My complaint about the Nsider forums.

[Macawmoses]

am writing to express my concerns about Rabbi Mario583 and, more specifically, his intimations regarding what I call querulous mythomaniacs. So let's begin, quite properly, with a brief look at the historical development of the problem, of its attempted solutions, and of the eternal argument about it. He whines about birdbrained personæ non gratæ, yet Rabbi Mario583 enthusiastically supports overbearing polluters. A word to the wise: His intent is to prevent us from asking questions. Rabbi Mario583 doesn't want the details checked. He doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts he presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of his "facts" are false.

I won't bore you with the details, but suffice it to say that it strikes me as amusing that Rabbi Mario583 complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! He does nothing but complain.

I feel funny having to tell readers whom I presume are adults that I am weary of listening to Rabbi Mario583 descant on the glories of absolutism. I bring that up solely to emphasize that Rabbi Mario583's subalterns are merely ciphers. Rabbi Mario583 is the one who decides whether or not to toss quaint concepts like decency, fairness, and rational debate out the window. Rabbi Mario583 is the one who gives out the orders to depressurize the frail vessel of human hopes. And Rabbi Mario583 is the one trying to conceal how if five years ago I had described a person like Rabbi Mario583 to you and told you that in five years he'd grasp at straws, trying to find increasingly wishy-washy ways to ascribe opinions to me that I don't even hold, you'd have thought me hectoring. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how the problem of parasitic weasels serves as an excuse for him to express his own hostility and frustrated need for power. Stated differently, if you've read this far then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me.

Is that such a difficult concept? Rabbi Mario583's idiotic claim that sneaky fribbles are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes is just that, an idiotic claim. Rabbi Mario583 represents a new breed of crotchety, abusive numskulls. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: To what depths of depravity does Rabbi Mario583 need to descend before the rest of us realize we must tell it like it is? I don't pretend to know the answer but I do know that if I wanted to brainwash and manipulate a large segment of the population, I would convince them that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. In fact, that's exactly what Rabbi Mario583 does as part of his quest to conspire with evil.

Because of Rabbi Mario583's obsession with denominationalism, he appears to have found a new tool to use to help him make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up. That tool is anti-intellectualism, and if you watch him wield it, you'll unequivocally see why there are some nugatory yahoos who are caustic. There are also some who are insensitive. Which category does Rabbi Mario583 fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both". The basal lie that underlies all of Rabbi Mario583's indelicate bruta fulmina is that plagiarism is absolutely essential to the well-being of society. Translation: Principles don't matter. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views but you should nevertheless be aware that Rabbi Mario583 has announced his intentions to block streets and traffic to the extent that ambulances can't get through. While doing so may earn Rabbi Mario583 a gold star from the mush-for-brains frotteurism crowd, some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that I am declaring open season on soulless wankers like him who exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in managing both the news and the entertainment that gets presented to us. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation. In closing, please remember that my ultimate goal is to examine the warp and woof of Rabbi Mario583's witticisms. If I advance, follow me. If I stop, urge me on. If I retreat, kill me.



Yes, im calling you rabbi :|

[Sorasnobody]

In a prior letter, I identified a set of ideological premises as superordinate constructions that maintain the rhetorical context in which Miss Mackormoses is able to recover the dead past by annihilating the living present. I will now elaborate on three of her most impertinent premises:

   1. She knows 100% of everything 100% of the time.
   2. Free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing her and the insincere ruffians in her coterie.
   3. She is a refined lady with the soundest education and morals you can imagine.

And that's why I feel compelled to say something about vulgar, hotheaded jerks. Whenever she tries to harm others or even instill the fear of harm, so do footling pinheads. Similarly, whenever she attempts to create widespread hysteria, self-centered wankers typically attempt the same. I do not seek to draw any causal scheme from these correlations. I mention them only because if I want to lose my temper, that should be my prerogative. I don't need her forcing me to.

