Why is everyone a against Pacman?
He is one of the most well know Video Game characters in the WORLD.
He would be the first Namco rep that deserves to be in.
He has a unique moveset.
And don't just say because he sucks. :|
Well, I don't have a problem with him.
I don't really care if he's in or not....
is neutral
The more the merrier.
I don't really care....
Really. I mean, I wouldn't mind if he was in....
i personally am against him getiing in.
i know hes famous but id rather have a Nintendo character in then him.
i have nothing against theclassic pacman, but what tey did to him in pacman world and whatnot is unforgivale
pacman should not go into 3d
Because Namco doesn't deserve a rep and Pac Man isn't great anymore.
I mean.... look at him!!!
(http://weblogs.newsday.com/sports/watchdog/blog/pacman.gif)
Quote from: Cornwad on January 19, 2008, 06:19:42 AM
Because Namco doesn't deserve a rep and Pac Man isn't great anymore.
I mean.... look at him!!!
(http://weblogs.newsday.com/sports/watchdog/blog/pacman.gif)
EXACTLY
look at that!
its horrible!
stay in 2d!
Quote from: Apollo on January 19, 2008, 06:14:28 AM
i personally am against him getiing in.
i know hes famous but id rather have a Nintendo character in then him.
me too
New Pacman sucks (which most people here would agree on) and old Pacman han no legs or arms or weapons or ANYTHING, so he really wouldn't fit in. I mean, can you pro-pacman people explain how he'd be playable if he got in?
Besides, Square Enix or Capcom deserve to have a rep way more than Namco, and I think Sora (from the very popular Kingdom Hearts series) deserves to be Square's rep. There are only two things in his way:
1. KH is half owned by Disney, but since Sora isn't actually a disney character, he should be fine.
2. Capcom has that gay blue guy with the arm cannon.
Quote from: Smash Bro 25 on January 19, 2008, 08:55:41 AM
New Pacman sucks (which most people here would agree on) and old Pacman han no legs or arms or weapons or ANYTHING, so he really wouldn't fit in. I mean, can you pro-pacman people explain how he'd be playable if he got in?
Besides, Square Enix or Capcom deserve to have a rep way more than Namco, and I think Sora (from the very popular Kingdom Hearts series) deserves to be Square's rep. There are only two things in his way:
1. KH the guy with the key.
2. Capcom has Megaman
Fixed.
Quote from: RedSox on January 19, 2008, 09:09:54 AM
Quote from: Smash Bro 25 on January 19, 2008, 08:55:41 AM
New Pacman sucks (which most people here would agree on) and old Pacman han no legs or arms or weapons or ANYTHING, so he really wouldn't fit in. I mean, can you pro-pacman people explain how he'd be playable if he got in?
Besides, Square Enix or Capcom deserve to have a rep way more than Namco, and I think Sora (from the very popular Kingdom Hearts series) deserves to be Square's rep. There are only two things in his way:
1. KH the guy with the key.
2. Capcom has Megaman
Fixed.
Sora is the guy with the key. he can't get in his own way.
I have no problem with Pacman in brawl. He's classic and will attract more of the old-school gamers
Quote from: Smash Bro 25 on January 19, 2008, 09:13:44 AM
Quote from: RedSox on January 19, 2008, 09:09:54 AM
Quote from: Smash Bro 25 on January 19, 2008, 08:55:41 AM
New Pacman sucks (which most people here would agree on) and old Pacman han no legs or arms or weapons or ANYTHING, so he really wouldn't fit in. I mean, can you pro-pacman people explain how he'd be playable if he got in?
Besides, Square Enix or Capcom deserve to have a rep way more than Namco, and I think Sora (from the very popular Kingdom Hearts series) deserves to be Square's rep. There are only two things in his way:
1. KH has the guy with the key.
2. Capcom has Megaman
Fixed.
Sora is the guy with the key. he can't get in his own way.
Megaman deserves it a whole lot more.
Quote from: Smash Bro 25 on January 19, 2008, 08:55:41 AM
New Pacman sucks (which most people here would agree on) and old Pacman han no legs or arms or weapons or ANYTHING, so he really wouldn't fit in. I mean, can you pro-pacman people explain how he'd be playable if he got in?
