NSFCD

Game-o-rama => Console Gaming => Topic started by: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 01:50:36 PM

Title: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 01:50:36 PM
If Sakurai had just at least kept the other 5 veterans there would be 40 characters. I guess he was more concerned about music. ????
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: Cornwad on January 31, 2008, 01:53:51 PM
He did keep Y. Link...

And whats wrong with music?
No one wants clones anyway.
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: HYRULESEAS on January 31, 2008, 01:56:59 PM
Maybe so, or he was focusing on the other things, like game modes or something.
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: Mutilator7 on January 31, 2008, 01:57:31 PM
yeah, i think this game was all about a "new experience"
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 02:06:16 PM
the only way he could say that young link returned is to say that he got plastic surgery which is making him Toon Link. I like Toon Link, but why not put Young Link back for the heck of it?
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: Skye8600 on January 31, 2008, 02:24:20 PM
Quote from: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 02:06:16 PM
the only way he could say that young link returned is to say that he got plastic surgery which is making him Toon Link. I like Toon Link, but why not put Young Link back for the heck of it?
3 Links?
No Way
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: Red on January 31, 2008, 02:26:34 PM
Quote from: Skye8600 on January 31, 2008, 02:24:20 PM
Quote from: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 02:06:16 PM
the only way he could say that young link returned is to say that he got plastic surgery which is making him Toon Link. I like Toon Link, but why not put Young Link back for the heck of it?
3 Links?
No Way
3 foxes...
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: Skye8600 on January 31, 2008, 02:27:46 PM
Quote from: RedSox on January 31, 2008, 02:26:34 PM
Quote from: Skye8600 on January 31, 2008, 02:24:20 PM
Quote from: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 02:06:16 PM
the only way he could say that young link returned is to say that he got plastic surgery which is making him Toon Link. I like Toon Link, but why not put Young Link back for the heck of it?
3 Links?
No Way
3 foxes...
....touche
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: Lotos on January 31, 2008, 02:31:28 PM
Quote from: RedSox on January 31, 2008, 02:26:34 PM
Quote from: Skye8600 on January 31, 2008, 02:24:20 PM
Quote from: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 02:06:16 PM
the only way he could say that young link returned is to say that he got plastic surgery which is making him Toon Link. I like Toon Link, but why not put Young Link back for the heck of it?
3 Links?
No Way
3 foxes...
There were about three Marios in Melee, Luigi was a little less of a clone though.
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 02:34:15 PM
Isn't having 50 characters with some being clones better than only 35 ????
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: Skye8600 on January 31, 2008, 02:35:23 PM
Quote from: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 02:34:15 PM
Isn't having 50 characters with some being clones better than only 35 ????
not really
if you have a ton of clones, characters would get boring quickly. this 35 roster is fine with me
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: X-3 on January 31, 2008, 02:37:22 PM
Quote from: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 02:06:16 PM
the only way he could say that young link returned is to say that he got plastic surgery which is making him Toon Link. I like Toon Link, but why not put Young Link back for the heck of it?

They were going for a TP-ish theme for Zelda, Toon Link being an exception. Young Link wouldn't fit in at all.

And technically, there are actually 40 characters, if you count the PKMN Trainer's Pokemon, ZSS and Shiek. But meh, ZSS is almost unplayable in the first place, so...

I'm fine with the roster. More good then bad in it.
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: Michael227 on January 31, 2008, 02:45:22 PM
Quote from: X-3 on January 31, 2008, 02:37:22 PM
Quote from: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 02:06:16 PM
the only way he could say that young link returned is to say that he got plastic surgery which is making him Toon Link. I like Toon Link, but why not put Young Link back for the heck of it?

They were going for a TP-ish theme for Zelda, Toon Link being an exception. Young Link wouldn't fit in at all.

And technically, there are actually 40 characters, if you count the PKMN Trainer's Pokemon, ZSS and Shiek. But meh, ZSS is almost unplayable in the first place, so...

I'm fine with the roster. More good then bad in it.
actualy if you hold a when selecting a stage with samus you start a ZSS
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: CrazyGamer on January 31, 2008, 03:20:36 PM
Toon Link is Young Link, just with a different art style.

And hey, 35 works for me. I'm pretty satisfied...
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 03:55:58 PM
hey i'm satisfied with the 35 characters, but they could've easily added more, especially with all that time they had.
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: QingXin on January 31, 2008, 04:54:24 PM
I just wanna know...

WHERE THE HELL IS RIDLEY, BLACK SHADOW, AND KING K. ROOL?!?!?!?!?!?!?! I WAS THIS CLOSE TO WINNING A BET!!!! RAWRRRRR!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: Tupin on January 31, 2008, 04:56:06 PM
Quote from: TamJammerz on January 31, 2008, 04:54:24 PM
I just wanna know...

WHERE THE HELL IS RIDLEY, BLACK SHADOW, AND KING K. ROOL?!?!?!?!?!?!?! I WAS THIS CLOSE TO WINNING A BET!!!! RAWRRRRR!!!!!!!!
Ridley: Boss in SSE.
Black Shadow: Trophy.
King K. Rool: Trophy.
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: thunderhero4 on January 31, 2008, 04:56:24 PM
Quote from: TamJammerz on January 31, 2008, 04:54:24 PM
I just wanna know...

WHERE THE HELL IS RIDLEY, BLACK SHADOW, AND KING K. ROOL?!?!?!?!?!?!?! I WAS THIS CLOSE TO WINNING A BET!!!! RAWRRRRR!!!!!!!!
I said if the roster is over 40, I would find and buy a Sonic costume and do a barrel roll on film and show it to the posters here! TOO BAD SUCKORZ! :P
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: Neerb on January 31, 2008, 05:49:37 PM
I'd actually like having 30 characters with 20 clones (for a total of 50).  YAYZ FOR LOTZ OF KARACTERZEZ!
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: Oren on January 31, 2008, 05:54:57 PM
Quote from: tibar7 on January 31, 2008, 03:55:58 PM
hey i'm satisfied with the 35 characters, but they could've easily added more, especially with all that time they had.
thats what i think too
all this time and only 35 with some of them being clones?
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: tibar7 on February 01, 2008, 08:34:46 AM
Ridley and Midna would've been great characters since it would extremely easy not to make them clones
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: zeldaguy6 on February 01, 2008, 06:17:13 PM
yea, not really... not pichu. roy maybe.
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: SWORD21 on February 01, 2008, 06:20:00 PM
I'm fine with this roster. My mains are back along with more characters.
Title: Re: Underachieving Playable Roster
Post by: tibar7 on February 01, 2008, 11:58:31 PM
it's a good thing Young Link isn't my main character any more. Toon Link will probably have a much different style.