NSFCD

Game-o-rama => Console Gaming => Topic started by: Link2768 on November 19, 2007, 12:43:02 AM

Title: Twilight Princess
Post by: Link2768 on November 19, 2007, 12:43:02 AM
Why was everyone complaining about Twilight Princess ruining the lore? I recently beat it(yes i know months behind) and dont see how it would ruin the Zelda series.  :-\
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: Fell on November 19, 2007, 07:00:48 AM
I know. :-\

I thought it was awesome.

Yet people keep looking at the bad stuff.
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: MasterSword on November 20, 2007, 02:40:55 PM
What can i say, they're all complainers.
I thought the game was awesome, although Zelda didn't play too much of a part in it.
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: Zanryu on November 20, 2007, 06:44:11 PM
Sure, it was a fairly large change to the series, but they were in no way hindrances to the awesomeness. They were great innovations, and the graphics were lovely for a GCN game, and great for Wii. The only problem I have with it is the simplicity of the bosses. There are enough sidequests, they take some time, too. Hell, I'm still missing 12 Poes. The hearts took me a while to find (two days to find them all), and the bugs a few hours. The secret caverns are fun, too.

All in all, this was an amazing game. People who whine about it need to stop looking at the few faults and look at the uncountable pluses to the game. Nothing can be perfect.
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: GrimTuesday on November 20, 2007, 10:20:44 PM
Isn't it ironic that your criticizing us for looking at the bad points, but you are only looking at the good points and not bringing up any bad points?

Many fans thought it was to easy.
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: Ultrasuperstarenator on January 10, 2008, 03:53:54 PM
Quote from: GrimTuesday on November 20, 2007, 10:20:44 PM
Isn't it ironic that your criticizing us for looking at the bad points, but you are only looking at the good points and not bringing up any bad points?

Many fans thought it was to easy.

So? It isn't very fun if it's so hard you want to throw the controller at the screen. Plus, you're really only saying it's too easy CONPARAITVLY. If it was one of the first Legend of Zelda's, everyone would be like, "OMGZ! I don't know what to do!" like NEW PLAYERS!!!!!!
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: Oren on January 11, 2008, 03:43:53 PM
Quote from: Felldohs_wrath on November 19, 2007, 07:00:48 AM
I know. :-\

I thought it was awesome.

Yet people keep looking at the bad stuff.
your right i hate it when people do that.. it was a good game
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: GrimTuesday on January 15, 2008, 11:35:49 PM
Quote from: Ultrasuperstarenator on January 10, 2008, 03:53:54 PM
Quote from: GrimTuesday on November 20, 2007, 10:20:44 PM
Isn't it ironic that your criticizing us for looking at the bad points, but you are only looking at the good points and not bringing up any bad points?

Many fans thought it was to easy.

So? It isn't very fun if it's so hard you want to throw the controller at the screen. Plus, you're really only saying it's too easy CONPARAITVLY. If it was one of the first Legend of Zelda's, everyone would be like, "OMGZ! I don't know what to do!" like NEW PLAYERS!!!!!!

Yes but the puzzles in TP were EASY even if the other games existed, the characters told you what to do and how to do it, they even highlitghted it to make it easier! That is why I still play my GBC I want a real challenge!
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: SkyMyl on January 16, 2008, 09:04:57 AM
I liked it...but *Spoilers* the last bosses 2nd form didn't please me. It just felt...different.
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: Fell on January 16, 2008, 09:19:09 AM
Quote from: MasterYoungLink on January 16, 2008, 09:04:57 AM
I liked it...but *Spoilers* the last bosses 2nd form didn't please me. It just felt...different.

Well it stayed true to what he turns into.

It was easy, but he was cool!  :)
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: Ultrasuperstarenator on January 16, 2008, 11:32:55 AM
Quote from: GrimTuesday on January 15, 2008, 11:35:49 PM
Quote from: Ultrasuperstarenator on January 10, 2008, 03:53:54 PM
Quote from: GrimTuesday on November 20, 2007, 10:20:44 PM
Isn't it ironic that your criticizing us for looking at the bad points, but you are only looking at the good points and not bringing up any bad points?

Many fans thought it was to easy.

So? It isn't very fun if it's so hard you want to throw the controller at the screen. Plus, you're really only saying it's too easy CONPARAITVLY. If it was one of the first Legend of Zelda's, everyone would be like, "OMGZ! I don't know what to do!" like NEW PLAYERS!!!!!!