Besides, Square Enix or Capcom deserve to have a rep way more than Namco, and I think Sora (from the very popular Kingdom Hearts series) deserves to be Square's rep. There are only two things in his way:
1. KH is half owned by Disney, but since Sora isn't actually a disney character, he should be fine.
2. Capcom has that gay blue guy with the arm cannon.
Geno would make more sense.
you kidding me? Pac Man is like the very first video game character ever!! And he made it all the way to this date... he deserves to be in ssbb! And if youve ever played Pacman lost in time (I think thats what it was called) that game was awesome! It was pacman but with awesome new 3-D.
I have nothing against Pac-Man. I just want Bomberman and Megaman a lot more (Bomberman being my most wanted third party besides a certain blue dude who's already in)
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 09:48:15 AM
I have nothing against Pac-Man. I just want Bomberman and Megaman a lot more (Bomberman being my most wanted third party besides a certain blue dude who's already in)
Of course that blue dude was on the top of my list ::)
and I want Bomberman and Pacman the same...but never Megaman
Quote from: thunderhero4 on January 19, 2008, 09:51:36 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 09:48:15 AM
I have nothing against Pac-Man. I just want Bomberman and Megaman a lot more (Bomberman being my most wanted third party besides a certain blue dude who's already in)
Of course that blue dude was on the top of my list ::)
and I want Bomberman and Pacman the same...but never Megaman
Why? The big three in the NES era were Mario, Zelda, and Megaman. Those were pretty much teh only game to play back then X_X;;
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 09:53:41 AM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on January 19, 2008, 09:51:36 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 09:48:15 AM
I have nothing against Pac-Man. I just want Bomberman and Megaman a lot more (Bomberman being my most wanted third party besides a certain blue dude who's already in)
Of course that blue dude was on the top of my list ::)
and I want Bomberman and Pacman the same...but never Megaman
Why? The big three in the NES era were Mario, Zelda, and Megaman. Those were pretty much teh only game to play back then X_X;;
the big one to play in the atari era was Pacman... :P
Quote from: thunderhero4 on January 19, 2008, 09:56:04 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 09:53:41 AM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on January 19, 2008, 09:51:36 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 09:48:15 AM
I have nothing against Pac-Man. I just want Bomberman and Megaman a lot more (Bomberman being my most wanted third party besides a certain blue dude who's already in)
Of course that blue dude was on the top of my list ::)
and I want Bomberman and Pacman the same...but never Megaman
Why? The big three in the NES era were Mario, Zelda, and Megaman. Those were pretty much teh only game to play back then X_X;;
the big one to play in the atari era was Pacman... :P
Actually, the Atari version of Pac-Man was a cheap knock off not even licensed by Namco...
The "true" pacman was Arcade only, along with the Ms.Pacman/Galaga set (best arcade machine EVEER!)
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 09:57:52 AM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on January 19, 2008, 09:56:04 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 09:53:41 AM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on January 19, 2008, 09:51:36 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 09:48:15 AM
I have nothing against Pac-Man. I just want Bomberman and Megaman a lot more (Bomberman being my most wanted third party besides a certain blue dude who's already in)
Of course that blue dude was on the top of my list ::)
and I want Bomberman and Pacman the same...but never Megaman
Why? The big three in the NES era were Mario, Zelda, and Megaman. Those were pretty much teh only game to play back then X_X;;
the big one to play in the atari era was Pacman... :P
Actually, the Atari version of Pac-Man was a cheap knock off not even licensed by Namco...
The "true" pacman was Arcade only, along with the Ms.Pacman/Galaga set (best arcade machine EVEER!)
thats what I meant :)
And I agree, with the F-Zero AX arcade system right behind it!
I don't care if he's in as long as either Bomberman or a FF rep makes it in first and that gawd awful megaman stays out of my smash bros.!!! >:(
I either want Pac-Man or Bomberman.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on January 19, 2008, 10:24:21 AM
I either want Pac-Man or Bomberman.
Same here...
but to tell you the truth, my absolute most wanted 3rd part rep (Besides Sonic and Vector) is Banjo and Kazooie...that would be sweet!
Quote from: thunderhero4 on January 19, 2008, 10:26:50 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on January 19, 2008, 10:24:21 AM
I either want Pac-Man or Bomberman.
Same here...
but to tell you the truth, my absolute most wanted 3rd part rep (Besides Sonic and Vector) is Banjo and Kazooie...that would be sweet!
They would be fun to play as ::)
Quote from: WaterGod on January 19, 2008, 10:29:14 AM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on January 19, 2008, 10:26:50 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on January 19, 2008, 10:24:21 AM
I either want Pac-Man or Bomberman.
