wat ya think of orcarina of time

[Silverhawk79]

9.7, whole game was amazing except for the obnoxious Water Temple.

[guido123]

i agree with thunderhero the combat was slow and the insides of houses had the worst graphics ever

[X-3]

Ugh, I need to think a bit more before voting. Stupid X-3.

Anyway, I found the game average at best. It is far from my favorite game. Still, it's pretty fun at some parts.

So...I'd give it a 7 or so.

[guido123]

im still debateing on 8 or 9

[Nayrman]

i agree with thunderhero the combat was slow and the insides of houses had the worst graphics ever

I normall give ppl their own opinions (cept ThunderHero...lol), but these two I have to complain about.
Slow combat? Have you played any RPG from that time? Attack. Wait Turn. Get hit. Wait Turn. Ugh...those were bad X_X;;
Also, I hate the graphics complaint for old games. Yes, the graphics suck now, but for 1998 they were pretty darn good...

Everything else you've said in this thread is pretty okay...

[X-3]

i agree with thunderhero the combat was slow and the insides of houses had the worst graphics ever

I normall give ppl their own opinions (cept ThunderHero...lol), but these two I have to complain about.
Slow combat? Have you played any RPG from that time? Attack. Wait Turn. Get hit. Wait Turn. Ugh...those were bad X_X;;
Also, I hate the graphics complaint for old games. Yes, the graphics suck now, but for 1998 they were pretty darn good...

Everything else you've said in this thread is pretty okay...

FFIV and other Final Fantasies had the ATB system, which made things faster. Still slow, but a bit faster.
Though, I think OoT's combat was pretty good for it's time.

And yes, back then the graphics were pretty good. They're better than Blockio in Mario 64...