News:

<Clu> no nsfcd is basically a ghost town, it should be killed behind fences

Main Menu

We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things...

Started by Tupin, July 16, 2009, 07:49:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kilroy

Quote from: Mutilator<Seven> on July 18, 2009, 10:25:38 AM
Can't we harvest moon rocks or something, there has to be something of value on the moon.
Moon rocks are intercourse ing rocks. There's nothing different about them.
1984 WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN INSTRUCTION NOT MANUAL
"yes you are anusface, but i am better than!!" - taw, steam forums
 FOR NSF MASCOT

Flying Chickens

Quote from: Kilroy has a cheap suit on July 18, 2009, 11:18:57 AM
Moon rocks are intercourse ing rocks. There's nothing different about them.
They're made of moon! D:

Interestingly enough, I was listening to a radio show with someone interviewing people about travelling to the moon and such.

Friendly Hostile

Quote from: HTA on July 17, 2009, 09:58:50 PM
Oh, and FH, it seems odd that an agnostic (or atheist, not sure which you are if either, and if you are religious I apologize) to believe that some day we will discover some amazing technology that will redefine physics even though all evidence points to the contrary. Don't you make assumptions and theories from facts? Isn't that why religion is so bad, because people who are religious make similar theories based on no factual evidence?

I prefer to stick with what we know as the truth when we are speaking about science.

Since you feel the need to cram words down my intercourse ing throat, let's get something straight:

I never said it will happen, I never said I believed that it will.  What I said was that science does change and even some of our scientific fundamentals are capable of someday being proven false given that the right discoveries are made to disprove them.  It's how the gosh darn scientific theory works.  I don't believe in any gods for one simple reason:  there is absolutely no scientific evidence to completely prove their existence.  If science was able to prove, without a doubt, that any god existed, I would accept then that a god of some form exists.  But current science points heavily to pretty much all of the theistic religions to being wrong or just making poop up.  Which is why I refuse to believe any god exists.

However, I never, ever, rule out what humanity is able to learn and discover.  I never treat any thing studied in science as this is forever true and will always be true forever and ever and ever and ever.  Because guess what: poop changes.  All the intercourse ing time.  Which is something religion really really doesn't get.  Religions are based on traditions and old beliefs, which is something that leaves little room for change, and change that does occur requires massive amounts of effort and arguing and debating.  The scientific community does rely on treating its discoveries as fact and truth.  The glory behind it though is that the scientific community admits it's wrong and changes how it views thing when new information and technology comes to light.

So for the tl;dr

I'm leaving open the possibility that we will find a way to travel great distances, since science changes all the intercourse ing time.  However, unlike religion, I don't treat these theories as truth or fact, only a possibility.  Also HTA better learn to intercourse ing keep discussion of atheism and religion out of topics that have absolutely no intercourse ing connection to them because I am so darn tired of every post about anything leading to this gosh darn discussion.  Religionfags and athiestfags just shut the intercourse  up already.