If you're not quoting anyone, we will just assume you're talking to the thread creator.
JJUST SO U NO.
Quote from: Spiderham on September 26, 2007, 05:55:06 PM
If you're not quoting anyone, we will just assume you're talking to the thread creator.
JJUST SO U NO.
You know, you're right. Quoting the OP is pretty annoying at times. I wish only pain for those who do it.
(lol?)
Quote from: X-3 on September 26, 2007, 05:57:18 PM
Quote from: Spiderham on September 26, 2007, 05:55:06 PM
If you're not quoting anyone, we will just assume you're talking to the thread creator.
JJUST SO U NO.
You know, you're right. Quoting the OP is pretty annoying at times. I wish only pain for those who do it.
(lol?)
I knew someone would do this...
Quote from: Spiderham on September 26, 2007, 05:55:06 PM
If you're not quoting anyone, we will just assume you're talking to the thread creator.
JJUST SO U NO.
Some threads get extremely off-topic, and there ends up being two different discussions in the same thread.
Also, quoted for the irony.
Quote from: Spiderham on September 26, 2007, 05:55:06 PM
If you're not quoting anyone, we will just assume you're talking to the thread creator.
JJUST SO U NO.
I'm not quoting you *shifts his eyes*
When there are no replies in the thread, quoting the original post is pretty much useless. But when there's more than a page in a thread, I usually quote the first post when I mean to reply to that one alone. It's easier to spot when you're looking for something specific.
Better question:
Why not?
Even if it's clearly directed at someone else's post? I think not. :P
Quote from: Spiderham on September 26, 2007, 05:55:06 PM
If you're not quoting anyone, we will just assume you're talking to the thread creator.
JJUST SO U NO.
So I should join the cercuis act now should I?