Personally, I just wont get a tahoe or a escalade this summer. But what about you guys?
POWER TO JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS \(º,º)/
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 21, 2008, 10:02:23 PM
POWER TO JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS \(º,º)/
Lol but there SUVS look so gay.
They aren't going out of business any time soon.
Make cars people want, and they'll buy American. People want fuel efficiency, yet the Big Three still is still making SUVs and GM is still making Hummers.
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:03:59 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 21, 2008, 10:02:23 PM
POWER TO JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS \(º,º)/
Lol but there SUVS look so gay.
At least they can make them fuel efficient.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:06:40 PM
They aren't going out of business any time soon.
Make cars people want, and they'll buy American. People want fuel efficiency, yet the Big Three still is still making SUVs and GM is still making Hummers.
We had an argument in class about all the 3 making big gas drinkers and SUVS but people cant seem to afford those cars on the long. But people still want to get SUVS cause they look cool like me :/. They got 10 months left unless they get the bail out which wont guarantee anything.
No, I think. Thank God those poop holes are going out of business. American cars suck.
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:09:39 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:06:40 PM
They aren't going out of business any time soon.
Make cars people want, and they'll buy American. People want fuel efficiency, yet the Big Three still is still making SUVs and GM is still making Hummers.
We had an argument in class about all the 3 making big gas drinkers and SUVS but people cant seem to afford those cars on the long. But people still want to get SUVS cause they look cool like me :/. They got 10 months left unless they get the bail out which wont guarantee anything.
The thing is, the general public isn't buying American because no one wants cars that aren't fuel-efficient. American cars never really have been fuel efficient until a few years ago because the Big 3 are JUST realizing that people want fuel efficiency.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:15:45 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:09:39 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:06:40 PM
They aren't going out of business any time soon.
Make cars people want, and they'll buy American. People want fuel efficiency, yet the Big Three still is still making SUVs and GM is still making Hummers.
We had an argument in class about all the 3 making big gas drinkers and SUVS but people cant seem to afford those cars on the long. But people still want to get SUVS cause they look cool like me :/. They got 10 months left unless they get the bail out which wont guarantee anything.
The thing is, the general public isn't buying American because no one wants cars that aren't fuel-efficient. American cars never really have been fuel efficient until a few years ago because the Big 3 are JUST realizing that people want fuel efficiency.
But if they get rid of there SUV's there going to make a big mistake D:!!!!
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
The car style is too big to be fuel efficient, unless it's a hybrid.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
1. We're not running out of oil, and won't be for a while. The problem is that who actually
holds the oil.
2. Carbon emissions? *yawn* Too lazy to get into my global warming argument.
3. Gas prices are going down because people aren't driving. People aren't driving because gas was 4 dollars per gallon. Once people go "hey gas is $1.89 i think ill start driving again", gas will go up to 4 dollars, and the cycle will continue in that fashion until we find an alternate fuel source.
Quote from: Byte link=topic=28992.msg424P518#msg424518 date=1227359498
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
1. We're not running out of oil, and won't be for a while. The problem is that who actually holds the oil.
2. Carbon emissions? *yawn* Too lazy to get into my global warming argument.
3. Gas prices are going down because people aren't driving. People aren't driving because gas was 4 dollars per gallon. Once people go "hey gas is $1.89 i think ill start driving again", gas will go up to 4 dollars, and the cycle will continue in that fashion until we find an alternate fuel source.
People started driving like crazy here now cause gas went down already :/ My mom even filled like 5 of those gas containers lol.
Quote from: phatyo on November 22, 2008, 09:58:46 AM
Quote from: Byte link=topic=28992.msg424P518#msg424518 date=1227359498
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
1. We're not running out of oil, and won't be for a while. The problem is that who actually holds the oil.
2. Carbon emissions? *yawn* Too lazy to get into my global warming argument.
3. Gas prices are going down because people aren't driving. People aren't driving because gas was 4 dollars per gallon. Once people go "hey gas is $1.89 i think ill start driving again", gas will go up to 4 dollars, and the cycle will continue in that fashion until we find an alternate fuel source.
