in the background, simple as that.
"They can easily take him out while someone is playing him."
I'm sure Sakurai just wouldn't put him in the background at all if he was gonna fight.
"But there's an Animal Crossing icon, so there's gonna be a Animal crossing Rep."
There's a DS icon too, think, who'd be playable for that?
There's no real rep for the DS
"They can take him out of the background before the game releases."
I repeat, if Sakurai wanted him playable at all, he wouldn't of put him in the background.
There are several fighting games where there are playable characters in the backgrounds.
"In SSBM, in Big Blue, you could ride on top of Captain Falcon's car and play with him at the same time"
Maybe someone else is driving it.
Who knows? You can't see it.
"Only Captain Falcon can drive it."
Proof that no one else can? and maybe there's an auto pilot.
I agree that argument is flawed.
"Face it, your arguements have no logic and blah didly blah, I'm right, you're wrong, blah didly blah blah."
K.
Everyone has a chance unless Sakurai says so.
1. K.
2. Well this is Smash Bros., not the fighting game you're thinking of.
3. IDK if you're agreeing with me or with the fake guy I quoted, so I cannot correctly respond.
4. That's why I said "I beleive Nook isn't playable," I never said he wasn't.
Yet you say everything in a "factual" sort of tone.
Hmm, mixed messages. :-\
and your point is?
You say things as if they were facts, yet you admit other things could happen.
Pretty much! :)
Your point is?
Yup.
yeah i dont think nook will be in either but i really wish he was
So by your reasoning, Megaman won't be playable because if Sakurai wanted him in he would've asked to put him in in the first place......YES!
What is Tom Nook anyway? Is he a squirrel?
Nobody needs your negativity >:(
He might be in, he might not.
Trying to convince everyone what you think is right isn't going to change anything.
Oh and also... NO WAI NUB UR ST00PID NOOK WIL B IN BRAWL!!!1
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on December 23, 2007, 10:31:02 PM
What is Tom Nook anyway? Is he a squirrel?
he is a tanooki but in the english version they made him a racoon :'(
Quote from: WaterGod on December 23, 2007, 09:53:31 PM
So by your reasoning, Megaman won't be playable because if Sakurai wanted him in he would've asked to put him in in the first place......YES!
wah? that made no sence to what I said, and if you beleive it does, explain better
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 01:37:01 AM
Quote from: WaterGod on December 23, 2007, 09:53:31 PM
So by your reasoning, Megaman won't be playable because if Sakurai wanted him in he would've asked to put him in in the first place......YES!
wah? that made no sence to what I said, and if you beleive it does, explain better
umm sorry anyway what i meant is that you think that if tom nook was meant to be playable he would've made him playable from the start, well if he wanted megaman in then he would've ask for him from the start.
I don't want nook in either btw. :)
Quote from: WaterGod on December 24, 2007, 10:22:24 AM
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 01:37:01 AM
Quote from: WaterGod on December 23, 2007, 09:53:31 PM
So by your reasoning, Megaman won't be playable because if Sakurai wanted him in he would've asked to put him in in the first place......YES!
wah? that made no sence to what I said, and if you beleive it does, explain better
umm sorry anyway what i meant is that you think that if tom nook was meant to be playable he would've made him playable from the start, well if he wanted megaman in then he would've ask for him from the start.
I don't want nook in either btw. :)
Everyone has a chance unless Sakurai says so.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 24, 2007, 10:24:12 AM
Quote from: WaterGod on December 24, 2007, 10:22:24 AM
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 01:37:01 AM
Quote from: WaterGod on December 23, 2007, 09:53:31 PM
So by your reasoning, Megaman won't be playable because if Sakurai wanted him in he would've asked to put him in in the first place......YES!
wah? that made no sence to what I said, and if you beleive it does, explain better
umm sorry anyway what i meant is that you think that if tom nook was meant to be playable he would've made him playable from the start, well if he wanted megaman in then he would've ask for him from the start.
I don't want nook in either btw. :)
Everyone has a chance unless Sakurai says so.
I'd rather have an animal crosser over nook though :-\
Quote from: WaterGod on December 24, 2007, 10:26:39 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 24, 2007, 10:24:12 AM
Quote from: WaterGod on December 24, 2007, 10:22:24 AM
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 01:37:01 AM
Quote from: WaterGod on December 23, 2007, 09:53:31 PM
So by your reasoning, Megaman won't be playable because if Sakurai wanted him in he would've asked to put him in in the first place......YES!
wah? that made no sence to what I said, and if you beleive it does, explain better
umm sorry anyway what i meant is that you think that if tom nook was meant to be playable he would've made him playable from the start, well if he wanted megaman in then he would've ask for him from the start.
