A number of incidents have taken place in the last several weeks which have troubled many members of our community. I would like to start by discussing NSider Forums's ploys, mainly because they scare me. The thing I'm the most frightened about is that NSider Forums keeps missing my point. More specifically, it keeps getting hung up on my words without seeing the underlying meaning. For example, when I say that it is impracticable to place a high value on honor and self-respect without exploiting the inner unity of our national will, NSider Forums seems incapable of realizing that what I'm really getting at is that it keeps stating over and over again that it's inappropriate to teach children right from wrong. This drumbeat refrain is clearly not consistent with the facts on the ground -- facts such as that today, we might have let NSider Forums give an air of scientific impartiality to biased judgments. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will maintain social tranquillity.
If you are not smart enough to realize this, then you become the victim of your own ignorance. NSider Forums has a strategy. Its strategy is to cause people to betray one another and hate one another. Wherever you encounter that strategy, you are dealing with NSider Forums. There's something fishy about NSider Forums's excuses. I think it's up to something, something perverted and perhaps even empty-headed.
Once it becomes clear that it is up to each of us to reinforce what is best in people, it becomes apparent that I could go on for pages listing innumerable examples of NSider Forums's biggety newsgroup postings and ultra-hotheaded complaints. I have already written enough, surely, to convince you that NSider Forums is a caustic varmint. I use that label only when it's true. If you don't believe it is, then consider that NSider Forums uses radicalism to kill the messenger and control the message. That's the large elephant in the room that nobody talks about. Nevertheless, I obviously contend that people really ought to start talking about it because then they'd realize that we must seek liberty, equality, and fraternity if we are ever to introduce an important but underrepresented angle on its rambunctious zingers. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must unequivocally pursue because I once managed to get NSider Forums to agree that its cringers work behind the scenes to sully my reputation. Unfortunately, a few minutes later, NSider Forums did a volte-face and denied that it had ever said that. Some day, I want to resolve a number of lingering problems. But you don't have to wait for that. What you can do now is talk to everyone you know about the things I've told you in this letter. Use every medium available to you. Use the Internet. Use your telephone. Use radio and newspapers. And whatever you do, never be afraid to speak out against the evil that is NSider Forums.
tl;dr
No really what?
Lol this doesnt relate to nsider at all. Its crazy talk. :(
Quote from: britneymahboy on January 01, 2008, 11:34:21 PM
Lol this doesnt relate to nsider at all. Its crazy talk. :(
have you ever been to oldsider?
Quote from: Ludwig3 on January 01, 2008, 11:35:55 PM
Quote from: britneymahboy on January 01, 2008, 11:34:21 PM
Lol this doesnt relate to nsider at all. Its crazy talk. :(
have you ever been to oldsider?
Yes... i dont think you should try to understad that stupid rant that much...
Umm, I actually read all of that O_o
Now, I agree, I do want brains for brikfast :P Tastes Good!
Basically you called us all intercourse ing mindless zombies.
Have you ever read Shakespeares THE MERCHANT OF VENICE? There is a character, Gratiano, who talks and talks. His friend, Bassanio, then tells another something along the lines of
"Gratiano speaks a great deal about nothing. It would take a very long time to decipher what he truly means."
So, if we are the zombies you say we are, does that mean we can't have brains for brekfast? I mean, decipher your code?
Seriously, seriously, seriously, we are not zombies, as much as I like brains for brekfist.
Quote from: britneymahboy on January 01, 2008, 11:38:52 PM
Quote from: Ludwig3 on January 01, 2008, 11:35:55 PM
Quote from: britneymahboy on January 01, 2008, 11:34:21 PM
Lol this doesnt relate to nsider at all. Its crazy talk. :(
have you ever been to oldsider?
Yes... i dont think you should try to understad that stupid rant that much...
srsly?! what was your old screenname?
How does this relate to us?
Quote from: Ludwig3 on January 01, 2008, 11:39:55 PM
Quote from: britneymahboy on January 01, 2008, 11:38:52 PM
Quote from: Ludwig3 on January 01, 2008, 11:35:55 PM
Quote from: britneymahboy on January 01, 2008, 11:34:21 PM
Lol this doesnt relate to nsider at all. Its crazy talk. :(
have you ever been to oldsider?
Yes... i dont think you should try to understad that stupid rant that much...
srsly?! what was your old screenname?
I had quite a few, what was urs?
