Poll
Question:
Obama or McKain?
Option 1: Barack Obama
votes: 9
Option 2: John Mccain
votes: 5
Option 3: Bring back Hilary
votes: 1
Option 4: Bring back [Other]
votes: 3
So, Omama or McLame? Or would you rather Clinton came back (yes, I thought up a name for her as well. I think I'd be offended too many people if I used it, though.)? Honestly, I've been waiting for Barack Obama to beat out Hilary for a long time. I'm glad he finally has, and I'm just waiting for him to outrun the old guy and win presidency.
...If he's not assassinated first >_>...
And you can just ignore the play on their last names... I got bored, and just felt like doing it. It doesn't mean I hate either one or the other. I'm pretty indifferent on all the other candidates besides Barack, who I want to win. Deal with it.
In before Ron Paul.
Also, Barack would have the secret service protect him 24/7 if he was elected.
After Hilary conceited, some people said they wouldn't vote for anyone.
Expect McCain to be our next president, serve two terms, and then die a year later.
Bring back Huckabee. D:
Which one seems less corrupt?
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Well, McCain hasn't had one earmark in twenty years of being a politician.
Which means he hasn't attached something frivolous to an existing bill to pass it.
But of course, he sees the war going on for a while.
Edit: Damn, I brought the McCain ads to this thread. >_>
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 11:48:32 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Well, McCain hasn't had one earmark in twenty years of being a politician.
Which means he hasn't attached something frivolous to an existing bill to pass it.
But of course, he sees the war going on for a while.
Edit: Damn, I brought the McCain ads to this thread. >_>
lol
I don't really pay attention to politics. I don't give a crap about government, all I can really say is that 99.99% of them are corrupt bastards.
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Obama wants to raise taxes and wants to spend an additional 1 trillion dollars on mostly useless stuff.
He also wants to tax oil companies even though the government gets 15% of profits from gas, and the oil companies only get 4%.
He's also a n_gger. :B
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:51:56 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 11:48:32 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Well, McCain hasn't had one earmark in twenty years of being a politician.
Which means he hasn't attached something frivolous to an existing bill to pass it.
But of course, he sees the war going on for a while.
Edit: Damn, I brought the McCain ads to this thread. >_>
lol
I don't really pay attention to politics. I don't give a crap about government, all I can really say is that 99.99% of them are corrupt bastards.
You really should start caring.
One of those men will become President of America.
they are both awful, but if I have to chose I pick Obama, at least he's better then romney
Quote from: Totla on June 11, 2008, 11:54:48 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Obama wants to raise taxes and wants to spend an additional 1 trillion dollars on mostly useless stuff.
He also wants to tax oil companies even though the government gets 15% of profits from gas, and the oil companies only get 4%.
He's also a n_gger. :B
Don't tell me you wouldn't vote for him because he's black.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 11:57:32 AM
Quote from: Totla on June 11, 2008, 11:54:48 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Obama wants to raise taxes and wants to spend an additional 1 trillion dollars on mostly useless stuff.
He also wants to tax oil companies even though the government gets 15% of profits from gas, and the oil companies only get 4%.
He's also a n_gger. :B
Don't tell me you wouldn't vote for him because he's black.
It was a joke.
Quote from: Totla on June 11, 2008, 11:58:27 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 11:57:32 AM
Quote from: Totla on June 11, 2008, 11:54:48 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Obama wants to raise taxes and wants to spend an additional 1 trillion dollars on mostly useless stuff.
He also wants to tax oil companies even though the government gets 15% of profits from gas, and the oil companies only get 4%.
He's also a n_gger. :B
Don't tell me you wouldn't vote for him because he's black.
It was a joke.
Ah.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 11:55:59 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:51:56 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 11:48:32 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Well, McCain hasn't had one earmark in twenty years of being a politician.
Which means he hasn't attached something frivolous to an existing bill to pass it.
But of course, he sees the war going on for a while.
Edit: Damn, I brought the McCain ads to this thread. >_>
lol
I don't really pay attention to politics. I don't give a crap about government, all I can really say is that 99.99% of them are corrupt bastards.
You really should start caring.
One of those men will become President of America.