People started driving like crazy here now cause gas went down already :/ My mom even filled like 5 of those gas containers lol.
You actually get the point for once, amazing. People are going to start doing that everywhere because gas is under 2.50 at the highest, I think, and then gas is going to go back up. It's an endless cycle until we have a true alternate fuel source.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:06:40 PM
They aren't going out of business any time soon.
Make cars people want, and they'll buy American. People want fuel efficiency, yet the Big Three still is still making SUVs and GM is still making Hummers.
Thing is, there are some people who'll still buy those.
Two cars that i'd get if I could would be either the new Corvette ZR1 or the new 2009 Dodge Ram. But my parents need the money to resurface the hardwood floor (OMFG SPLINTER CENTRAL), redo the drive way, which is a cracked up piece of s*** that leaks water into the basement (which translates into we got flooded several times down there due to almost non-stop heavy rain, and had to reduce the potential of black mold formation, or remove what mold we had. Black mold isn't healthy to have in a house.), see if we can get a new garage, not to mention the former car is 100K. At least it's much cheaper than other cars of similar performance. The 2009 Dodge Ram is a beastly truck that'd be awesome to have.
Did I forget to mention that bankruptcy doesn't always translate into the utter destruction of a company. Occasionally, if you file for file 19 bankrupty protection, it can give you time to resturcture. But not always.
No, I don't think I'll be affected.
But bailout or no bailout, they're going to go out of business. The bailout will just delay it.
Unless they start making cars people want.
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:03:59 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 21, 2008, 10:02:23 PM
POWER TO JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS \(º,º)/
Lol but there SUVS look so gay.
The Rogue looks amazing. i don't know what you're talking about. D:
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 21, 2008, 10:02:23 PM
POWER TO JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS \(º,º)/
lol, I saw the show in your sig at anime club today...so random and spastic...
Anyhoo. they're not going out of business. Ford has some money leftover for a while, but we'll see how long that lasts.
Besides, it's their own darn fault they're losing money. Make cheaper and fuel efficient cars instead of those hulking trash bins they make now and people will buy it. And they have the nerve to ask the public to bail them out. If I were a lawmaker I'd say HELL NO you dug your own grave now live in it.
Quote from: Byte on November 22, 2008, 06:11:38 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
1. We're not running out of oil, and won't be for a while. The problem is that who actually holds the oil.
2. Carbon emissions? *yawn* Too lazy to get into my global warming argument.
3. Gas prices are going down because people aren't driving. People aren't driving because gas was 4 dollars per gallon. Once people go "hey gas is $1.89 i think ill start driving again", gas will go up to 4 dollars, and the cycle will continue in that fashion until we find an alternate fuel source.
Ahhh, I was going to comment on this, but, you beet me to it.
(I was too friggin' busy reading through that MS paint adventures)
Quote from: Nayrman on November 22, 2008, 03:12:17 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 21, 2008, 10:02:23 PM
POWER TO JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS \(º,º)/
lol, I saw the show in your sig at anime club today...so random and spastic...
olol, but did you like it?
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 22, 2008, 07:33:49 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on November 22, 2008, 03:12:17 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 21, 2008, 10:02:23 PM
POWER TO JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS \(º,º)/
lol, I saw the show in your sig at anime club today...so random and spastic...
olol, but did you like it?
not particularly. I did like Xam'd and Kurenai though (despite kurenai being kinda slow though)
Oh, and I would be affected, but they aren't going out of business anytime soon.
Oh, and I would be affected, but they aren't going out of business anytime soon.
That bailout is going to go through.
Quote from: Nayrman on November 22, 2008, 07:45:16 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 22, 2008, 07:33:49 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on November 22, 2008, 03:12:17 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 21, 2008, 10:02:23 PM
POWER TO JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS \(º,º)/
lol, I saw the show in your sig at anime club today...so random and spastic...
olol, but did you like it?
not particularly. I did like Xam'd and Kurenai though (despite kurenai being kinda slow though)
what's the anime called? I might wanna check it out
Quote from: Commissar Torgo on November 23, 2008, 08:10:13 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on November 22, 2008, 07:45:16 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 22, 2008, 07:33:49 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on November 22, 2008, 03:12:17 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 21, 2008, 10:02:23 PM
POWER TO JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS \(º,º)/
lol, I saw the show in your sig at anime club today...so random and spastic...
olol, but did you like it?
not particularly. I did like Xam'd and Kurenai though (despite kurenai being kinda slow though)
what's the anime called? I might wanna check it out
Kyouran Kazoku Nikki.
