The NSFCD Tater Instigator- No Descriptions Required

Super · March 23, 2009, 01:22:45 PM

A few years ago, I was in this accident. It sucked.

But now, my back was hurting again from it. I visited the doctor yesterday to see what the hell was going on.

Boy, those X-rays sure were neato.

Doodle · March 23, 2009, 01:40:22 PM

Quote from: Nayrman on March 23, 2009, 09:09:04 AM
I too think the ability to change your own name is a bit much. I don't change my name because it gets really confusing....

I know. It starts to get confusing, remembering who everyone is.

Magnum · March 23, 2009, 01:47:03 PM

Ha haha. I finally used it!

Such a difference.

yes.derek · March 23, 2009, 01:53:23 PM

So, anyone want to give me an approximate year when this Twilight fad will go the way of Harry Potter?

i.e. people will stop jizzing their pants over it.

Doodle · March 23, 2009, 02:55:12 PM

Isn't there more than one book?
If so, a year or two after all those have been made into books. -_-

Syncopathic · March 23, 2009, 03:04:20 PM

Quote from: DOODLEboy99 on March 23, 2009, 05:47:09 AM
Well, I was messing with it for a bit. I'm back to DOODLEboy99, though. :)
I might use El Dood every now and then, for you Sync. :P

Fuck yes.
In fact, CHANGE IT NOW.
EL DOOD IS BETTER.

Doodle · March 23, 2009, 03:17:19 PM

Quote from: Syncathopy on March 23, 2009, 03:04:20 PM
Quote from: DOODLEboy99 on March 23, 2009, 05:47:09 AM
Well, I was messing with it for a bit. I'm back to DOODLEboy99, though. :)
I might use El Dood every now and then, for you Sync. :P
f*** yes.
In fact, CHANGE IT NOW.
EL DOOD IS BETTER.

'Kay. You get your El Dood.

Mystic · March 23, 2009, 04:27:16 PM

Quote from: yes.derek on March 23, 2009, 01:53:23 PM
So, anyone want to give me an approximate year when this Twilight fad will go the way of Harry Potter?

i.e. people will stop jizzing their pants over it.

When people realize HP > Twilight

HTA! · March 23, 2009, 04:54:00 PM

Quote from: Mystic on March 23, 2009, 04:27:16 PM
Quote from: yes.derek on March 23, 2009, 01:53:23 PM
So, anyone want to give me an approximate year when this Twilight fad will go the way of Harry Potter?

i.e. people will stop jizzing their pants over it.
When people realize HP > Twilight

When people realize...
Everything > HP > Twilight

Mystic · March 23, 2009, 05:16:24 PM

Quote from: Sinbad on March 23, 2009, 04:54:00 PM
Quote from: Mystic on March 23, 2009, 04:27:16 PM
Quote from: yes.derek on March 23, 2009, 01:53:23 PM
So, anyone want to give me an approximate year when this Twilight fad will go the way of Harry Potter?

i.e. people will stop jizzing their pants over it.
When people realize HP > Twilight
When people realize...
Everything > HP > Twilight

No. Harry Potter is badass. Well, aside from the 5th book.

Kilroy · March 23, 2009, 05:17:39 PM

...

Evidently "ノ" means "Roh".

what the intercourse is a roh

Nayrman · March 23, 2009, 05:19:06 PM

Quote from: Mystic on March 23, 2009, 05:16:24 PM
Quote from: Sinbad on March 23, 2009, 04:54:00 PM
Quote from: Mystic on March 23, 2009, 04:27:16 PM
Quote from: yes.derek on March 23, 2009, 01:53:23 PM
So, anyone want to give me an approximate year when this Twilight fad will go the way of Harry Potter?

i.e. people will stop jizzing their pants over it.
When people realize HP > Twilight
When people realize...
Everything > HP > Twilight

No. Harry Potter is badass. Well, aside from the 5th book.

better than most popular books.
Unlike Twilight Rowling took her time and actually made sure it all made sense and was good. Twilight is horribly written, and an even worse story. I mean really, it's just bad Hellsing fanfiction that actually got published. Oh, and I"m sorry, VAMPIRES IN SUNLIGHT DO NOT SHINE IT'S AGAINST THE RULES

Super · March 23, 2009, 05:19:41 PM

Guys, if you are mad off at Twilight, just watch Blade.

yes.derek · March 23, 2009, 06:08:34 PM

Quote from: Super on March 23, 2009, 05:19:41 PM
Guys, if you are mad off at Twilight, just watch Blade.

Ah yes, Blade.

A simpler time, when vampires actually did vampire things, and there weren't an hour and a half's worth of uncomfortably huge close-ups thrown together and called a film.

Macawmoses · March 23, 2009, 06:12:02 PM

And Blade has killing. Lots and lots of killing.