Quote from: britneymahboy on January 01, 2008, 11:41:22 PM
Quote from: Ludwig3 on January 01, 2008, 11:39:55 PM
Quote from: britneymahboy on January 01, 2008, 11:38:52 PM
Quote from: Ludwig3 on January 01, 2008, 11:35:55 PM
Quote from: britneymahboy on January 01, 2008, 11:34:21 PM
Lol this doesnt relate to nsider at all. Its crazy talk. :(
have you ever been to oldsider?
Yes... i dont think you should try to understad that stupid rant that much...
srsly?! what was your old screenname?
I had quite a few, what was urs?
the same one i have here...
Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 01, 2008, 11:41:20 PM
How does this relate to us?
I can see you are good at re-wording. :P
yay for complaint generators
At times, we all have an axe to grind. Currently, I'm grinding my axe in regards to Mr. Mario583's modes of thought. And that's why I feel compelled to say something about self-satisfied imbeciles. Mario583 somehow manages to get away with spreading lies (the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully), distortions (every word that leaves his mouth is teeming with useful information), and misplaced idealism (defeatism resonates with the body's natural alpha waves). However, when I try to respond in kind, I get censored faster than you can say "undiscriminatingness". I am, of course, referring to a recent occurrence that is so well-known it requires no comment except to add that he cannot be tamed by "tolerance" and "accommodation" but is actually spurred on by such gestures. Mario583 sees such gestures as a sign of weakness on our part and is thereby encouraged to continue destroying our moral fiber.
Though vindictive anarchism is not discussed in this letter, much of what I've written applies to that, as well. Mario583 claims that everyone who scrambles aboard the Mario583 bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride. Sound suspicious? Short-sighted is a better word. Two quick comments: 1) All he does is complain, complain, complain, and 2) it's his deep-seated belief that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive. Sure, he might be able to justify conclusions like that -- using biased or one-sided information, of course -- but I prefer to know the whole story. In this case, the whole story is that our battle with Mario583 is a battle between spiritualism and nepotism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that Mario583's stances will have consequences -- very serious consequences. We ought to begin doing something about that. We ought to increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences. We ought to spread the word that statements like, "None of his 'progressive' ideas have actually resulted in any progress" accurately express the feelings of most of us here.
I would like to give you an example of how juvenile Mario583 can be. Mario583 has admitted that he intends to canonize hopeless marauders (especially the duplicitous type) as nomological emblems of propriety. Okay, that may have been a particularly bald-faced and unsubtle example but I deeply believe that it's within our grasp to deal stiffly with mawkish, supercilious gutter-dwellers who deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. Be grateful for this first and last tidbit of comforting news. The rest of this letter will center around the way that his older personal attacks were wretched enough. His latest ones are decidedly beyond the pale. In closing, I consider this letter to be required reading for everyone who still cares that people like Mr. Mario583 make me sick. Unfortunately, with our nation's media being as controlled as it is, there's no way that this letter will be widely publicized. Therefore, I'm counting on you to pass on this letter to all of your e-mail contacts. Thank you.
Quote from: Sorasnobody on January 01, 2008, 11:45:10 PM
At times, we all have an axe to grind. Currently, I'm grinding my axe in regards to Mr. Mario583's modes of thought. And that's why I feel compelled to say something about self-satisfied imbeciles. Mario583 somehow manages to get away with spreading lies (the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully), distortions (every word that leaves his mouth is teeming with useful information), and misplaced idealism (defeatism resonates with the body's natural alpha waves). However, when I try to respond in kind, I get censored faster than you can say "undiscriminatingness". I am, of course, referring to a recent occurrence that is so well-known it requires no comment except to add that he cannot be tamed by "tolerance" and "accommodation" but is actually spurred on by such gestures. Mario583 sees such gestures as a sign of weakness on our part and is thereby encouraged to continue destroying our moral fiber.
Though vindictive anarchism is not discussed in this letter, much of what I've written applies to that, as well. Mario583 claims that everyone who scrambles aboard the Mario583 bandwagon is guaranteed a smooth ride. Sound suspicious? Short-sighted is a better word. Two quick comments: 1) All he does is complain, complain, complain, and 2) it's his deep-seated belief that it's perfectly safe to drink and drive. Sure, he might be able to justify conclusions like that -- using biased or one-sided information, of course -- but I prefer to know the whole story. In this case, the whole story is that our battle with Mario583 is a battle between spiritualism and nepotism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that Mario583's stances will have consequences -- very serious consequences. We ought to begin doing something about that. We ought to increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences. We ought to spread the word that statements like, "None of his 'progressive' ideas have actually resulted in any progress" accurately express the feelings of most of us here.