You can watch it on crunchyroll.com in h.264 quality.
Quote from: britneymahboy on November 21, 2008, 10:09:39 PM
No, I think. Thank God those arseholes are going out of business. American cars suck.
Ford Mustang?
Quote from: HTA on November 23, 2008, 04:38:40 PM
Quote from: britneymahboy on November 21, 2008, 10:09:39 PM
No, I think. Thank God those arseholes are going out of business. American cars suck.
Ford Mustang?
My family owned one for a few years, and it slipped on some wet leaves and fishtailed into another car.
Quote from: Byte on November 22, 2008, 06:11:38 AM
1. We're not running out of oil, and won't be for a while. The problem is that who actually holds the oil.
So? Just because there's still oil left, doesn't mean we shouldn't conserve it. The better we are at reducing the amount of oil we consume, the more time we gain to find alternatives for the day when oil does finally run out. It will run eventually, and no one can deny that.
Quote2. Carbon emissions? *yawn* Too lazy to get into my global warming argument.
Again, I don't see why reducing these is a bad thing. Even if you disagree with global warming, it's still good for the environment. But god forbid anyone give a poop about that.
Quote3. Gas prices are going down because people aren't driving. People aren't driving because gas was 4 dollars per gallon. Once people go "hey gas is $1.89 i think ill start driving again", gas will go up to 4 dollars, and the cycle will continue in that fashion until we find an alternate fuel source.
I disagree, people are still aren't driving as much as they used to, since people are starting to realize that relying on low gas prices to remain low is a bad idea.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 23, 2008, 04:50:07 PM
Quote from: HTA on November 23, 2008, 04:38:40 PM
Quote from: britneymahboy on November 21, 2008, 10:09:39 PM
No, I think. Thank God those arseholes are going out of business. American cars suck.
Ford Mustang?
My family owned one for a few years, and it slipped on some wet leaves and fishtailed into another car.
Cadillac Escalade :D
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a poop if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a poop if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a poop about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a poop! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a poop if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a poop about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a poop! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
Life isn't about being the biggest. Just look at NSF vs. NS2.
NS2's the biggest, but who's the best?
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a poop if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a poop about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a poop! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
err
Perhaps you should rethink your priorities
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 25, 2008, 05:32:34 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a poop if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a poop about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a poop! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
err
Perhaps you should rethink your priorities
He probably will change once he has to start paying for gas.....
If you want non-fuel efficient cars, get one from the late 60's/early 70's. They practically made them waste fuel on PURPOSE.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 05:38:23 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 25, 2008, 05:32:34 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a s*** if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a s*** about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a s***! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
err
Perhaps you should rethink your priorities
He probably will change once he has to start paying for gas.....
If you want non-fuel efficient cars, get one from the late 60's/early 70's. They practically made them waste fuel on PURPOSE.
Planned Obsolecence...
you can blame 1950's home appliance manufacturers for that. The days of fuel efficiency are here at last. Maybe stupid ass Detroit will finally take notice now that Japan is kicking their sorry asses...
Quote from: Nayrman on November 25, 2008, 05:45:35 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 05:38:23 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 25, 2008, 05:32:34 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a s*** if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a s*** about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a s***! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
err
Perhaps you should rethink your priorities
He probably will change once he has to start paying for gas.....
If you want non-fuel efficient cars, get one from the late 60's/early 70's. They practically made them waste fuel on PURPOSE.
Planned Obsolecence...
you can blame 1950's home appliance manufacturers for that. The days of fuel efficiency are here at last. Maybe stupid ass Detroit will finally take notice now that Japan is kicking their sorry asses...