Same here...
but to tell you the truth, my absolute most wanted 3rd part rep (Besides Sonic and Vector) is Banjo and Kazooie...that would be sweet!
They would be fun to play as ::)
ya!
good gawd not taht dumb bear and bird. They're owned by Microsoft, so no way it's going to happen. SOrry, but it's not.
Also, don't be surprised if Megaman does get in over Pac-Man...since megaman is more popular than Pacman is and actually still has games worth playing.
I think it's a footrace between Mega and Bomber....with hopefully Bomber winning. I wanna blow stuff up so badly!
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 09:57:52 AM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on January 19, 2008, 09:56:04 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 09:53:41 AM
Quote from: thunderhero4 on January 19, 2008, 09:51:36 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 09:48:15 AM
I have nothing against Pac-Man. I just want Bomberman and Megaman a lot more (Bomberman being my most wanted third party besides a certain blue dude who's already in)
Of course that blue dude was on the top of my list ::)
and I want Bomberman and Pacman the same...but never Megaman
Why? The big three in the NES era were Mario, Zelda, and Megaman. Those were pretty much teh only game to play back then X_X;;
the big one to play in the atari era was Pacman... :P
Actually, the Atari version of Pac-Man was a cheap knock off not even licensed by Namco...
The "true" pacman was Arcade only, along with the Ms.Pacman/Galaga set (best arcade machine EVEER!)
either way it did revolutionize gaming
but hes still not nintendo so i dont support him
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 10:31:00 AM
good gawd not taht dumb bear and bird. They're owned by Microsoft, so no way it's going to happen. SOrry, but it's not.
Also, don't be surprised if Megaman does get in over Pac-Man...since megaman is more popular than Pacman is and actually still has games worth playing.
I think it's a footrace between Mega and Bomber....with hopefully Bomber winning. I wanna blow stuff up so badly!
1. Banjo & Kazooie are awesome, and it is POSSIBLE for Microsoft to let Nintendo borrow them. I mean, it wouldn't be the first time: the two BK games on GBA were made AFTER Microsoft bought rare, so once again, it is POSSIBLE.
2. Even though Megaman and Bomberman are old, that doesn't necisarily make them important--I think Square deserves a rep more than Hudson or Capcom. After all, Square has helped with many Nintendo games, including Super Mario RPG and Mario Hoops 3-on-3. And, they actually did get some of their own characters in Mario Hoops.
3. Out of Mega or Bomber, I'd prefer Bomber--Megaman sux.
Quote from: Smash Bro 25 on January 19, 2008, 11:14:09 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 10:31:00 AM
good gawd not taht dumb bear and bird. They're owned by Microsoft, so no way it's going to happen. SOrry, but it's not.
Also, don't be surprised if Megaman does get in over Pac-Man...since megaman is more popular than Pacman is and actually still has games worth playing.
I think it's a footrace between Mega and Bomber....with hopefully Bomber winning. I wanna blow stuff up so badly!
1. Banjo & Kazooie are awesome, and it is POSSIBLE for Microsoft to let Nintendo borrow them. I mean, it wouldn't be the first time: the two BK games on GBA were made AFTER Microsoft bought rare, so once again, it is POSSIBLE.
2. Even though Megaman and Bomberman are old, that doesn't necisarily make them important--I think Square deserves a rep more than Hudson or Capcom. After all, Square has helped with many Nintendo games, including Super Mario RPG and Mario Hoops 3-on-3. And, they actually did get some of their own characters in Mario Hoops.
3. Out of Mega or Bomber, I'd prefer Bomber--Megaman sux.
ONly reason they let BJ on the DS was because Microsoft doesn't have it's own handheld, and theyd rather help Nintendo than Sony, since Sony is closer on the online market than Nintendo is
I sitll think Bomberman is most deserving, I mean, other than Mario Hoops (which was very "MEH" IMO), what has Square done other than rehash old FF games onto the handheld? Not much I'm afriad...but Geno should still get in
Ok that's IT! I'm going to create the ultimate character poll right now!
The only characters competing for the last 3rd party spot are Pacman, Megaman, and either Black Mage or Chocobo. Banjo, Bomberman, and whatever other other character you might want (Whether it be Viewtiful Joe, Sora, or Mr. Try-to-be-cool Sonic character, aka Shadow) aren't even in the race, and I can't tell you how many times people have mistaken those characters for ones that have good chances. Banjo, Bomberman, and others might have had better chances, but there is only one more spot for 3rd parties at most. Pacman, Megaman, and FF Rep have good reasons for being in over the rest, and I'll tell you why.