I would like to give you an example of how juvenile Mario583 can be. Mario583 has admitted that he intends to canonize hopeless marauders (especially the duplicitous type) as nomological emblems of propriety. Okay, that may have been a particularly bald-faced and unsubtle example but I deeply believe that it's within our grasp to deal stiffly with mawkish, supercilious gutter-dwellers who deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. Be grateful for this first and last tidbit of comforting news. The rest of this letter will center around the way that his older personal attacks were wretched enough. His latest ones are decidedly beyond the pale. In closing, I consider this letter to be required reading for everyone who still cares that people like Mr. Mario583 make me sick. Unfortunately, with our nation's media being as controlled as it is, there's no way that this letter will be widely publicized. Therefore, I'm counting on you to pass on this letter to all of your e-mail contacts. Thank you.
lol thats funny
am writing to express my concerns about Rabbi Mario583 and, more specifically, his intimations regarding what I call querulous mythomaniacs. So let's begin, quite properly, with a brief look at the historical development of the problem, of its attempted solutions, and of the eternal argument about it. He whines about birdbrained personæ non gratæ, yet Rabbi Mario583 enthusiastically supports overbearing polluters. A word to the wise: His intent is to prevent us from asking questions. Rabbi Mario583 doesn't want the details checked. He doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts he presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of his "facts" are false.
I won't bore you with the details, but suffice it to say that it strikes me as amusing that Rabbi Mario583 complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! He does nothing but complain.
I feel funny having to tell readers whom I presume are adults that I am weary of listening to Rabbi Mario583 descant on the glories of absolutism. I bring that up solely to emphasize that Rabbi Mario583's subalterns are merely ciphers. Rabbi Mario583 is the one who decides whether or not to toss quaint concepts like decency, fairness, and rational debate out the window. Rabbi Mario583 is the one who gives out the orders to depressurize the frail vessel of human hopes. And Rabbi Mario583 is the one trying to conceal how if five years ago I had described a person like Rabbi Mario583 to you and told you that in five years he'd grasp at straws, trying to find increasingly wishy-washy ways to ascribe opinions to me that I don't even hold, you'd have thought me hectoring. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how the problem of parasitic weasels serves as an excuse for him to express his own hostility and frustrated need for power. Stated differently, if you've read this far then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me.
Is that such a difficult concept? Rabbi Mario583's idiotic claim that sneaky fribbles are more deserving of honor than our nation's war heroes is just that, an idiotic claim. Rabbi Mario583 represents a new breed of crotchety, abusive numskulls. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: To what depths of depravity does Rabbi Mario583 need to descend before the rest of us realize we must tell it like it is? I don't pretend to know the answer but I do know that if I wanted to brainwash and manipulate a large segment of the population, I would convince them that Man's eternal search for Truth is a challenge to be avoided at all costs. In fact, that's exactly what Rabbi Mario583 does as part of his quest to conspire with evil.
Because of Rabbi Mario583's obsession with denominationalism, he appears to have found a new tool to use to help him make widespread accusations and insinuations without having the facts to back them up. That tool is anti-intellectualism, and if you watch him wield it, you'll unequivocally see why there are some nugatory yahoos who are caustic. There are also some who are insensitive. Which category does Rabbi Mario583 fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both". The basal lie that underlies all of Rabbi Mario583's indelicate bruta fulmina is that plagiarism is absolutely essential to the well-being of society. Translation: Principles don't matter. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views but you should nevertheless be aware that Rabbi Mario583 has announced his intentions to block streets and traffic to the extent that ambulances can't get through. While doing so may earn Rabbi Mario583 a gold star from the mush-for-brains frotteurism crowd, some people think I'm exaggerating when I say that I am declaring open season on soulless wankers like him who exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in managing both the news and the entertainment that gets presented to us. But I'm not exaggerating; if anything, I'm understating the situation. In closing, please remember that my ultimate goal is to examine the warp and woof of Rabbi Mario583's witticisms. If I advance, follow me. If I stop, urge me on. If I retreat, kill me.
Yes, im calling you rabbi :|
In a prior letter, I identified a set of ideological premises as superordinate constructions that maintain the rhetorical context in which Miss Mackormoses is able to recover the dead past by annihilating the living present. I will now elaborate on three of her most impertinent premises:
1. She knows 100% of everything 100% of the time.
2. Free speech is wonderful as long as you're not bashing her and the insincere ruffians in her coterie.
3. She is a refined lady with the soundest education and morals you can imagine.
And that's why I feel compelled to say something about vulgar, hotheaded jerks. Whenever she tries to harm others or even instill the fear of harm, so do footling pinheads. Similarly, whenever she attempts to create widespread hysteria, self-centered wankers typically attempt the same. I do not seek to draw any causal scheme from these correlations. I mention them only because if I want to lose my temper, that should be my prerogative. I don't need her forcing me to.
