Halo 2 in 2004:
http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w198/kingoftherings/games/halo2.jpg (http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w198/kingoftherings/games/halo2.jpg)
Halo 3 in 2007:
http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w198/kingoftherings/games/halo3.jpg (http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w198/kingoftherings/games/halo3.jpg)
Far Cry in 2004:
http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w198/kingoftherings/games/farcry1.jpg (http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w198/kingoftherings/games/farcry1.jpg)
Crysis in 2007:
http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w198/kingoftherings/games/crysis.jpg (http://i176.photobucket.com/albums/w198/kingoftherings/games/crysis.jpg)
Why is the difference between Far Cry and Crysis much greater than Halo 2 and 3 in the same span of time? I think Far Cry looks even better than Halo 3. O_o
Bungie needs to stop pumping out crap, and make something decent. What have they done the last three years?
Make a game that won't be any better than a root canal?
worst is at top, best at bottom.
Crysis is so much better b/c it is on a pc.
Quote from: SSANDROID on September 26, 2007, 08:10:25 PM
worst is at top, best at bottom.
Crysis is so much better b/c it is on a pc.
But there should still be a difference between Halo 2 and 3...
Farcry and halo 2 are about the same. (By the looks of those pictures)
And stop using picture of Crysis concept art. >_>
Concept art =/= In-game.
Quote from: Kingoftherings on September 26, 2007, 08:14:00 PM
Quote from: SSANDROID on September 26, 2007, 08:10:25 PM
worst is at top, best at bottom.
Crysis is so much better b/c it is on a pc.
But there should still be a difference between Halo 2 and 3...
Look at my signature, thats an in-game screenshot of Halo 3.
You can accually see reflections in the visor.