Rank Elections Phase 3

[Macawmoses]

[bg-color=white]That batch is to choose your favorite of the ranks.

Now, to enlighten you to a few things:

-The users wanted a total rank overhaul.
-Most users wanted more selectable ranks. (This is remedied by constantly adding the highest post based rank - maybe former staff ranks could be there as well? Hmmm...)
-Users DID NOT want arcade related games.
-Users wanted pips of sorts. Will be done.
-Blue is by far the most popular color.[/bg-color]

[bg-color=#9932CC]RANK DETAILS:

Stragg - comes from HHGttG
Diagnotician - comes from House
Commanding Officer - Advance Wars
Great Lord - Fire Emblem
The Guy - I want to be the guy
Weeaboo - all of you :O
Primid - Brawl
Fawful - Mario and Luigi series
Ace Attorney - ie. Phoenix Wright
The Rawk - Paper Mario (Rawk hawk)
Ace of Spades - in Lemmy Kilmeisters voice
King of All Cosmos - Katamari Damacy[/bg-color]

[bg-color=#66CD00]OTHER POLL QUESTIONS (ANSWER BY REPLYING)

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke?
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul?
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status?
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be?

POLL ENDS IN 3 DAYS[/bg-color]

[Doodle]

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? No.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Yes.
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes.
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Primid, I guess.

[Friendly Hostile]

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke?

Yes

2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul?

Yes

3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status?

Don't care, so no.

4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be?

Weeaboo

[Rayquarian]

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? Yes
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Yes
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Out of those...Ace Attorney

[L10]

1. yes
2. yes
3. We hardly have any relation to nintendo anymore, so na
4. Weeaboo

[Custom]

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? Yes.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Yes.
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes. We are a gaymen forum after all.
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Weeaboo.

[JrDude]

[bg-color=Green]1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? No, but it should be called something else, just not Slowpoke.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Sure, why not?
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes.
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Fawful. I HAVE FURY![/bg-color]
[bg-color=Navy]When it comes to pips, I can help a little, I have before ;3[/bg-color]

[Kilroy]

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? No.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? I like it, so yes
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Gaming, yes, Nintendo, not necessarily
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? Ace of Spades

[The Seventh]

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? No.
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? Yes.
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? Yes.
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? even though I already have the one I like, I'd say Ace Attorney...

[Magnum]

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke?
YES! YES!
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul?
NO! NO!
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status?
YES! YES!
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be?
NO! NO! Oh wait, I'm going to go for Ace Attorney

[Lotos]

1. Sure
2. Yesss
3. Gaming, yes.
4. Weeaboo

[Dr.Hobo2]

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke? yes
2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul? sure
3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status? yes
4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be? The Guy

[Mystic]

1. Should Bane of Serious Discussion be renamed Slowpoke?
Yes

2. Should Fighting Polygon be kept around in the event of a total overhaul?
What the poop is that? I'll say yes.

3. Should the ranks, if completely overhauled, maintain their largely Nintendo/Gaming related status?
Yes

4. If you could choose one of the above to be user selectable, which would it be?
The Guy

[Doodle]

You people suck, wanting to rename BoSD.

[JrDude]

You people suck, wanting to rename BSoD.

What's BSoD again?
Ban Serious of Discussion?