Mackormoses doesn't have any principles, or if she does, she puts them aside whenever they're inconvenient. She says she's not psychotic but she's undeniably impolitic and that's essentially the same thing. I have a hard time trying to reason with people who remain calm when they see Mackormoses break down traditional values. How dare she lead to the destruction of the human race? From a purely technical point of view, difficult times lie ahead. Fortunately, we have the capacity to circumvent much of the impending misery by working together to compare, contrast, and identify the connections among different sorts of spleeny sectarianism. Easy as it may seem to remind Mackormoses about the concept of truth in advertising, it is far more difficult to provide you with vital information which Mackormoses has gone to great lengths to prevent you from discovering.
We can say that Mackormoses favors the idea of a country based on perquisites and privileges, and Mackormoses can claim the opposite, and it won't make one bit of difference. Wouldn't it be wonderful if we lived in a world without hypocritical, deceitful flakes? While she has a right to her opinion, I stand by what I've written before, that she always cavils at my attempts to report as best as possible the facts and circumstances surrounding her squalid, malignant comments. That's probably because it is a dangerous folly to ignore the threat to democracy posed by snippy slackers. To say anything else would be a lie. I am hurt, furious, and embarrassed. Why am I hurt? Because on several occasions I have heard Mackormoses state that clericalism forms the core of any utopian society. I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a comment. What I consider far more important though is that if we don't address the legitimate anger, fear, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by Mackormoses because they saw no other options for change, our children will curse us in our graves. Speaking of our children, we need to teach them diligently that Mackormoses looks primarily at a person's superficial qualities such as physiognomy and mannerisms. I, in contrast, consider how likely a person is to break the spell of great expectations that now binds the most pathetic ideologues you'll ever see to Mackormoses. That's what's important to me. Either way, she is out to shake belief in all existing institutions through the systematic perversion of both contemporary and historical facts. And when we play her game, we become accomplices. Why am I furious? Because Mackormoses's philosophies should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that Mackormoses's apothegms are intended to agitate for indoctrination programs in local schools." And why am I embarrassed? Because if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will obviously find that Mackormoses and her pals are insipid, stinking reprobates. This is not set down in complaint against them, but merely as analysis.
Mackormoses's causing all sorts of problems for us. We must grasp these problems with both hands and deal with them in a forthright way. In case you have any doubts, I frequently wish to tell Mackormoses that I wish bookish, vainglorious hostes generis humani had the gumption not to silence anyone whom she considers amateurish. But being a generally genteel person, however, I always bite my tongue. She just reported that she does the things she does "for the children". Do you think that that's merely sloppy reporting on Mackormoses's part? I don't. I think that it's a deliberate attempt to instill a general ennui.
Mackormoses's bad enough when she's alone but she's even worse when she's joined by morally crippled sideshow barkers. Mackormoses refers to a variety of things using the word "anthropoteleological". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, she's saying that we can stop antiheroism merely by permitting government officials entrée into private homes to search for sinister, brainless geeks, which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, her allies don't really care that the law is not just a moral stance. It is the consensus of society on our minimum standards of behavior. So, sorry for being so long-winded in this letter, but you don't need a preschool diploma to understand that Miss Mackormoses's certainly speaking through her hat when she says that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to cater to the basest instincts of ultra-deluded phonies.
Table turn!
Yes, Miss I am :)
Quote from: mackormoses on January 01, 2008, 11:54:11 PM
Yes, Miss I am :)
Indeed, you are. Lol, I'm going to do this on NSider 2.
Quote from: Sorasnobody on January 01, 2008, 11:55:58 PM
Quote from: mackormoses on January 01, 2008, 11:54:11 PM
Yes, Miss I am :)
Indeed, you are. Lol, I'm going to do this on NSider 2.
the idiots wont understand a single word.
All of you shut the hell up.
Wow this was taken completely different here.
Lol i read the first couple of sentences, and all im gonna say is quit crying. Next time make it short and simple :|
Quote from: ChunkeyMunkey on January 02, 2008, 12:22:44 AM
Lol i read the first couple of sentences, and all im gonna say is quit crying. Next time make it short and simple :|
Yes please!
And as puniushment for making it EXCRUCIATINGLY long:
(http://halshop.files.wordpress.com/2007/03/phpw9jvl0pm.jpg)
Stop with the complaint generator.