Bluaki got the 500,000th post ever on NSFCD, with this gem of a post.
http://nsfcd.com/index.php?topic=575.msg529293#msg529293
:P
Blu's prize will be decided soon.
Now we're considered a "big board" by SMF standards. Hooray!
NO SHIT SHERLOCK
Please excuse his manners.
Now apologize and say congrats, dumbass.
Congratulations Bluaki.
Good puppy. Here's a biscuit.
I was off by 13 seconds. ;__;
Congrats, blu.
15 seconds after Doodle. D:
If I made a post 28 seconds earlier... ;-;
haha
This is what I get for posting maybe once every day or two :3
Nice job, Blu.
I wasnt even online D:
Quote from: Blue on February 02, 2010, 01:58:00 PM
NO poop SHERLOCK
Please excuse his manners.
Now apologize and say congrats, dumbass.
Congratulations Bluaki.
Good puppy. Here's a biscuit.
I SAW THAT EDIT
Quote from: Doodle on February 02, 2010, 02:04:45 PM
I SAW THAT EDIT
;_;
I had a lot of fun with that edit. Or rather, what you didn't see. :3
THANK GOD
BLUAKI I LOVE YOU
I'M SO FUCKING GLAD YOU WON
CONGRATS, SIS
Thank god it wasn't K
grats blu
Quote from: Henry Touchdown on February 02, 2010, 03:58:20 PM
Thank god it wasn't K
grats blu
two awesome gets are too much for me.
Also, I didn't want to get 500K. If i was online around that time, I honestly wouldn't post. :/
Quote from: Blue on February 02, 2010, 02:37:40 PM
;_;
I had a lot of fun with that edit. Or rather, what you didn't see. :3
I SAW EVERYTHING
Quote from: K on February 02, 2010, 04:08:01 PM
two awesome gets are too much for me.
Also, I didn't want to get 500K. If i was online around that time, I honestly wouldn't post. :/
bull
whaddafx, i didnt even think we were close
'Gratz, Blu, but isn't there supposed to be a screenshot?
Quote from: Red on February 02, 2010, 07:26:02 PM
'Gratz, Blu, but isn't there supposed to be a screenshot?
No.
Screenshots don't count becasue there is no mark on the posts that say 500,000. We're past that number in post numbers.
The way I understood it, when Mack told us he wanted a screenshot, was that the timestamp alongside the post number would tell us who had the 500k post, since with post deletions it's impossible to read the 500k post otherwise.
(http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/8678/screenshotbn.png)
Like this. Your post was 500,118 at 9:48:40. Both the stats and your post have the same timestamp so we know it's accurate.
As of your post number (529413) and the current post count (500120), there are 29297 missing posts on the forum that have been deleted.
Bluaki's post was 529293 - Four posts were deleted between now and his post, and you never know what was deleted before his post.
It simply makes it impossible to know that his post was accurate without a screenshot.
I missed it. Ah well.
Quote from: Red on February 02, 2010, 07:54:16 PM
The way I understood it, when Mack told us he wanted a screenshot, was that the timestamp alongside the post number would tell us who had the 500k post, since with post deletions it's impossible to read the 500k post otherwise.
(http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/8678/screenshotbn.png)
Like this. Your post was 500,118 at 9:48:40. Both the stats and your post have the same timestamp so we know it's accurate.
As of your post number (529413) and the current post count (500120), there are 29297 missing posts on the forum that have been deleted.
Bluaki's post was 529293 - Four posts were deleted between now and his post, and you never know what was deleted before his post.
It simply makes it impossible to know that his post was accurate without a screenshot.
The purpose of the screen shot was to prevent bullpoop from people deleting, but I think we all agree that no one did such things.
Quote from: Henry Touchdown on February 02, 2010, 08:10:56 PM
The purpose of the screen shot was to prevent bullpoop from people deleting, but I think we all agree that no one did such things.
The admins would have to check for certain, but regardless of that we don't know what's accurate or not. Maybe someone didn't delete for the sake of stopping the 500k, but deleted a redundant or double post?
Quote from: Red on February 02, 2010, 08:12:14 PM
The admins would have to check for certain, but regardless of that we don't know what's accurate or not. Maybe someone didn't delete for the sake of stopping the 500k, but deleted a redundant or double post?
I already checked, it was blu.
I had two tabs open at the time, and blu posted right when the counter went to 500,000.
We were there. We checked. It was blu.
Alrighty then.
'Grats, Blu.
If i delete posts what happens :3
Nothing. :U
Technically, I would have 500k get, since I have 499,999 get.
Quote from: Doodle on February 03, 2010, 04:24:16 AM
Nothing. :U
Technically, I would have 500k get, since I have 499,999 get.
um, Mr. 500,001 would get it, sir.
but that's you also.
I can delete multiple posts :P
but i wont, since again, i didn't want this get.
Quote from: K on February 03, 2010, 04:10:37 AM
If i delete posts what happens :3
You get banned.
Quote from: Henry Touchdown on February 03, 2010, 12:29:44 PM
You get banned.
No, I intercourse with his profile and permissions and make posting here a living hell.
Go bluaki!
hurrah! We've reached an arbitrary post count!
Quote from: Friendly Hostile on February 03, 2010, 02:10:58 PM
No, I intercourse with his profile and permissions and make posting here a living hell.
There's a delightful mod that can do that.
Also Kaos. Even if you deleted posts, we'd still count blu as the winner.
We couldn't give two intercourse s as to what happens past this. We're a big forum now.
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on February 03, 2010, 07:30:43 PM
There's a delightful mod that can do that.
That takes all the fun out of it.
Quote from: Friendly Hostile on February 03, 2010, 10:27:59 PM
That takes all the fun out of it.
Not when they're raiding. I loved intercourse ing with that raider and the annoy user function. Considering the redirect was to a virus =D
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on February 03, 2010, 07:30:43 PM
There's a delightful mod that can do that.
How exactly does it work?
Not that I wanna see it. D: