when this baby hits 88 miles per hour
you're gonna see some serious poop.
1.21 JIGGAWATTS?!
GARBAGE DAY!!1
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on June 20, 2008, 07:50:27 PM
GARBAGE DAY!!1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7gIpuIVE3k
IT'S THE LIBYANS!1!!!1! :O
Quote from: Commissar Torgo on June 20, 2008, 08:30:23 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on June 20, 2008, 07:50:27 PM
GARBAGE DAY!!1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7gIpuIVE3k
Could have sworn that was from Back to the Future for some reason. D:
Also, http://youtube.com/watch?v=bnqtXOi1iaY
no! not the Doc!
At least at most I only have to wait seven more years for a Cubs world series win.
IT'S THE LIBYANS
THE LIBYANS
Quote from: Riosan on June 21, 2008, 09:58:57 AM
IT'S THE LIBYANS
THE LIBYANS
*gunshots*
*RPGs firing*
I never got to see Back to the Future. D:
Now I know what to rent from Blockbuster today. :)
Quote from: Java_Java on June 21, 2008, 10:04:45 AM
I never got to see Back to the Future. D:
Now I know what to rent from Blockbuster today. :)
I have the trilogy on DVD and my Zune. <3
Quote from: Riosan on June 21, 2008, 10:06:04 AM
Quote from: Java_Java on June 21, 2008, 10:04:45 AM
I never got to see Back to the Future. D:
Now I know what to rent from Blockbuster today. :)
I have the trilogy on DVD and my Zune. <3
The third movie was the worst of the trilogy. It wasn't that bad, it just wasn't as good as the first two.
They said if they made a new Rocky movie, they would make a new Back to the Future.
But that was before Michael J. Fox was diagnosed with Parkinson's. :(
I was expecting "it's over 9000!" to have been in this thread. I guess not...
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 21, 2008, 10:25:35 AM
The third movie was the worst of the trilogy. It wasn't that bad, it just wasn't as good as the first two.
2 > 3 =1
I loved 2, best of the trilogy. 3 was exciting, and it was a pretty good movie, and so was the first.
Quote from: Riosan on June 21, 2008, 10:46:47 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 21, 2008, 10:25:35 AM
The third movie was the worst of the trilogy. It wasn't that bad, it just wasn't as good as the first two.
2 > 3 =1
I loved 2, best of the trilogy. 3 was exciting, and it was a pretty good movie, and so was the first.
I loved 2 also, it was the best in the trilogy for sure.
The only part that excited me in the third one was the part in the 50's where they unearth the DeLorean and the part with the Time Train to get back to the 80's.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 21, 2008, 10:49:44 AM
Quote from: Riosan on June 21, 2008, 10:46:47 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 21, 2008, 10:25:35 AM
The third movie was the worst of the trilogy. It wasn't that bad, it just wasn't as good as the first two.
2 > 3 =1
I loved 2, best of the trilogy. 3 was exciting, and it was a pretty good movie, and so was the first.
I loved 2 also, it was the best in the trilogy for sure.
The only part that excited me in the third one was the part in the 50's where they unearth the DeLorean and the part with the Time Train to get back to the 80's.
oh, that crazy train
Quote from: Jono2 on June 21, 2008, 01:43:29 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 21, 2008, 10:49:44 AM
Quote from: Riosan on June 21, 2008, 10:46:47 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 21, 2008, 10:25:35 AM
The third movie was the worst of the trilogy. It wasn't that bad, it just wasn't as good as the first two.
2 > 3 =1
I loved 2, best of the trilogy. 3 was exciting, and it was a pretty good movie, and so was the first.
I loved 2 also, it was the best in the trilogy for sure.
The only part that excited me in the third one was the part in the 50's where they unearth the DeLorean and the part with the Time Train to get back to the 80's.
oh, that crazy train
So he says he wants all the time machines destroyed, and when he comes back from 1885, he doesn't destroy the train?
The GTA mods with the train and DeLorean that actually time travel are awesome.
Quote from: Riosan on June 21, 2008, 10:46:47 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 21, 2008, 10:25:35 AM
The third movie was the worst of the trilogy. It wasn't that bad, it just wasn't as good as the first two.
2 > 3 =1
I loved 2, best of the trilogy. 3 was exciting, and it was a pretty good movie, and so was the first.
The first was the best for me. The Second was confusing, and the third just didn't interest me that much.
As for Jurassic Park, 2>>1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3
Quote from: LinkXLR on June 21, 2008, 01:49:47 PM
Quote from: Riosan on June 21, 2008, 10:46:47 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 21, 2008, 10:25:35 AM
The third movie was the worst of the trilogy. It wasn't that bad, it just wasn't as good as the first two.
2 > 3 =1
I loved 2, best of the trilogy. 3 was exciting, and it was a pretty good movie, and so was the first.
The first was the best for me. The Second was confusing, and the third just didn't interest me that much.
As for Jurassic Park, 2>>1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3
The third one was the worst.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 21, 2008, 01:55:14 PM
Quote from: LinkXLR on June 21, 2008, 01:49:47 PM
Quote from: Riosan on June 21, 2008, 10:46:47 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 21, 2008, 10:25:35 AM
The third movie was the worst of the trilogy. It wasn't that bad, it just wasn't as good as the first two.
2 > 3 =1
I loved 2, best of the trilogy. 3 was exciting, and it was a pretty good movie, and so was the first.
The first was the best for me. The Second was confusing, and the third just didn't interest me that much.
As for Jurassic Park, 2>>1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3
The third one was the worst.
Not just the worst...it was terrible.
I don't even consider it part of the series.
Quote from: Java_Java on June 21, 2008, 11:42:50 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 21, 2008, 01:55:14 PM
Quote from: LinkXLR on June 21, 2008, 01:49:47 PM
Quote from: Riosan on June 21, 2008, 10:46:47 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 21, 2008, 10:25:35 AM
The third movie was the worst of the trilogy. It wasn't that bad, it just wasn't as good as the first two.
2 > 3 =1
I loved 2, best of the trilogy. 3 was exciting, and it was a pretty good movie, and so was the first.
The first was the best for me. The Second was confusing, and the third just didn't interest me that much.
As for Jurassic Park, 2>>1>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>3
The third one was the worst.
Not just the worst...it was terrible.
I don't even consider it part of the series.
What happens when Speilberg doesn't direct it, I suppose.
Oh god, Back to the Future is pretty much teh best trilogy ever, better than Halo, Jurrasic Park, Spiderman, and so many other trilogies.....
GREAT SCOTT!!!!1!!11!!!
Quote from: Linkfan71 on June 22, 2008, 04:02:27 AM
Oh god, Back to the Future is pretty much teh best trilogy ever, better than Halo, Jurrasic Park, Spiderman, and so many other trilogies.....
it's not hard to be better then halo, and for the third Jurrasic Park from what I heard they only had half a script and jut made up the rest as they went along
Quote from: Commissar Torgo on June 22, 2008, 07:47:21 AM
Quote from: Linkfan71 on June 22, 2008, 04:02:27 AM
Oh god, Back to the Future is pretty much teh best trilogy ever, better than Halo, Jurrasic Park, Spiderman, and so many other trilogies.....
it's not hard to be better then halo, and for the third Jurrasic Park from what I heard they only had half a script and jut made up the rest as they went along
Halo 3 was horrible X_X;;
eh, 3rd BTTF was pretty "meh" for me.
Best trilogy has to be either origional Star Wars or LOTR merely because all were great.