I'm also moving to another country when I get older. I understand I should care for the next 10-15 years, but after that I'm either moving to Canada or Japan, depending on my job.
Don't really care right now, seeing as i'm canadian...
but I guess MCcain...
All the fossil fuels in the world are going to be gone within the next 100 years, so I don't care what they do about the oil and gas. It won't last, no matter what. I'm just waiting until the government finally gets a intercourse ing brain and starts giving us the incentives to go green.
Between the two of those, Ron Paul.
Between those two: Obama merely because he seems the most flexible when it comes to his policies. Last thing we need is ANOTHER stubborn old man in office who thinks he's always right...
There was a chart of all the candidates' positions, and Kucinich with Obama in close second had my interests. Since Kucinich is out, I'd like Obama to win.
This is a democratic year; people are going to vote for the democratic candidate.
Quote from: Rayquarian on June 11, 2008, 02:37:14 PM
This is a democratic year; people are going to vote for the democratic candidate.
After eight years of a mediocre Republican president, of course.
Who's Omama?
Quote from: SSBBRAWLIN on June 11, 2008, 02:51:36 PM
Who's Omama?
Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee for the 2008 Presidential Election.
Why would he be assassinated?
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 02:53:32 PM
Quote from: SSBBRAWLIN on June 11, 2008, 02:51:36 PM
Who's Omama?
Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee for the 2008 Presidential Election.
Oh, okay. I thought that was someone new because it had an M where the B went.
Quote from: Zovistograt on June 11, 2008, 01:58:32 PM
There was a chart of all the candidates' positions, and Kucinich with Obama in close second had my interests. Since Kucinich is out, I'd like Obama to win.
Well, unfotunately people never base this on policies. Every "democrat" i know liked Kucinich, but no one freakin voted for him. I'm fine with Obama. Better than Billary and more republican nonsense at this point X_X;;
Quote from: Rayquarian on June 11, 2008, 02:37:14 PM
This is a democratic year; people are going to vote for the democratic candidate.
Did you know that the Democratic Congress has lower approval ratings than Bush?
Quote from: Totla on June 11, 2008, 05:48:31 PM
Quote from: Rayquarian on June 11, 2008, 02:37:14 PM
This is a democratic year; people are going to vote for the democratic candidate.
Did you know that the Democratic Congress has lower approval ratings than Bush?
Again, all politics is is a popularity contest these days. And ppl only pay attention to the president. I betya over 70% of people in my district couldn't even name the representative
And did you also know many of the things Americans blame Bush for he has no control over.
It's mostly Congress. But then again, Americans are intercourse ing idiots.
Quote from: Totla on June 11, 2008, 05:56:17 PM
And did you also know many of the things Americans blame Bush for he has no control over.
It's mostly Congress. But then again, Americans are f***ing idiots.
blessing and curse of being the president.
Quote from: Totla on June 11, 2008, 05:56:17 PM
And did you also know many of the things Americans blame Bush for he has no control over.
It's mostly Congress. But then again, Americans are f***ing idiots.
Of course.
Quote from: Totla on June 11, 2008, 05:56:17 PM
And did you also know many of the things Americans blame Bush for he has no control over.
It's mostly Congress. But then again, Americans are intercourse ing idiots.
Yes. I point that out to plenty of people. He isn't the greatest president ever, but that doesn't mean you can tag all of the stupid things the government does on him.
Quote from: Birdie of Aces on June 11, 2008, 12:23:24 PM
All the fossil fuels in the world are going to be gone within the next 100 years, so I don't care what they do about the oil and gas. It won't last, no matter what. I'm just waiting until the government finally gets a f***ing brain and starts giving us the incentives to go green.
That is funny. It doesn't matter what we do because if the other countries don't give a crap, guess what, it won't happen. Also just start using manure as fuel already.
Quote from: Ridley on June 12, 2008, 10:03:35 AM
Quote from: Birdie of Aces on June 11, 2008, 12:23:24 PM
All the fossil fuels in the world are going to be gone within the next 100 years, so I don't care what they do about the oil and gas. It won't last, no matter what. I'm just waiting until the government finally gets a f***ing brain and starts giving us the incentives to go green.
That is funny. It doesn't matter what we do because if the other countries don't give a crap, guess what, it won't happen. Also just start using manure as fuel already.
I thought it's been proven that petroleum reserves will be gone within 50 years if everything is going the way it is now.
I do not want to know what will happen to the economies of Middle Eastern countries...
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 12, 2008, 10:18:55 AM
Quote from: Ridley on June 12, 2008, 10:03:35 AM
Quote from: Birdie of Aces on June 11, 2008, 12:23:24 PM
All the fossil fuels in the world are going to be gone within the next 100 years, so I don't care what they do about the oil and gas. It won't last, no matter what. I'm just waiting until the government finally gets a f***ing brain and starts giving us the incentives to go green.
That is funny. It doesn't matter what we do because if the other countries don't give a crap, guess what, it won't happen. Also just start using manure as fuel already.
I thought it's been proven that petroleum reserves will be gone within 50 years if everything is going the way it is now.
I do not want to know what will happen to the economies of Middle Eastern countries...
Tell me about it.
Quote from: Ridley on June 12, 2008, 11:34:03 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 12, 2008, 10:18:55 AM
Quote from: Ridley on June 12, 2008, 10:03:35 AM
Quote from: Birdie of Aces on June 11, 2008, 12:23:24 PM
All the fossil fuels in the world are going to be gone within the next 100 years, so I don't care what they do about the oil and gas. It won't last, no matter what. I'm just waiting until the government finally gets a f***ing brain and starts giving us the incentives to go green.
That is funny. It doesn't matter what we do because if the other countries don't give a crap, guess what, it won't happen. Also just start using manure as fuel already.
I thought it's been proven that petroleum reserves will be gone within 50 years if everything is going the way it is now.
I do not want to know what will happen to the economies of Middle Eastern countries...
Tell me about it.
What else could Saudi Arabia do? I don't think their land is very arable.
Also, Russia's economy is basically supported by oil.
Moscow has more millionaires than New York. It's all because of oil.
I doubt either one will do anything about the oil crisis, nor will any president after them until it's too late
Ron Paul.
Obama: CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE HOPE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE WHITE MEN SUCK CHANGE CHANGE HOPE NATIONALIZED HEALTHCARE WILL BANKRUPT THIS COUNTRY CHANGE CHANGE HOPE CHANGE
McCain: 4 more years of a slightly more logical version of Bush.
Hilary: AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Quote from: PsychoYoshi on June 12, 2008, 12:40:20 PM
Ron Paul.
Obama: CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE HOPE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE WHITE MEN SUCK CHANGE CHANGE HOPE NATIONALIZED HEALTHCARE WILL BANKRUPT THIS COUNTRY CHANGE CHANGE HOPE CHANGE
McCain: 4 more years of a slightly more logical version of Bush.
Hilary: AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
People really won't vote for something if it means raising taxes.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 12, 2008, 12:52:11 PM
Quote from: PsychoYoshi on June 12, 2008, 12:40:20 PM
Ron Paul.
Obama: CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE HOPE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE WHITE MEN SUCK CHANGE CHANGE HOPE NATIONALIZED HEALTHCARE WILL BANKRUPT THIS COUNTRY CHANGE CHANGE HOPE CHANGE
McCain: 4 more years of a slightly more logical version of Bush.
Hilary: AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
People really won't vote for something if it means raising taxes.
That is a lie. Here in NJ people vote to raise taxes for school all the time.
Quote from: Ridley on June 12, 2008, 01:13:32 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 12, 2008, 12:52:11 PM
Quote from: PsychoYoshi on June 12, 2008, 12:40:20 PM
Ron Paul.
Obama: CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE HOPE CHANGE CHANGE CHANGE WHITE MEN SUCK CHANGE CHANGE HOPE NATIONALIZED HEALTHCARE WILL BANKRUPT THIS COUNTRY CHANGE CHANGE HOPE CHANGE
McCain: 4 more years of a slightly more logical version of Bush.
Hilary: AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
People really won't vote for something if it means raising taxes.
That is a lie. Here in NJ people vote to raise taxes for school all the time.
Without a huge backlash?