Main Menu

What Could've Been Cool For Wi-Fi.

Started by JrDude, April 16, 2008, 05:50:13 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Java

Quote from: JrDude on April 16, 2008, 08:55:03 PM
Quote from: PLAYAT on April 16, 2008, 08:35:16 PM
Voice chat for the "With Friends" mode

That has nothign to do with the topic and it will doubtfully every happen, especially on Nintendo.
*Points to the Nintendo DS Headset*

That would have been such an awesome addition.

Oh and how about a "With Anyone" mode that works for EVERYONE.

There were so many little things that really could have improved Wi-Fi.

Apollo

Quote from: JrDude on April 16, 2008, 05:50:13 PM
Rotation.
Get a bunch of people in fights and rotate from winner/loser to the next person/people. The people waiting can be spectating and winning/losing coins and stickers, while the fighters... fight, duh :P.

Apparently, you didn't "think of everything" Sakurai.
yeah team tournies wouldve been good too

SkyMyl

Here's a list:

Names in with anyone
Special challenges for Wi-Fi only
A Tourney for Wi-Fi, that way we can actually do tournaments on the forums easier and faster.
A Target Test for Wi-Fi.
Lastly, a secret stage or character you could only get with Wi-Fi only that hasn't been in a Smash game before (Jigglypuff is four times harder to unlock now.)

X_Hero

What would've been cool is if you were able to play SSE co-op over Wi-Fi and added challenges in it that only two players would be able to do. That would've been awesome.

Shaleblade

Quote from: JrDude on April 17, 2008, 04:44:35 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 17, 2008, 04:34:20 PM
He may have, and figured that there'd be way too much lag :).
How would that add more lag?
I was referring to rotation.
Imagine 10 players watching a Live 4p battle.
If ONE has a bad connection, the entire thing's screwed.

JrDude

Quote from: Shaleblade on April 19, 2008, 03:21:39 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 17, 2008, 04:44:35 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 17, 2008, 04:34:20 PM
He may have, and figured that there'd be way too much lag :).
How would that add more lag?
I was referring to rotation.
Imagine 10 players watching a Live 4p battle.
If ONE has a bad connection, the entire thing's screwed.
A person watching adds no lag.
[move][/move]
Dude .

Shaleblade

Quote from: JrDude on April 19, 2008, 05:06:18 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 19, 2008, 03:21:39 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 17, 2008, 04:44:35 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 17, 2008, 04:34:20 PM
He may have, and figured that there'd be way too much lag :).
How would that add more lag?
I was referring to rotation.
Imagine 10 players watching a Live 4p battle.
If ONE has a bad connection, the entire thing's screwed.
A person watching adds no lag.
Hmm. Really?

Triforce_Luigi

Quote from: Shaleblade on April 19, 2008, 07:41:31 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 19, 2008, 05:06:18 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 19, 2008, 03:21:39 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 17, 2008, 04:44:35 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 17, 2008, 04:34:20 PM
He may have, and figured that there'd be way too much lag :).
How would that add more lag?
I was referring to rotation.
Imagine 10 players watching a Live 4p battle.
If ONE has a bad connection, the entire thing's screwed.
A person watching adds no lag.
Hmm. Really?
If a spectator did, then Spectator Mode would be a terrible idea.

Shaleblade

Quote from: Triforce_Luigi on April 19, 2008, 08:04:18 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 19, 2008, 07:41:31 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 19, 2008, 05:06:18 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 19, 2008, 03:21:39 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 17, 2008, 04:44:35 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 17, 2008, 04:34:20 PM
He may have, and figured that there'd be way too much lag :).
How would that add more lag?
I was referring to rotation.
Imagine 10 players watching a Live 4p battle.
If ONE has a bad connection, the entire thing's screwed.
A person watching adds no lag.
Hmm. Really?
If a spectator did, then Spectator Mode would be a terrible idea.
*facepalm* Spectatior mode isn't watching a live battle. Spectator mode lets you see a REPLAY of a recently played battle on Wifi.

JrDude

#24
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 20, 2008, 08:33:22 AM
Quote from: Triforce_Luigi on April 19, 2008, 08:04:18 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 19, 2008, 07:41:31 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 19, 2008, 05:06:18 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 19, 2008, 03:21:39 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 17, 2008, 04:44:35 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 17, 2008, 04:34:20 PM
He may have, and figured that there'd be way too much lag :).
How would that add more lag?
I was referring to rotation.
Imagine 10 players watching a Live 4p battle.
If ONE has a bad connection, the entire thing's screwed.
A person watching adds no lag.
Hmm. Really?
If a spectator did, then Spectator Mode would be a terrible idea.
*facepalm* Spectatior mode isn't watching a live battle. Spectator mode lets you see a REPLAY of a recently played battle on Wifi.
No it isn't, it's a real battle happening at the momment you watch it.
[move][/move]
Dude .

Java

Quote from: JrDude on April 20, 2008, 02:20:46 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 20, 2008, 08:33:22 AM
Quote from: Triforce_Luigi on April 19, 2008, 08:04:18 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 19, 2008, 07:41:31 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 19, 2008, 05:06:18 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 19, 2008, 03:21:39 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 17, 2008, 04:44:35 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 17, 2008, 04:34:20 PM
He may have, and figured that there'd be way too much lag :).
How would that add more lag?
I was referring to rotation.
Imagine 10 players watching a Live 4p battle.
If ONE has a bad connection, the entire thing's screwed.
A person watching adds no lag.
Hmm. Really?
If a spectator did, then Spectator Mode would be a terrible idea.
*facepalm* Spectatior mode isn't watching a live battle. Spectator mode lets you see a REPLAY of a recently played battle on Wifi.
No it isn't, it's a real battle happening at the momment you watch it.
You sure about that?

JrDude

Quote from: Java_Java on April 20, 2008, 02:39:58 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 20, 2008, 02:20:46 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 20, 2008, 08:33:22 AM
Quote from: Triforce_Luigi on April 19, 2008, 08:04:18 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 19, 2008, 07:41:31 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 19, 2008, 05:06:18 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 19, 2008, 03:21:39 PM
Quote from: JrDude on April 17, 2008, 04:44:35 PM
Quote from: Shaleblade on April 17, 2008, 04:34:20 PM
He may have, and figured that there'd be way too much lag :).
How would that add more lag?
I was referring to rotation.
Imagine 10 players watching a Live 4p battle.
If ONE has a bad connection, the entire thing's screwed.
A person watching adds no lag.
Hmm. Really?
If a spectator did, then Spectator Mode would be a terrible idea.
*facepalm* Spectatior mode isn't watching a live battle. Spectator mode lets you see a REPLAY of a recently played battle on Wifi.
No it isn't, it's a real battle happening at the momment you watch it.
You sure about that?
Yes, because I've seen the screen where it starts as just 2 players, then it adds another or 2, I've also had some matches cut off.
[move][/move]
Dude .