NSFCD

Generally Speaking => Power On => Topic started by: Tupin on August 02, 2010, 06:07:41 PM

Title: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: Tupin on August 02, 2010, 06:07:41 PM
Yeah, Best Buy had a setup with glasses and a demo reel of 3DTV, and I actually got to try it out. Seeing the TV in 3D mode without glasses is like watching an old 3D movie, it's all blurry. The second you put it on, you can see it. Nothing really seems to come out at your face, but it does add some depth to the picture.

But yeah, it looks okay. I'm eager to see if I see similar things with the 3DS.
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: Nayrman on August 02, 2010, 06:32:23 PM
So...it's basically a waste of money then?

Oh, but wait, you can watch CLASH OF THE TITANS IN SHITTY 3D VISION AT HOME NOW! *slaps down 2000 dollars* SOLD MY FRIEND!
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: Level_9_Chao on August 03, 2010, 10:09:25 PM
I watched our store's demo one for like 10 seconds before the Black Eyed Peas came on it. This was reason enough never to buy a 3D TV.
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: Silverhawk79 on August 03, 2010, 10:23:13 PM
I'll have to try it out, but I really doubt it will ever catch on.
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: SkyMyl on August 04, 2010, 08:31:00 AM
Never seen a demo of a 3DTV, but I wouldn't buy one. It's just not worth it.
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: Shujinco2 on August 04, 2010, 11:03:27 AM
Quote from: SkyMyl on August 04, 2010, 08:31:00 AM
Never seen a demo of a 3DTV, but I wouldn't buy one. It's just not worth it.
This.

I don't think they could make a more obvious gimmick.
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: ThePowerOfOne on August 04, 2010, 03:56:07 PM
3D has been around for years, why would they suddenly start selling all this 3D crap? It's cool in movies, but watching it all the time at home seems a little nauseating.

Also, can't any tv show 3D? Didn't the Grammy's or something have a 3D Michael Jackson tribute?
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: Shujinco2 on August 04, 2010, 09:06:03 PM
Quote from: Phaze on August 04, 2010, 03:56:07 PM
3D has been around for years, why would they suddenly start selling all this 3D crap? It's cool in movies, but watching it all the time at home seems a little nauseating.

Also, can't any tv show 3D? Didn't the Grammy's or something have a 3D Michael Jackson tribute?
It might be for general TV, so that ANYTHING viewed can be 3D.

Still stupid though.
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: jnfs2014 on August 05, 2010, 08:02:14 PM
Eh....I'll just wait until there's hologram televisions. :/
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: PsychoYoshi on August 05, 2010, 11:25:34 PM
Quote from: Phaze on August 04, 2010, 03:56:07 PM
3D has been around for years, why would they suddenly start selling all this 3D crap? It's cool in movies, but watching it all the time at home seems a little nauseating.

Also, can't any tv show 3D? Didn't the Grammy's or something have a 3D Michael Jackson tribute?

The "why" is quite simple. It's proprietary technology that the movie and TV industries wants to schlep off on everyone else because they feel like their form of media is being marginalized (and with the Internet, well, it kinda is).

Companies jump on the bandwagon because they want to take the money of idiot early adopters of new technology.
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: taken to da limit on August 06, 2010, 06:02:33 AM
Apparently, 3D effects are not very good as in quality. Always come out blury n unclear. Plus, you get eye pains from watching too long. I would not want to have Advil next to me every time I watch 3D television. And... Isnt TV blinding enough? :|
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: Tupin on August 06, 2010, 12:53:46 PM
Unrelated, anyone see the Sharp Quattron? It actually adds a lot of color to the picture and makes it look way better. Why aren't they focusing on that instead of this 3D stuff? Comparison with RGB on the left and RGBY on the right:

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_7WERONfpfDw/S0bzz4hCoEI/AAAAAAAAA5M/1odwJTPZFh4/s1600/sharp_quad_pixel_4.jpg)
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: Mystic on August 12, 2010, 11:01:45 AM
Tuppy makes me want a new TV.
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: Rayquarian on August 13, 2010, 04:14:15 PM
Quote from: Tupin on August 06, 2010, 12:53:46 PM
Unrelated, anyone see the Sharp Quattron? It actually adds a lot of color to the picture and makes it look way better. Why aren't they focusing on that instead of this 3D stuff? Comparison with RGB on the left and RGBY on the right:

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_7WERONfpfDw/S0bzz4hCoEI/AAAAAAAAA5M/1odwJTPZFh4/s1600/sharp_quad_pixel_4.jpg)
Because 3D is (allegedly) where all the money is.
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: bluaki on August 14, 2010, 11:58:18 AM
Quote from: Tupin on August 06, 2010, 12:53:46 PM
Unrelated, anyone see the Sharp Quattron? It actually adds a lot of color to the picture and makes it look way better. Why aren't they focusing on that instead of this 3D stuff? Comparison with RGB on the left and RGBY on the right:

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_7WERONfpfDw/S0bzz4hCoEI/AAAAAAAAA5M/1odwJTPZFh4/s1600/sharp_quad_pixel_4.jpg)
Because its advertising is much more dull: phrases like "crisp colors" and "high contrast", which for modern displays I believe are specs just tacked onto every box, and "we finally have yellow"; compared to the fancy appearance 3D has.

I'm not too sure how significant the actual effect is for that kind of screen, either. Camera photographs of screens tend to be inaccurate simulation of how a human eye would perceive the same image, so I feel like the contrast would be much less noticeable in real life. And yellow isn't too popular of a color.
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: Silverhawk79 on August 14, 2010, 01:06:39 PM
Quote from: Tupin on August 06, 2010, 12:53:46 PM
Unrelated, anyone see the Sharp Quattron? It actually adds a lot of color to the picture and makes it look way better. Why aren't they focusing on that instead of this 3D stuff? Comparison with RGB on the left and RGBY on the right:

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_7WERONfpfDw/S0bzz4hCoEI/AAAAAAAAA5M/1odwJTPZFh4/s1600/sharp_quad_pixel_4.jpg)
Now I want to get a new TV, even though we just got this huge one like 4 months ago.
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: Rayquarian on August 14, 2010, 04:29:22 PM
Quote from: bluaki on August 14, 2010, 11:58:18 AM
Because its advertising is much more dull: phrases like "crisp colors" and "high contrast", which for modern displays I believe are specs just tacked onto every box, and "we finally have yellow"; compared to the fancy appearance 3D has.

I'm not too sure how significant the actual effect is for that kind of screen, either. Camera photographs of screens tend to be inaccurate simulation of how a human eye would perceive the same image, so I feel like the contrast would be much less noticeable in real life. And yellow isn't too popular of a color.
Yellow's my favorite color.
Title: Re: Actually saw a 3DTV today.
Post by: Eizweir on August 17, 2010, 03:27:17 PM
Quote from: taken to da limit on August 06, 2010, 06:02:33 AM
Apparently, 3D effects are not very good as in quality. Always come out blury n unclear. Plus, you get eye pains from watching too long. I would not want to have Advil next to me every time I watch 3D television. And... Isnt TV blinding enough? :|
The 3d Tvs that don't require glasses use a special screen with tiny slits that direct a different image to each eye to make it 3D, that being said, you have to sit directly in front of the screen at a perpendicular angle or it will turn out a blurry mess because the images are being directed at a different angle.