News:

<+Clu> Silverhawk79 is just wrong for me

Main Menu

An Interesting Discovery

Started by Light, January 03, 2008, 01:08:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Light

I have just noticed something. All of the veterans that have been announced as being in Brawl are not unlockable in Melee. Meaning; you have all of them without having to do anything (minus pressing the power button and a few buttons). Perhaps unlockable characters in the past will remain hidden until the release date?

Discuss.
Holy crap all my sigs were always poop. Best leave this space alone.

Triforce_Luigi

Quote from: LightningSword on January 03, 2008, 01:08:11 PM
I have just noticed something. All of the veterans that have been announced as being in Brawl are not unlockable in Melee. Meaning; you have all of them without having to do anything (minus pressing the power button and a few buttons). Perhaps unlockable characters in the past will remain hidden until the release date?

Discuss.

Ooh, intelligence. :P

Anyway, I think it seems like a very likely possibility.

tollhouse2006

I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
Friend Code: 2622-1690-4267  Finally have wifi

Qsmash

Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
and one of them might not come back. :(

Water ☮

Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
3 if you count shiek

Cornwad

Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:24:56 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
3 if you count shiek

4 if you count Jigglypuff

Qsmash

Quote from: Cornwad on January 03, 2008, 01:27:37 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:24:56 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
3 if you count shiek

4 if you count Jigglypuff
Jigglypuff was unlockable.-_-'

Cornwad

Quote from: QSMASHBRO on January 03, 2008, 01:31:45 PM
Quote from: Cornwad on January 03, 2008, 01:27:37 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:24:56 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
3 if you count shiek

4 if you count Jigglypuff
Jigglypuff was unlockable.-_-'
But if you counted her as a starter, it makes four...

Water ☮

Quote from: Cornwad on January 03, 2008, 01:33:43 PM
Quote from: QSMASHBRO on January 03, 2008, 01:31:45 PM
Quote from: Cornwad on January 03, 2008, 01:27:37 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:24:56 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
3 if you count shiek

4 if you count Jigglypuff
Jigglypuff was unlockable.-_-'
But if you counted her as a starter, it makes four...
Why would you 0_0?

tollhouse2006

Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:24:56 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
3 if you count shiek
Shiek is in Brawl.  One of the character designers working on the project mentioned they we were designing Shiek and Ganondorf in an interview published in Game informer magazine.

Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:39:00 PM
Quote from: Cornwad on January 03, 2008, 01:33:43 PM
Quote from: QSMASHBRO on January 03, 2008, 01:31:45 PM
Quote from: Cornwad on January 03, 2008, 01:27:37 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:24:56 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
3 if you count shiek

4 if you count Jigglypuff
Jigglypuff was unlockable.-_-'
But if you counted her as a starter, it makes four...
Why would you 0_0?
Well if you count the other 9 veterans you have 13.  (Sarcasm)  Seriously, why count hidden characters? 
Friend Code: 2622-1690-4267  Finally have wifi

Water ☮

Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:49:01 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:24:56 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
3 if you count shiek
Shiek is in Brawl.  One of the character designers working on the project mentioned they we were designing Shiek and Ganondorf in an interview published in Game informer magazine.

Doesn't mean they're playable. they could be ATs.

tollhouse2006

Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:53:00 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:49:01 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:24:56 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
3 if you count shiek
Shiek is in Brawl.  One of the character designers working on the project mentioned they we were designing Shiek and Ganondorf in an interview published in Game informer magazine.

Doesn't mean they're playable. they could be ATs.
I strongly dought that would happen.  They would have said something if they were items.
Friend Code: 2622-1690-4267  Finally have wifi

Water ☮

Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:56:19 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:53:00 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:49:01 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:24:56 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
3 if you count shiek
Shiek is in Brawl.  One of the character designers working on the project mentioned they we were designing Shiek and Ganondorf in an interview published in Game informer magazine.

Doesn't mean they're playable. they could be ATs.
I strongly dought that would happen.  They would have said something if they were items.
I also doubt that would happen but its a possibility. why would they say they were items? they didn't say they were playable

tollhouse2006

Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 02:00:20 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:56:19 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:53:00 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:49:01 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:24:56 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
3 if you count shiek
Shiek is in Brawl.  One of the character designers working on the project mentioned they we were designing Shiek and Ganondorf in an interview published in Game informer magazine.

Doesn't mean they're playable. they could be ATs.
I strongly dought that would happen.  They would have said something if they were items.
I also doubt that would happen but its a possibility. why would they say they were items? they didn't say they were playable
Can we please just say they are playable?  You always should go with the best possibility and stay with it.  You can't make the villian of Zelda an AT especially after Twilight Princess's success and making Shiek an AT isn't logical.
Friend Code: 2622-1690-4267  Finally have wifi

Water ☮

Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 02:13:57 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 02:00:20 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:56:19 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:53:00 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:49:01 PM
Quote from: WaterGod on January 03, 2008, 01:24:56 PM
Quote from: tollhouse2006 on January 03, 2008, 01:18:33 PM
I agree, but we are still 2 veterans short of the starters from melee. 
3 if you count shiek
Shiek is in Brawl.  One of the character designers working on the project mentioned they we were designing Shiek and Ganondorf in an interview published in Game informer magazine.

Doesn't mean they're playable. they could be ATs.
I strongly dought that would happen.  They would have said something if they were items.
I also doubt that would happen but its a possibility. why would they say they were items? they didn't say they were playable
Can we please just say they are playable?  You always should go with the best possibility and stay with it.  You can't make the villian of Zelda an AT especially after Twilight Princess's success and making Shiek an AT isn't logical.
sorry i guess i was being kinda pessimistic ;D