Pacman:
If any Namco character is going to be in, Pacman is the one. And let me tell you, Namco and Nintendo aren't unfamiliar with sharing characters.
Megaman:
He's still pretty popular, unlike Pacman. He's also more of the fighting type. But Capcom isn't as close with Nintendo as Namco and Sega, plus recent rumors say that he's confirmed not to be in.
FF Rep:
Although Square isn't in the Triforce Board, they're still buddies with Nintendo. I'm not doubting that Black Mage might make a second appearance in a Nintendo game.
Quote from: LuigiMan on January 19, 2008, 02:21:53 PM
The only characters competing for the last 3rd party spot are Pacman, Megaman, and either Black Mage or Chocobo. Banjo, Bomberman, and whatever other other character you might want (Whether it be Viewtiful Joe, Sora, or Mr. Try-to-be-cool Sonic character, aka Shadow) aren't even in the race, and I can't tell you how many times people have mistaken those characters for ones that have good chances. Banjo, Bomberman, and others might have had better chances, but there is only one more spot for 3rd parties at most. Pacman, Megaman, and FF Rep have good reasons for being in over the rest, and I'll tell you why.
Pacman:
If any Namco character is going to be in, Pacman is the one. And let me tell you, Namco and Nintendo aren't unfamiliar with sharing characters.
Megaman:
He's still pretty popular, unlike Pacman. He's also more of the fighting type. But Capcom isn't as close with Nintendo as Namco and Sega, plus recent rumors say that he's confirmed not to be in.
FF Rep:
Although Square isn't in the Triforce Board, they're still buddies with Nintendo. I'm not doubting that Black Mage might make a second appearance in a Nintendo game.
You forgot Bomberman, and Geno would make the most sense as a FF rep.
WHERE THE HECK IS MR. NAMCO IN THIS DISSCUSSION?
You all are Mr. Namco haters! >:(
Quote from: LuigiMan on January 19, 2008, 02:21:53 PM
The only characters competing for the last 3rd party spot are Pacman, Megaman, and either Black Mage or Chocobo. Banjo, Bomberman, and whatever other other character you might want (Whether it be Viewtiful Joe, Sora, or Mr. Try-to-be-cool Sonic character, aka Shadow) aren't even in the race, and I can't tell you how many times people have mistaken those characters for ones that have good chances. Banjo, Bomberman, and others might have had better chances, but there is only one more spot for 3rd parties at most. Pacman, Megaman, and FF Rep have good reasons for being in over the rest, and I'll tell you why.
Pacman:
If any Namco character is going to be in, Pacman is the one. And let me tell you, Namco and Nintendo aren't unfamiliar with sharing characters.
Megaman:
He's still pretty popular, unlike Pacman. He's also more of the fighting type. But Capcom isn't as close with Nintendo as Namco and Sega, plus recent rumors say that he's confirmed not to be in.
FF Rep:
Although Square isn't in the Triforce Board, they're still buddies with Nintendo. I'm not doubting that Black Mage might make a second appearance in a Nintendo game.
You're forgetting that Hudson has practically been a second party to Nintendo, usually giving quality effort to Nintendo's systems. They've made every singe Mario Party (so it wasn't even Ninteno's idea in a way, the credit shoud go to Hudson for one of the biggest cash cows in gaming), and Bomberman has already been in a crossover with Wario on Gameboy, so the two companies have collaborated before when moving two characters into the same screen. If anything chances wise it should be a race between Megaman and Bomberman. Namco and Square have other representatives they oculd use as well. After all, Nintendo did let Namco use Link in Soul Calibur, who's to say they won't use someone like Misturugi or something?
If Namco was going to put a character in SSBB, I'd honestly rather see Klonoa than Pac-Man.
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 02:40:16 PM
Quote from: LuigiMan on January 19, 2008, 02:21:53 PM
The only characters competing for the last 3rd party spot are Pacman, Megaman, and either Black Mage or Chocobo. Banjo, Bomberman, and whatever other other character you might want (Whether it be Viewtiful Joe, Sora, or Mr. Try-to-be-cool Sonic character, aka Shadow) aren't even in the race, and I can't tell you how many times people have mistaken those characters for ones that have good chances. Banjo, Bomberman, and others might have had better chances, but there is only one more spot for 3rd parties at most. Pacman, Megaman, and FF Rep have good reasons for being in over the rest, and I'll tell you why.