I don't want nook in either btw. :)
Everyone has a chance unless Sakurai says so.
I'd rather have an animal crosser over nook though :-\
Me too.
Quote from: WaterGod on December 24, 2007, 10:22:24 AM
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 01:37:01 AM
Quote from: WaterGod on December 23, 2007, 09:53:31 PM
So by your reasoning, Megaman won't be playable because if Sakurai wanted him in he would've asked to put him in in the first place......YES!
wah? that made no sence to what I said, and if you beleive it does, explain better
umm sorry anyway what i meant is that you think that if tom nook was meant to be playable he would've made him playable from the start, well if he wanted megaman in then he would've ask for him from the start.
I don't want nook in either btw. :)
you just said the same thing... I still don't understand...
I 100% agree with you!
Quote from: thunderhero4 on December 24, 2007, 01:54:43 PM
I 100% agree with you!
Being in the background lowers his chances, but doesn't take them away.
Animal Crosser has a better chance, though.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 24, 2007, 01:56:56 PM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on December 24, 2007, 01:54:43 PM
I 100% agree with you!
Being in the background lowers his chances, but doesn't take them away.
Animal Crosser has a better chance, though.
yah...i would rather have a mii than him/her though...
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 24, 2007, 01:56:56 PM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on December 24, 2007, 01:54:43 PM
I 100% agree with you!
Being in the background lowers his chances, but doesn't take them away.
Animal Crosser has a better chance, though.
yeah but there are animal crossers in the background too.
Quote from: thunderhero4 on December 24, 2007, 01:59:09 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 24, 2007, 01:56:56 PM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on December 24, 2007, 01:54:43 PM
I 100% agree with you!
Being in the background lowers his chances, but doesn't take them away.
Animal Crosser has a better chance, though.
yah...i would rather have a mii than him/her though...
Why can't there be both? :-\
Animal Crossing deserves a rep.
Quote from: Apollo on December 24, 2007, 02:00:50 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 24, 2007, 01:56:56 PM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on December 24, 2007, 01:54:43 PM
I 100% agree with you!
Being in the background lowers his chances, but doesn't take them away.
Animal Crosser has a better chance, though.
yeah but there are animal crossers in the background too.
There are lots of different styles of Crossers.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 24, 2007, 02:01:48 PM
Quote from: Apollo on December 24, 2007, 02:00:50 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 24, 2007, 01:56:56 PM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on December 24, 2007, 01:54:43 PM
I 100% agree with you!
Being in the background lowers his chances, but doesn't take them away.
Animal Crosser has a better chance, though.
yeah but there are animal crossers in the background too.
There are lots of different styles of Crossers.
do you think it would be possible to customize your animal crosser if it is playable
Quote from: Apollo on December 24, 2007, 02:11:13 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 24, 2007, 02:01:48 PM
Quote from: Apollo on December 24, 2007, 02:00:50 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on December 24, 2007, 01:56:56 PM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on December 24, 2007, 01:54:43 PM
I 100% agree with you!
Being in the background lowers his chances, but doesn't take them away.
Animal Crosser has a better chance, though.
yeah but there are animal crossers in the background too.
There are lots of different styles of Crossers.
do you think it would be possible to customize your animal crosser if it is playable
Maybe. You could pull out Animal Crossing DS say your visiting somewhere and then go into Brawl and you could make that the look of the crosser. Or you could just put a GC memory card in and take a crosser from that.
People, remember; the rant in the first post is coming from a guy who can't spell the word "believe" right. :| Anyway, I see no solid proof yet that Nook is or isn't playable in Brawl.
Of coarse Tom Nook isn't playable. Animal Crosser is.
Well if the game comes out in febuary then they can't release a ton of new characters unless the team works really hard
Quote from: Mutilator7 on December 24, 2007, 02:46:15 PM
Well if the game comes out in febuary then they can't release a ton of new characters unless the team works really hard
The characters could already be in the game; they just haven't been announced yet.
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 02:32:26 PM
People, remember; the rant in the first post is coming from a guy who can't spell the word "believe" right. :| Anyway, I see no solid proof yet that Nook is or isn't playable in Brawl.
it's called a common mistake from typing too fast Mr. "I must flame thread creator since he sucks an I'm the best."
