Poll
Question:
Do you agree?
Option 1: yes
votes: 7
Option 2: no
votes: 3
Option 3: not sure
votes: 3
Ok, now on the old nsider people always said oot was the best zelda game let me give you some quotes of what they say.......
"Oot was origonal"
"oot revolutionizes the series"
"way better story"
etc
Well honestly mm BUILDS on oot's revolution and has just as good a story.
Heres what I want you to vote on and this is what I think.
If mm came out before Oot most people who are oot fans would say mm is better.
Why? BECAUSE it was just as good as Oot, people were just looking for exuses to keep the origonal the best game, when in fact mm was just as good if not better. People didnt like mm for a few reasons...
1.Time limit(acually made the game harder which some people cant handle)
2.No Ganondorf(wtf youd think they would be tired of this)
3.No master sword(who cares really)
4.No Navi(wtf she was annoying anyways)
5.Barely any triforce reference(so what that doesnt make the game)
Now if mm came out before Oot most of these reasons wouldnt exis.The only one that would remain would be the time limit because a few people still wouldnt like it. So who agrees who disagrees?If you want to flame me BRING IT ON!!!!!
*activates flame sheild*
I agree with you 100% on everything you just said:)
but how would the story work if OOT would be made after MM?
Quote from: MasterSword on October 11, 2007, 12:08:52 PM
I agree with you 100% on everything you just said:)
but how would the story work if OOT would be made after MM?
not really the point lol just pointing it out.
Agree
God darn it. Do you people have any common sense at all? Two-week ban for bumping this thread.
Also, don't whine about how the thread was bumped by posting. Fill out a report. Thanks.