Pacman:
If any Namco character is going to be in, Pacman is the one. And let me tell you, Namco and Nintendo aren't unfamiliar with sharing characters.
Megaman:
He's still pretty popular, unlike Pacman. He's also more of the fighting type. But Capcom isn't as close with Nintendo as Namco and Sega, plus recent rumors say that he's confirmed not to be in.
FF Rep:
Although Square isn't in the Triforce Board, they're still buddies with Nintendo. I'm not doubting that Black Mage might make a second appearance in a Nintendo game.
You're forgetting that Hudson has practically been a second party to Nintendo, usually giving quality effort to Nintendo's systems. They've made every singe Mario Party (so it wasn't even Ninteno's idea in a way, the credit shoud go to Hudson for one of the biggest cash cows in gaming), and Bomberman has already been in a crossover with Wario on Gameboy, so the two companies have collaborated before when moving two characters into the same screen. If anything chances wise it should be a race between Megaman and Bomberman. Namco and Square have other representatives they oculd use as well. After all, Nintendo did let Namco use Link in Soul Calibur, who's to say they won't use someone like Misturugi or something?
MISTURUGI IS THE PWNZORZ!
What are you guys talking about "Megaman should be in before him"
Who ever said that we only have 1 character spot left?
Quote from: GrimTuesday on January 19, 2008, 03:32:41 PM
What are you guys talking about "Megaman should be in before him"
Who ever said that we only have 1 character spot left?
Sakurai said he'd probably only let in around 2-3 tops...so Snake, Sonic, and at most one more.
Of course we don't know exactly, but I'm taking Sakurai's word on this until it gets released.
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 03:42:47 PM
Quote from: GrimTuesday on January 19, 2008, 03:32:41 PM
What are you guys talking about "Megaman should be in before him"
Who ever said that we only have 1 character spot left?
Sakurai said he'd probably only let in around 2-3 tops...so Snake, Sonic, and at most one more.
Of course we don't know exactly, but I'm taking Sakurai's word on this until it gets released.
Yeah, about 2 months after what he told us ORIGINALLY!
He is a man with many interchangable minds!
Quote from: Shujinco on January 19, 2008, 03:44:21 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 19, 2008, 03:42:47 PM
Quote from: GrimTuesday on January 19, 2008, 03:32:41 PM
What are you guys talking about "Megaman should be in before him"
Who ever said that we only have 1 character spot left?
Sakurai said he'd probably only let in around 2-3 tops...so Snake, Sonic, and at most one more.
Of course we don't know exactly, but I'm taking Sakurai's word on this until it gets released.
Yeah, about 2 months after what he told us ORIGINALLY!
He is a man with many interchangable minds!
He's not the dude from Killer 7 here X_X;;
Bomberman/Hudson is easily the most deserving... Hudson works on like every single Mario Spinoff from Mario Party to the countless Mario sports games... Plus, since when has Bomberman NOT been on a Nintendo console?
Quote from: Cornwad on January 19, 2008, 02:24:22 PM
Quote from: LuigiMan on January 19, 2008, 02:21:53 PM
The only characters competing for the last 3rd party spot are Pacman, Megaman, and either Black Mage or Chocobo. Banjo, Bomberman, and whatever other other character you might want (Whether it be Viewtiful Joe, Sora, or Mr. Try-to-be-cool Sonic character, aka Shadow) aren't even in the race, and I can't tell you how many times people have mistaken those characters for ones that have good chances. Banjo, Bomberman, and others might have had better chances, but there is only one more spot for 3rd parties at most. Pacman, Megaman, and FF Rep have good reasons for being in over the rest, and I'll tell you why.
Pacman:
If any Namco character is going to be in, Pacman is the one. And let me tell you, Namco and Nintendo aren't unfamiliar with sharing characters.
Megaman:
He's still pretty popular, unlike Pacman. He's also more of the fighting type. But Capcom isn't as close with Nintendo as Namco and Sega, plus recent rumors say that he's confirmed not to be in.
FF Rep:
Although Square isn't in the Triforce Board, they're still buddies with Nintendo. I'm not doubting that Black Mage might make a second appearance in a Nintendo game.
You forgot Bomberman, and Geno would make the most sense as a FF rep.
Like I said, Bomberman is held back because there are too many better choices. And Geno wouldn't be a FF Rep, he would be a Square rep. Besides, Sakurai considers Geno 1st party anyway.
I dont! I like Pacman.