They have had the ability to make fuel efficient vehicles LONG before Japan started dominating American car sales. It was their fault that it took them so long to discover what the consumers wanted.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 06:14:20 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on November 25, 2008, 05:45:35 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 05:38:23 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 25, 2008, 05:32:34 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a s*** if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a s*** about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a s***! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
err
Perhaps you should rethink your priorities
He probably will change once he has to start paying for gas.....
If you want non-fuel efficient cars, get one from the late 60's/early 70's. They practically made them waste fuel on PURPOSE.
Planned Obsolecence...
you can blame 1950's home appliance manufacturers for that. The days of fuel efficiency are here at last. Maybe stupid ass Detroit will finally take notice now that Japan is kicking their sorry asses...
They have had the ability to make fuel efficient vehicles LONG before Japan started dominating American car sales. It was their fault that it took them so long to discover what the consumers wanted.
Yes the consumers want, not what the kids who want to look like they got money infront of everyone at school! I'm going to cry my eyes if the Escalade go out of production ;_;
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 10:52:36 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 06:14:20 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on November 25, 2008, 05:45:35 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 05:38:23 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 25, 2008, 05:32:34 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a s*** if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a s*** about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a s***! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
err
Perhaps you should rethink your priorities
He probably will change once he has to start paying for gas.....
If you want non-fuel efficient cars, get one from the late 60's/early 70's. They practically made them waste fuel on PURPOSE.
Planned Obsolecence...
you can blame 1950's home appliance manufacturers for that. The days of fuel efficiency are here at last. Maybe stupid ass Detroit will finally take notice now that Japan is kicking their sorry asses...
They have had the ability to make fuel efficient vehicles LONG before Japan started dominating American car sales. It was their fault that it took them so long to discover what the consumers wanted.
Yes the consumers want, not what the kids who want to look like they got money infront of everyone at school! I'm going to cry my eyes if the Escalade go out of production ;_;
Um, you're supposed to be associating yourself with the former. Are you seriously siding with the latter?
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 26, 2008, 09:38:39 AM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 10:52:36 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 06:14:20 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on November 25, 2008, 05:45:35 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 05:38:23 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 25, 2008, 05:32:34 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a s*** if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a s*** about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a s***! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
err
Perhaps you should rethink your priorities
He probably will change once he has to start paying for gas.....
If you want non-fuel efficient cars, get one from the late 60's/early 70's. They practically made them waste fuel on PURPOSE.
Planned Obsolecence...
you can blame 1950's home appliance manufacturers for that. The days of fuel efficiency are here at last. Maybe stupid ass Detroit will finally take notice now that Japan is kicking their sorry asses...
They have had the ability to make fuel efficient vehicles LONG before Japan started dominating American car sales. It was their fault that it took them so long to discover what the consumers wanted.
Yes the consumers want, not what the kids who want to look like they got money infront of everyone at school! I'm going to cry my eyes if the Escalade go out of production ;_;
Um, you're supposed to be associating yourself with the former. Are you seriously siding with the latter?
Lulz wuuut???
I think that there is a law in the USA saying that any car or truck that claims to be a 2010 model or later has to get at least 25 miles to the gallon.
That's possible with sports cars, but practically impossible for huge cars like Hummers and Escalades.
Quote from: phatyo on November 26, 2008, 10:18:44 AM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 26, 2008, 09:38:39 AM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 10:52:36 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 06:14:20 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on November 25, 2008, 05:45:35 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 05:38:23 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 25, 2008, 05:32:34 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a s*** if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a s*** about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a s***! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
err
Perhaps you should rethink your priorities
He probably will change once he has to start paying for gas.....
If you want non-fuel efficient cars, get one from the late 60's/early 70's. They practically made them waste fuel on PURPOSE.
Planned Obsolecence...
you can blame 1950's home appliance manufacturers for that. The days of fuel efficiency are here at last. Maybe stupid ass Detroit will finally take notice now that Japan is kicking their sorry asses...
They have had the ability to make fuel efficient vehicles LONG before Japan started dominating American car sales. It was their fault that it took them so long to discover what the consumers wanted.
Yes the consumers want, not what the kids who want to look like they got money infront of everyone at school! I'm going to cry my eyes if the Escalade go out of production ;_;
Um, you're supposed to be associating yourself with the former. Are you seriously siding with the latter?
Lulz wuuut???
I think he is.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 26, 2008, 10:24:21 AM
I think that there is a law in the USA saying that any car or truck that claims to be a 2010 model or later has to get at least 25 miles to the gallon.
That's possible with sports cars, but practically impossible for huge cars like Hummers and Escalades.
The new Cadillac Escalade gets 28 Gallons >:] Buts its also 30K more expensive and a Hybrid :/
Quote from: phatyo on November 26, 2008, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 26, 2008, 10:24:21 AM
I think that there is a law in the USA saying that any car or truck that claims to be a 2010 model or later has to get at least 25 miles to the gallon.
That's possible with sports cars, but practically impossible for huge cars like Hummers and Escalades.
The new Cadillac Escalade gets 28 Gallons >:] Buts its also 30K more expensive and a Hybrid :/
Well, that's the only kind that they can make.
Just forget about Hummers, those things will never get that much.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 26, 2008, 10:47:04 AM
Quote from: phatyo on November 26, 2008, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 26, 2008, 10:24:21 AM
I think that there is a law in the USA saying that any car or truck that claims to be a 2010 model or later has to get at least 25 miles to the gallon.
That's possible with sports cars, but practically impossible for huge cars like Hummers and Escalades.
The new Cadillac Escalade gets 28 Gallons >:] Buts its also 30K more expensive and a Hybrid :/
Well, that's the only kind that they can make.
Just forget about Hummers, those things will never get that much.
Hummers looks gay anyway.
Quote from: phatyo on November 26, 2008, 10:49:45 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 26, 2008, 10:47:04 AM
Quote from: phatyo on November 26, 2008, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 26, 2008, 10:24:21 AM
I think that there is a law in the USA saying that any car or truck that claims to be a 2010 model or later has to get at least 25 miles to the gallon.
That's possible with sports cars, but practically impossible for huge cars like Hummers and Escalades.
The new Cadillac Escalade gets 28 Gallons >:] Buts its also 30K more expensive and a Hybrid :/
Well, that's the only kind that they can make.
Just forget about Hummers, those things will never get that much.
Hummers looks gay anyway.
They weren't meant to be civilian cars anyway.
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 26, 2008, 10:51:53 AM
Quote from: phatyo on November 26, 2008, 10:49:45 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 26, 2008, 10:47:04 AM
Quote from: phatyo on November 26, 2008, 10:30:25 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 26, 2008, 10:24:21 AM
I think that there is a law in the USA saying that any car or truck that claims to be a 2010 model or later has to get at least 25 miles to the gallon.
That's possible with sports cars, but practically impossible for huge cars like Hummers and Escalades.
The new Cadillac Escalade gets 28 Gallons >:] Buts its also 30K more expensive and a Hybrid :/
Well, that's the only kind that they can make.
Just forget about Hummers, those things will never get that much.
Hummers looks gay anyway.
They weren't meant to be civilian cars anyway.
Glad I share the same opinion as someone else on NSF :)
Men who buy Hummers are just trying to compensate for something else.
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 10:52:36 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 06:14:20 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on November 25, 2008, 05:45:35 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 05:38:23 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 25, 2008, 05:32:34 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a s*** if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a s*** about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a s***! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
err
Perhaps you should rethink your priorities
He probably will change once he has to start paying for gas.....
If you want non-fuel efficient cars, get one from the late 60's/early 70's. They practically made them waste fuel on PURPOSE.
Planned Obsolecence...
you can blame 1950's home appliance manufacturers for that. The days of fuel efficiency are here at last. Maybe stupid ass Detroit will finally take notice now that Japan is kicking their sorry asses...
They have had the ability to make fuel efficient vehicles LONG before Japan started dominating American car sales. It was their fault that it took them so long to discover what the consumers wanted.
Yes the consumers want, not what the kids who want to look like they got money infront of everyone at school! I'm going to cry my eyes if the Escalade go out of production ;_;
Wait what.
