Main Menu

A Question For Guys.

Started by JrDude, May 10, 2008, 10:19:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Super

What if you were shot in the balls?

ME86

Hm, either I die before reaching my desired age or I die after surpassing my desired age without my testicles? Well, quite simply put, I'd probably pick the later, it's not like they're doing any good as is.


And Bluaki, big shocker there.

LinkXLR

Shot on Spot. I want kids if I'm living forever.

That's me. :D ^


Also, join the Steam Nsider group for maximum fun.
Steam ID: KarthXLR

Gwen Khan


Allegretto


Kilroy

Wait a minute.

Define "balls"

Balls as in just testicles, or are we including the penis here too?
1984 WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN INSTRUCTION NOT MANUAL
"yes you are anusface, but i am better than!!" - taw, steam forums
 FOR NSF MASCOT

SkyMyl

I wouldn't want to live for more than 100 years. That's my fear.

Shoot me.

Lotos

Shot if it meant death on the spot as well.

Hero_Of_Time1

Depends on the life I will live and how many kids I have at that time.. But hmmmm.. Depends. People get their balls snip all the time..

Miiman56


Qsmash

It's impossible to live without balls. You'd be alive but still...

sonicdude164


jnfs2014

Quote from: JrDude on May 10, 2008, 10:19:09 PM
Would you rather be shot on the spot, or have your balls cut off on the spot and guaranteed(SP?) to live for 100 more years?
Depends on who guaranteed me and how much it would hurt.
Rather than that, <<<

Kaz

Why the intercourse  would I want to live until I'm 119? Even if my balls weren't cut off I'd still decline that second option.

Good lord just shoot me.
Quote<+Mithos> My mom grounded me for being gay.

bluaki

#29
Quote from: JrDude on May 10, 2008, 10:49:13 PM
Quote from: bluaki on May 10, 2008, 10:47:31 PM
Quote from: JrDude on May 10, 2008, 10:19:09 PM
guaranteed(SP?) to live for 100 more years
What if I try to commit suicide? Would I be unable to until that 100 years is up?
You'd fail.
So basicly you can become invincible.
I'd become invincible?
So, I wouldn't age excessively in that timeframe either? I'd live a heathy, infertile life until that 100 years is over?
If not, it's definately not worth having to live another 100 years. If so, it might be worth having to live another 100 years for a healthy, less masculine life.

Doesn't it ruin the point of the thread that the second option has two downsides to most people? You could make choice either be between having balls cut off and dying or between dying and having to live another 100 years, both would be more interesting.