Yes but the puzzles in TP were EASY even if the other games existed, the characters told you what to do and how to do it, they even highlitghted it to make it easier! That is why I still play my GBC I want a real challenge!


um, you wouldn't think if you saw a rock sticking out of the ground to bomb it, would you?

you wouldn't really think to hit the crystal switches with your items, would you?

These were explained in OoT, but left to figure out in TP. Plus, that there WERE hard puzzles, you twit. What was whole Frecken LAKEBED? It's also kinda cheap difficulty to just not tell the player what to do next. To a certain extent, it's okay, but after finishing a dungeon without ANY pointers isn't fun. OoT and ALTTP's attutude was, ""I can't think of any good puzzles outside the dungeons,, so for difficulty, I'm going to laugh in your face for not noing what to do, Even though there is NO way to KNOW what to DO next!" all you do is stuble around intill you find something. This isn't diffcult. This isn't figuring anything out. This is mindless POKING. Plus, wasn't Majora's Mask tell you where to go and when to do it? Lo and behold, it's harder than all the others.
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: Triforceman22 on January 16, 2008, 06:12:38 PM
This game is great.
I don't care how easy it was, it was still really fun to play,
They should have made the second half of the game longer though....
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: Ultrasuperstarenator on January 17, 2008, 06:47:18 PM
Quote from: Triforceman22 on January 16, 2008, 06:12:38 PM
This game is great.
I don't care how easy it was, it was still really fun to play,
They should have made the second half of the game longer though....

Second half LONGER? how can one half be longer than the other half?

OHHHH . . . okay, you mean after you get the Master Sword?
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: Allegretto on January 17, 2008, 08:12:58 PM
It was a Great Game i liked it more than Wind Waker, But the Bosses were a bit to easy
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: RedYoshi on January 29, 2008, 06:25:37 PM
I liked the game. Many people said it was too much like OoT, but that's what I liked about it. OoT was the #1 game in the NP Awards.
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: Syncopathic on January 29, 2008, 08:13:47 PM
It was a good game, but it was too easy, and the bosses were disappointing, The twilight world people had so much potential...
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: TheTrueLegend on March 23, 2008, 05:04:38 PM
My quarrels with the game include it's relative relation, or to be more accurate lack there of, to Ocarina of Time after being stating numerous times to the contrary, it's focus on traditional elements to the point of overshadowing new elements while at the same time failing to really connect those traditions, and lastly the lack of depth in most of the cast of the game.

To be blunt I felt like it was a game that played upon to many worn Zelda formulas without integrating them and failed to really create a world that was teaming with life that really was a part of the story.  Oh, and that's not OoT 100 years later.  Sorry, it's just too different.  Maybe they moved north.  I don't know.  I really wouldn't have cared if Auonuma hadn't gone out and told us point blank that it was.  Don't say what you can't back up.  I'm really tired of having to have these games to explained to me in press conferences.  If you can't explain it WITH the game there's your problem right there. 
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: Kaz on March 23, 2008, 11:31:40 PM
Quote from: GrimTuesday on November 20, 2007, 10:20:44 PM
Isn't it ironic that your criticizing us for looking at the bad points, but you are only looking at the good points and not bringing up any bad points?

Many fans thought it was to easy.

Honestly though, most Zelda games are too easy anyway, so that shouldn't be an issue with just this one game.

Twilight Princess, in my honest opinion, was considerably more dull than it could have been, but it was a good game overall. I'm not exactly a fan of the character design, bosses, some of the new tools (dominion rod SUCKS BALLS DFLKJ;ALKSDJF), and the weird unnatural brown-yellow lighting.

A lackluster but still enjoyable addition to a series plagued by repetitiveness.
Title: Re: Twilight Princess
Post by: Triforceman22 on March 24, 2008, 12:47:04 PM
Quote from: Ultrasuperstarenator on January 17, 2008, 06:47:18 PM
Quote from: Triforceman22 on January 16, 2008, 06:12:38 PM
This game is great.
I don't care how easy it was, it was still really fun to play,
They should have made the second half of the game longer though....

Second half LONGER? how can one half be longer than the other half?

OHHHH . . . okay, you mean after you get the Master Sword?

duh. :P

the first three area's in the game took the majority of the quest.
Especially with the twilight realm quests.