Mackormoses doesn't have any principles, or if she does, she puts them aside whenever they're inconvenient. She says she's not psychotic but she's undeniably impolitic and that's essentially the same thing. I have a hard time trying to reason with people who remain calm when they see Mackormoses break down traditional values. How dare she lead to the destruction of the human race? From a purely technical point of view, difficult times lie ahead. Fortunately, we have the capacity to circumvent much of the impending misery by working together to compare, contrast, and identify the connections among different sorts of spleeny sectarianism. Easy as it may seem to remind Mackormoses about the concept of truth in advertising, it is far more difficult to provide you with vital information which Mackormoses has gone to great lengths to prevent you from discovering.

We can say that Mackormoses favors the idea of a country based on perquisites and privileges, and Mackormoses can claim the opposite, and it won't make one bit of difference. Wouldn't it be wonderful if we lived in a world without hypocritical, deceitful flakes? While she has a right to her opinion, I stand by what I've written before, that she always cavils at my attempts to report as best as possible the facts and circumstances surrounding her squalid, malignant comments. That's probably because it is a dangerous folly to ignore the threat to democracy posed by snippy slackers. To say anything else would be a lie. I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because on several occasions I have heard Mackormoses state that clericalism forms the core of any utopian society. I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a comment. What I consider far more important though is that if we don't address the legitimate anger, fear, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by Mackormoses because they saw no other options for change, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that Mackormoses looks primarily at a person's superficial qualities such as physiognomy and mannerisms. I, in contrast, consider how likely a person is to break the spell of great expectations that now binds the most pathetic ideologues you'll ever see to Mackormoses. That's what's important to me. Either way, she is out to shake belief in all existing institutions through the systematic perversion of both contemporary and historical facts. And when we play her game, we become accomplices. Why am I furious? Because Mackormoses's philosophies should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that Mackormoses's apothegms are intended to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools." And why am I embarrassed? Because if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will obviously find that Mackormoses and her pals are insipid, stinking reprobates. This is not set down in complaint against them, but merely as analysis.

Mackormoses's causing all sorts of problems for us. We must grasp these problems with both hands and deal with them in a forthright way. In case you have any doubts, I frequently wish to tell Mackormoses that I wish bookish, vainglorious hostes generis humani had the gumption not to silence anyone whom she considers amateurish. But being a generally genteel person, however, I always bite my tongue. She just reported that she does the things she does "for the children". Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on Mackormoses's part? I don't. I think that it's a deliberate attempt to instill a general ennui.

Mackormoses's bad enough when she's alone but she's even worse when she's joined by morally crippled sideshow barkers. Mackormoses refers to a variety of things using the word "anthropoteleological". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, she's saying that we can stop antiheroism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for sinister, brainless geeks, which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, her allies don't really care that the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. So, sorry for being so long-winded in this letter, but you don't need a preschool diploma to understand that Miss Mackormoses's certainly speaking through her hat when she says that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to cater to the basest instincts of ultra-deluded phonies.



Table turn!

[Macawmoses]

Yes, Miss I am :)

[Sorasnobody]

Yes, Miss I am :)

Indeed, you are. Lol, I'm going to do this on NSider 2.

[Syncopathic]

Yes, Miss I am :)

Indeed, you are. Lol, I'm going to do this on NSider 2.

the idiots wont understand a single word.

[えっちーせんぱい]

All of you shut the hell up.

[Mario583]

All of you shut the hell up.

OH U!

[…]

Wow this was taken completely different here.

[Matt]

Lol i read the first couple of sentences, and all im gonna say is quit crying. Next time make it short and simple :|

[Shujinco2]

Lol i read the first couple of sentences, and all im gonna say is quit crying. Next time make it short and simple :|

Yes please!

And as puniushment for making it EXCRUCIATINGLY long:

[yes.derek]

All of you shut the hell up.

OH U!

^tl;dr

[JMV]

Stop with the complaint generator.