NSFCD

[bg-color=white]That batch is to choose your favorite of the ranks.

Now, to enlighten you to a few things:

-The users wanted a total rank overhaul.
-Most users wanted more selectable ranks. (This is remedied by constantly adding the highest post based rank - maybe former staff ranks could be there as well? Hmmm...)
-Users DID NOT want arcade related games.
-Users wanted pips of sorts. Will be done.
-Blue is by far the most popular color.[/bg-color]

[bg-color=#9932CC]RANK DETAILS:

Stragg - comes from HHGttG
Diagnotician - comes from House
Commanding Officer - Advance Wars
Great Lord - Fire Emblem
The Guy - I want to be the guy
Weeaboo - all of you :O
Primid - Brawl
Fawful - Mario and Luigi series
Ace Attorney - ie. Phoenix Wright
The Rawk - Paper Mario (Rawk hawk)
Ace of Spades - in Lemmy Kilmeisters voice
King of All Cosmos - Katamari Damacy[/bg-color]

[bg-color=#66CD00]OTHER POLL QUESTIONS (ANSWER BY REPLYING)

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke?
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul?
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status?
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be?

POLL ENDS IN 3 DAYS[/bg-color]

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? No.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Yes.
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes.
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Primid, I guess.

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke?

Yes

2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul?

Yes

3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status?

Don't care, so no.

4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be?

Weeaboo

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? Yes
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Yes
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Out of those...Ace Attorney

1. yes
2. yes
3. We hardly have any relation to nintendo anymore, so na
4. Weeaboo

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? Yes.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Yes.
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes. We are a gaymen forum after all.
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Weeaboo.

[bg-color=Green]1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? No, but it should be called something else, just not Slowpoke.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Sure, why not?
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes.
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Fawful. I HAVE FURY![/bg-color]
[bg-color=Navy]When it comes to pips, I can help a little, I have before ;3[/bg-color]

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? No.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? I like it, so yes
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Gaming, yes, Nintendo, not necessarily
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Ace of Spades

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? No.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Yes.
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes.
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? even though I already have the one I like, I'd say Ace Attorney...

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke?
YES! YES!
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul?
NO! NO!
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status?
YES! YES!
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be?
NO! NO! Oh wait, I'm going to go for Ace Attorney

1. Sure
2. Yesss
3. Gaming, yes.
4. Weeaboo

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? yes
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? sure
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? yes
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? The Guy

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke?
Yes

2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul?
What the poop is that? I'll say yes.

3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status?
Yes

4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be?
The Guy

You people suck, wanting to rename BoSD.

Quote from: Doodle on November 17, 2009, 05:31:45 AM
You people suck, wanting to rename BSoD.

What's BSoD again?
Ban Serious of Discussion?

Quote from: JrDude ½ on November 17, 2009, 01:51:39 PM
What's BSoD again?
Ban Serious of Discussion?

Bane of Serious Discussion, as in one who is banned.  I think.  Dictionary.com (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bane) says otherwise.  Concept is still the same though.

Quote from: Lotos on November 17, 2009, 05:06:48 PM
Bane of Serious Discussion, as in one who is banned.  I think.  Dictionary.com (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bane) says otherwise.  Concept is still the same though.

I was pointing out the fact that he put the letters in the wrong order dumbass.

Quote from: JrDude ½ on November 17, 2009, 05:17:59 PM
I was pointing out the fact that he put the letters in the wrong order dumbass.

Trying a little too hard to be badass there, hm?

Quote from: Lotos on November 17, 2009, 05:21:32 PM
Trying a little too hard to be badass there, hm?

If you mean my response to Doodle, I'm just being a grammar nazi.

If you mean my response to you, then you're obviously a dumbass like I said.

Quote from: Kilroy on November 15, 2009, 09:13:47 AM
1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? No.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? I like it, so yes
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Gaming, yes, Nintendo, not necessarily
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Ace of Spades

I wholeheartedly agree. :)

Quote from: JrDude ½ on November 17, 2009, 01:51:39 PM
What's BSoD again?
Ban Serious of Discussion?

Blue Screen of Death?

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? Yes.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Sure, it why not?
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes to both.
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Weeaboo.

Quote from: JrDude ½ on November 17, 2009, 01:51:39 PM
What's BSoD again?
BanE Serious of Discussion?

fixed.

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? Sure.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Sure.
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes - especially the 'Gaming' part.
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Ace of Spades.

I missed all three phases I think :(

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? Don't care
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Why not?
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes, or at least stay close to it.
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would i be? bumpty The Rawk.

If weeaboo becomes user selectable, can it be the same color that it was when Zovi was leading the Otaku Brigade?

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? No.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Yes.
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Sure, at least remain close.
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Ace of Spades, i guess. idrc though.