Main Menu

Opinions on an Animal Crossing Character

Started by Java, January 03, 2008, 12:12:41 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Nayrman

Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...

Apollo

Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
i completely agree, but im sure they will add the animal crosser.
they added smashville, which i love.
It had no real name, but they created it and named it so im betting thats what they do for the character too.

Rius

Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
But in the games, there are no set playables. Sakurai could have named him Red, but that's not represenative of the series idea.

Nayrman

Quote from: Apollo on January 04, 2008, 11:01:56 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
i completely agree, but im sure they will add the animal crosser.
they added smashville, which i love.
It had no real name, but they created it and named it so im betting thats what they do for the character too.
Well, they also have a generic FE stage, so I guess thats just something thats going to happen in this game, but it slightly irks me. Oh well, I guess I just won't use him then. No biggie. I got Sonic so I'm happy.

Nayrman

Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:03:48 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
But in the games, there are no set playables. Sakurai could have named him Red, but that's not represenative of the series idea.
Gym leaders, elite four, etc. IMO much more interesting than the generic trainer. Doesn't feel like it's from the game itself to me.

Apollo

Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:05:03 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:03:48 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
But in the games, there are no set playables. Sakurai could have named him Red, but that's not represenative of the series idea.
Gym leaders, elite four, etc. IMO much more interesting than the generic trainer. Doesn't feel like it's from the game itself to me.
yeah but maybe the different colors or styles will have different costumes from throughout the pokemon series.

Nayrman

Quote from: Apollo on January 04, 2008, 11:06:51 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:05:03 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:03:48 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
But in the games, there are no set playables. Sakurai could have named him Red, but that's not represenative of the series idea.
Gym leaders, elite four, etc. IMO much more interesting than the generic trainer. Doesn't feel like it's from the game itself to me.
yeah but maybe the different colors or styles will have different costumes from throughout the pokemon series.
Maybe, but I dunno. The only one to have a "costume" is Wario. But I'd love to see shiney pkmn, female trainer, and at least one gym leader. I've always wanted to be a gym leader...similar to the job like system in FF where you can be certain things rather than the up and coming trainer.

Rius

Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:05:03 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:03:48 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
But in the games, there are no set playables. Sakurai could have named him Red, but that's not represenative of the series idea.
Gym leaders, elite four, etc. IMO much more interesting than the generic trainer. Doesn't feel like it's from the game itself to me.
Gym leaders aren't as important to the story as the generic trainer though; I think the only notable that could be playable is Blue, and that's because he's a generic Champion.

Nayrman

Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:15:13 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:05:03 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:03:48 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
But in the games, there are no set playables. Sakurai could have named him Red, but that's not represenative of the series idea.
Gym leaders, elite four, etc. IMO much more interesting than the generic trainer. Doesn't feel like it's from the game itself to me.
Gym leaders aren't as important to the story as the generic trainer though; I think the only notable that could be playable is Blue, and that's because he's a generic Champion.
Or the generic guy from Mt. Silver in G/S/C...a.k.a. unofficial Ash. That would work wouldn't it?

Apollo

Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:16:07 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:15:13 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:05:03 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:03:48 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
But in the games, there are no set playables. Sakurai could have named him Red, but that's not represenative of the series idea.
Gym leaders, elite four, etc. IMO much more interesting than the generic trainer. Doesn't feel like it's from the game itself to me.
Gym leaders aren't as important to the story as the generic trainer though; I think the only notable that could be playable is Blue, and that's because he's a generic Champion.
Or the generic guy from Mt. Silver in G/S/C...a.k.a. unofficial Ash. That would work wouldn't it?
yeah shinies would be awesome.
do you think it would funny and cool if you could play as prof oak? lol

Rius

Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:16:07 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:15:13 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:05:03 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:03:48 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
But in the games, there are no set playables. Sakurai could have named him Red, but that's not represenative of the series idea.
Gym leaders, elite four, etc. IMO much more interesting than the generic trainer. Doesn't feel like it's from the game itself to me.
Gym leaders aren't as important to the story as the generic trainer though; I think the only notable that could be playable is Blue, and that's because he's a generic Champion.
Or the generic guy from Mt. Silver in G/S/C...a.k.a. unofficial Ash. That would work wouldn't it?
Umm, he's the trainer confirmed. :P

Apollo

Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:19:36 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:16:07 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:15:13 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:05:03 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:03:48 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
But in the games, there are no set playables. Sakurai could have named him Red, but that's not represenative of the series idea.
Gym leaders, elite four, etc. IMO much more interesting than the generic trainer. Doesn't feel like it's from the game itself to me.
Gym leaders aren't as important to the story as the generic trainer though; I think the only notable that could be playable is Blue, and that's because he's a generic Champion.
Or the generic guy from Mt. Silver in G/S/C...a.k.a. unofficial Ash. That would work wouldn't it?
Umm, he's the trainer confirmed. :P
no not the same one. ash was the character in red, blue, and yellow. ash was also a boss in gold and silver.

Nayrman

Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:19:36 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:16:07 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:15:13 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:05:03 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:03:48 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
But in the games, there are no set playables. Sakurai could have named him Red, but that's not represenative of the series idea.
Gym leaders, elite four, etc. IMO much more interesting than the generic trainer. Doesn't feel like it's from the game itself to me.
Gym leaders aren't as important to the story as the generic trainer though; I think the only notable that could be playable is Blue, and that's because he's a generic Champion.
Or the generic guy from Mt. Silver in G/S/C...a.k.a. unofficial Ash. That would work wouldn't it?
Umm, he's the trainer confirmed. :P
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9acbPU4wYJw

I mean him...the only time they actually make him an actual character

Rius

Quote from: Apollo on January 04, 2008, 11:21:22 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:19:36 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:16:07 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:15:13 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:05:03 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:03:48 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
But in the games, there are no set playables. Sakurai could have named him Red, but that's not represenative of the series idea.
Gym leaders, elite four, etc. IMO much more interesting than the generic trainer. Doesn't feel like it's from the game itself to me.
Gym leaders aren't as important to the story as the generic trainer though; I think the only notable that could be playable is Blue, and that's because he's a generic Champion.
Or the generic guy from Mt. Silver in G/S/C...a.k.a. unofficial Ash. That would work wouldn't it?
Umm, he's the trainer confirmed. :P
no not the same one. ash was the character in red, blue, and yellow. ash was also a boss in gold and silver.
Yeah, the same one. GS is the sequal to RB, which is why Blue succeeds Giovanni as Viridian Leader and Red gives up his champion status for personal training. They just gave him the default name.

DededeCloneChris

Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:25:23 AM
Quote from: Apollo on January 04, 2008, 11:21:22 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:19:36 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:16:07 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:15:13 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 11:05:03 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on January 04, 2008, 11:03:48 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on January 04, 2008, 10:59:15 AM
Personally, I don't overly care if they do get one or not, but if they do, I want Tom Nook for two reasons
1. All other characters are far too minor (and KK isn't an event only circumstance, so I don't think he can be in)
2. "Animal Crosser" or the generic avatar is just that, generic. Main reason I don't like the PKMN trainer itself (I love the three in one tho). Personally, I think they should've made it "Ash" because he's an actual character rather than a random no name avatar. I dunno, it's just me but I don't like blank avatars in fighting games. I know there is a rumor about him/her but w/e...
But in the games, there are no set playables. Sakurai could have named him Red, but that's not represenative of the series idea.
Gym leaders, elite four, etc. IMO much more interesting than the generic trainer. Doesn't feel like it's from the game itself to me.
Gym leaders aren't as important to the story as the generic trainer though; I think the only notable that could be playable is Blue, and that's because he's a generic Champion.
Or the generic guy from Mt. Silver in G/S/C...a.k.a. unofficial Ash. That would work wouldn't it?
Umm, he's the trainer confirmed. :P
no not the same one. ash was the character in red, blue, and yellow. ash was also a boss in gold and silver.
Yeah, the same one. GS is the sequal to RB, which is why Blue succeeds Giovanni as Viridian Leader and Red gives up his champion status for personal training. They just gave him the default name.
I need to think better of an idea.

BTW NINNIN6, you will like to see my porfile! ;)