You want an SUV just so you can look like you have money.
...
No words can describe my rage.
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 30, 2008, 12:32:58 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 10:52:36 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 06:14:20 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on November 25, 2008, 05:45:35 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 05:38:23 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 25, 2008, 05:32:34 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a s*** if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a s*** about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a s***! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
err
Perhaps you should rethink your priorities
He probably will change once he has to start paying for gas.....
If you want non-fuel efficient cars, get one from the late 60's/early 70's. They practically made them waste fuel on PURPOSE.
Planned Obsolecence...
you can blame 1950's home appliance manufacturers for that. The days of fuel efficiency are here at last. Maybe stupid ass Detroit will finally take notice now that Japan is kicking their sorry asses...
They have had the ability to make fuel efficient vehicles LONG before Japan started dominating American car sales. It was their fault that it took them so long to discover what the consumers wanted.
Yes the consumers want, not what the kids who want to look like they got money infront of everyone at school! I'm going to cry my eyes if the Escalade go out of production ;_;
Wait what.
You want an SUV just so you can look like you have money.
...
No words can describe my rage.
Wouldn't a sports car say you have money, not an SUV?
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 30, 2008, 12:35:58 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 30, 2008, 12:32:58 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 10:52:36 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 06:14:20 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on November 25, 2008, 05:45:35 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 25, 2008, 05:38:23 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on November 25, 2008, 05:32:34 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 25, 2008, 02:22:17 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on November 25, 2008, 02:15:01 PM
Quote from: phatyo on November 21, 2008, 10:24:58 PM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on November 21, 2008, 10:21:09 PM
How is conserving oil, reducing carbon emissions, and lowering gas prices a big mistake?
Well the way the SUV's look is just cool. They need to add those oil reductions in the SUVs :/ or is that not possible?
Nobody gives a s*** if they look cool if their Hummer XXXXXL or whatever is getting 2mpg.
I do. I don't give a s*** about what the mpg is really. Also I'm not the only one who dosnt give a s***! I want big cars >:I If the car looks small and puny and its gets 30 mpg thats good, but I want a big car that just looks cool!
err
Perhaps you should rethink your priorities
He probably will change once he has to start paying for gas.....
If you want non-fuel efficient cars, get one from the late 60's/early 70's. They practically made them waste fuel on PURPOSE.
Planned Obsolecence...
you can blame 1950's home appliance manufacturers for that. The days of fuel efficiency are here at last. Maybe stupid ass Detroit will finally take notice now that Japan is kicking their sorry asses...
They have had the ability to make fuel efficient vehicles LONG before Japan started dominating American car sales. It was their fault that it took them so long to discover what the consumers wanted.
Yes the consumers want, not what the kids who want to look like they got money infront of everyone at school! I'm going to cry my eyes if the Escalade go out of production ;_;
Wait what.
You want an SUV just so you can look like you have money.
...
No words can describe my rage.
Wouldn't a sports car say you have money, not an SUV?
Well by sports car if you mean a porch yeah but then again I just want an Escalade cause of the urban environment that I'm around. Sports car are more expensive but whats the point I just want something that looks big and shows people I can manage money >_>. The first impression I get when I see a guy driving an escalade is young and must have a business or something. The live style that I want. Also Silver don't worry I have in my bank account the amount of 17.00$ but my mom has the money to buy me a car so its not my monies its my moms monies :3
My mommie dun got me a porch fo my bday.
Quote from: Java_Java on November 30, 2008, 01:51:11 PM
My mommie dun got me a porch fo my bday.
Lol she did? O_O!
Quote from: phatyo on November 30, 2008, 01:49:15 PM
I just want something that looks big and shows people I can manage money >_>.
um...in that case, you'd want a hybrid ultra-compact hatchback to show you're sensible and wouldn't spend a lot of money on a car for looks :3
Phatyo, you are the epitome of what is wrong with America's youth.
Quote from: Friendly Hostile on December 01, 2008, 02:50:11 PM
Phatyo, you are the epitome of what is wrong with America's youth.
North American youth, he's also Canadian, I guess.