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 04:35:34 PM
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 02:32:26 PM
People, remember; the rant in the first post is coming from a guy who can't spell the word "believe" right. :| Anyway, I see no solid proof yet that Nook is or isn't playable in Brawl.
it's called a common mistake from typing too fast Mr. "I must flame thread creator since he sucks an I'm the best."
When did I ever say I was the best? I was just pointing out a mistake you made. I wasn't serious at all in that first part. The second sentence, however, was in all seriousness.
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 04:39:07 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 04:35:34 PM
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 02:32:26 PM
People, remember; the rant in the first post is coming from a guy who can't spell the word "believe" right. :| Anyway, I see no solid proof yet that Nook is or isn't playable in Brawl.
it's called a common mistake from typing too fast Mr. "I must flame thread creator since he sucks an I'm the best."
When did I ever say I was the best? I was just pointing out a mistake you made. I wasn't serious at all in that first part. The second sentence, however, was in all seriousness.
Mhmm
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 04:41:34 PM
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 04:39:07 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 04:35:34 PM
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 02:32:26 PM
People, remember; the rant in the first post is coming from a guy who can't spell the word "believe" right. :| Anyway, I see no solid proof yet that Nook is or isn't playable in Brawl.
it's called a common mistake from typing too fast Mr. "I must flame thread creator since he sucks an I'm the best."
When did I ever say I was the best? I was just pointing out a mistake you made. I wasn't serious at all in that first part. The second sentence, however, was in all seriousness.
Mhmm
Mhmm you are good at using that "What you say can and will be used against you" thing
Quote from: Ridley on December 24, 2007, 07:48:32 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 04:41:34 PM
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 04:39:07 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 04:35:34 PM
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 02:32:26 PM
People, remember; the rant in the first post is coming from a guy who can't spell the word "believe" right. :| Anyway, I see no solid proof yet that Nook is or isn't playable in Brawl.
it's called a common mistake from typing too fast Mr. "I must flame thread creator since he sucks an I'm the best."
When did I ever say I was the best? I was just pointing out a mistake you made. I wasn't serious at all in that first part. The second sentence, however, was in all seriousness.
Mhmm
Mhmm you are good at using that "What you say can and will be used against you" thing
I don't get it! All he did was bold a part of my sentence and say "mhmm".
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 07:49:59 PM
Quote from: Ridley on December 24, 2007, 07:48:32 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 04:41:34 PM
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 04:39:07 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 04:35:34 PM
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 02:32:26 PM
People, remember; the rant in the first post is coming from a guy who can't spell the word "believe" right. :| Anyway, I see no solid proof yet that Nook is or isn't playable in Brawl.
it's called a common mistake from typing too fast Mr. "I must flame thread creator since he sucks an I'm the best."
When did I ever say I was the best? I was just pointing out a mistake you made. I wasn't serious at all in that first part. The second sentence, however, was in all seriousness.
Mhmm
Mhmm you are good at using that "What you say can and will be used against you" thing
I don't get it! All he did was bold a part of my sentence and say "mhmm".
Thats the point!
Quote from: Ridley on December 24, 2007, 07:52:05 PM
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 07:49:59 PM
Quote from: Ridley on December 24, 2007, 07:48:32 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 04:41:34 PM
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 04:39:07 PM
Quote from: JrDude on December 24, 2007, 04:35:34 PM
Quote from: LightningSword on December 24, 2007, 02:32:26 PM
People, remember; the rant in the first post is coming from a guy who can't spell the word "believe" right. :| Anyway, I see no solid proof yet that Nook is or isn't playable in Brawl.
it's called a common mistake from typing too fast Mr. "I must flame thread creator since he sucks an I'm the best."
When did I ever say I was the best? I was just pointing out a mistake you made. I wasn't serious at all in that first part. The second sentence, however, was in all seriousness.
Mhmm
Mhmm you are good at using that "What you say can and will be used against you" thing
I don't get it! All he did was bold a part of my sentence and say "mhmm".
Thats the point!
:D
Well, my opinion is....
I have no opinion.
If Sakurai wants him playable, fine, but if not, fine too X_X;
Quote from: Nayrman on December 24, 2007, 09:08:02 PM
Well, my opinion is....
I have no opinion.
If Sakurai wants him playable, fine, but if not, fine too X_X;
yah, i dont really care either...
Quote from: thunderhero4 on December 24, 2007, 09:12:04 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on December 24, 2007, 09:08:02 PM
Well, my opinion is....
I have no opinion.
If Sakurai wants him playable, fine, but if not, fine too X_X;
yah, i dont really care either...
As long as Classic Mario is in. :D