There was no Capcom in Brawl because of this...

[Tupin]

http://kotaku.com/351377/why-is-there-no-capcom-in-super-smash-bros-brawl

Apparently, Nintendo was mad at Capcom for porting over Resident Evil 4 from the GCN to the PS2.

So they put no one from Capcom in the game.

What do you think of this?

Well I think that with this and the problems licensing Goldeneye 007, Nintendo seriously needs to work on their relationship with companies besides Sega and Konami.

[La Pared]

hehe i just finished reading this over at N2. well if this is the case it was a bad move by Nintendo not to include a capcom character like Megaman.

[Macawmoses]

hehe i just finished reading this over at N2. well if this is the case it was a bad move by Nintendo not to include a capcom character like Megaman.

How so? THEY were the ones that begged, and they are the ones struggling atm,  I feel it is karma, and that Capcom DID NOT deserve a rep*I have said this before*

[Jono2]

if capcom hadn't kept porting nintendo exclusive titles to other consoles, they would have had a good chance at a rep.

Two big selling titles, Tales of Symphonia and Resident Evil 4 were both ported to the PS2.  I'm glad that nintendo wasn't blind, letting capcom characters be involved in the game.

[Macawmoses]

if capcom hadn't kept porting nintendo exclusive titles to other consoles, they would have had a good chance at a rep.

Two big selling titles, Tales of Symphonia and Resident Evil 4 were both ported to the PS2.  I'm glad that nintendo wasn't blind, letting capcom characters be involved in the game.

100% agree

[Avion-Finch]

Yeah, I lost alot of faith in Capcom, when they got rid of Treasure.......then all the porting.....then they ask for an honor like this?

[Fell]

Well, Capcom got their just desserts.

;)

Well, they still could've added RAYMAN.  >:(

[Tupin]

Well, Capcom got their just desserts.

;)

Well, they still could've added RAYMAN.  >:(

Ubisoft owns Rayman.

[Fell]

Well, Capcom got their just desserts.

;)

Well, they still could've added RAYMAN.  >:(

Ubisoft owns Rayman.

Just like capcom owns megaman. They could've asked ubisoft. ::)

I mean, Rayman is on every nintendo console since the 64.

[TheKoopaBros.]

if capcom hadn't kept porting nintendo exclusive titles to other consoles, they would have had a good chance at a rep.

Two big selling titles, Tales of Symphonia and Resident Evil 4 were both ported to the PS2.  I'm glad that nintendo wasn't blind, letting capcom characters be involved in the game.

That's pretty much my thoughts on the subject as well. Its common knowledge that porting exclusives to other systems isn't exactly a gesture of kindness. I don't have much problem with Capcom's games aside from the porting issues, they're still one of my favourite publishers really.

[La Pared]

Well this title was made for the fans. Nintendo shud of just put away their differences with them and allowed a capcom character for Us the fans. but w/e everyone has their own opinions on this stuff.

[Mutilator7]

Well this title was made for the fans. Nintendo shud of just put away their differences with them and allowed a capcom character for Us the fans. but w/e everyone has their own opinions on this stuff.

Yeah, in the end it's not about the fans..