NSFCD

Generally Speaking => Power On => Topic started by: Doodle on February 08, 2009, 03:55:34 PM

Title: Destroy A Game/Apparently Vent About Games You Were Disappointed By
Post by: Doodle on February 08, 2009, 03:55:34 PM
Give one way to destroy a perfectly good game.
Give it the best online, but a 64 digit friend code that changes every week.

GO.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 03:57:07 PM
Copy OoT, but make it too easy, put pointless fetch quests, gimmicky motion controls, and a half-assed story...

OH WAIT...
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Titus Andronicus on February 08, 2009, 03:58:03 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 03:57:07 PM
Copy OoT, but make it too easy, put pointless fetch quests, gimmicky motion controls, and a half-assed story...

OH WAIT...
Don't forget an oversized map that you won't use half of the time!
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Tupin on February 08, 2009, 04:00:01 PM
Quote from: SolidSNK on February 08, 2009, 03:58:03 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 03:57:07 PM
Copy OoT, but make it too easy, put pointless fetch quests, gimmicky motion controls, and a half-assed story...

OH WAIT...
Don't forget an oversized map that you won't use half of the time!
Ooh, don't forget the emotionless characters that you can see their role in the story from a mile away!
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 04:03:59 PM
Quote from: Tupin on February 08, 2009, 04:00:01 PM
Quote from: SolidSNK on February 08, 2009, 03:58:03 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 03:57:07 PM
Copy OoT, but make it too easy, put pointless fetch quests, gimmicky motion controls, and a half-assed story...

OH WAIT...
Don't forget an oversized map that you won't use half of the time!
Ooh, don't forget the emotionless characters that you can see their role in the story from a mile away!
There were no roles. Bulbax (or whatever the pig riding dude's name was) was only there for filler...
We could go on forever about TP alone...so I guess something else. (worst 3D Zelda, by far)

Let's see...
Take an exploration game, but make it beyond linear, add shoddy voice acting and side characters no one likes, and make at least two wholly uninteresting sections due to them practically being a straight path.

Oh wait... X_X;;
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Lotos on February 08, 2009, 04:07:46 PM
Take brawl, remove online and SSE.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 04:09:25 PM
Quote from: Lotos on February 08, 2009, 04:07:46 PM
Take brawl, remove online and SSE.
actually I'd consider those improvements based on how bad both of them were... X_X;;
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 04:11:51 PM
expand on your previous smash hit by doing the exact same thing, except restricting ammo use, limiting exploration, implementing a damaging environment to discourage exploration, making 90% of the bosses easy and 10% unbeatable the first time through, use the same story that everyone else has used for the last 10 years, while not expanding at all on the one established in the previous title, making half of the game dreary, boring, and monotonous, add in an even bigger fetch quest than the previous game, except this time make it so that you can't collect them on the way

oh

wait.

I can do another one of these too! :D
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Zovistograt on February 08, 2009, 04:12:12 PM
Make a game where you fly through extremely expansive and fantastic worlds and then force the player to be on a rail the whole time.

...I'm still annoyed at that.  I don't care if the original was like that too.  It's stupid.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Silverhawk79 on February 08, 2009, 04:14:57 PM
Take an FPS, but add card-based elements!
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Doodle on February 08, 2009, 04:16:04 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 04:09:25 PM
Quote from: Lotos on February 08, 2009, 04:07:46 PM
Take brawl, remove online and SSE.
actually I'd consider those improvements based on how bad both of them were... X_X;;
I actually kind of liked the SSE... :P
And the online was ok once you fixed up your connection. But it was still laggy if you did With Anyone matches.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 04:19:40 PM
Quote from: DOODLEboy99 on February 08, 2009, 04:16:04 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 04:09:25 PM
Quote from: Lotos on February 08, 2009, 04:07:46 PM
Take brawl, remove online and SSE.
actually I'd consider those improvements based on how bad both of them were... X_X;;
I actually kind of liked the SSE... :P
And the online was ok once you fixed up your connection. But it was still laggy if you did With Anyone matches.
It's just laggy regardless...just not as much with friends because you know who you are connecting to. Too bad Nintendo won't actually pony up for some darn servers.
SSE was okay, it had it's moments but it was still just a generic beat 'em up. The boss battles were epic in a way.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Tupin on February 08, 2009, 04:22:31 PM
Oh, and here's a good one:
Take a game where the only reason someone would play it is that they could go fast and add team elements that require you to slow down, three unneeded difficulty levels, and add in a theme song to make it somewhat better.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 04:23:49 PM
Take Devil May Cry, but slap a black emo anthromorphic hedgehog's on it instead of Dante...
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 04:24:23 PM
Quote from: Tupin on February 08, 2009, 04:22:31 PM
Oh, and here's a good one:
Take a game where the only reason someone would play it is that they could go fast and add team elements that require you to slow down, three unneeded difficulty levels, and add in a theme song to make it somewhat better.


which one is that?


and come on, nobody got the MP2 reference? :\
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 04:26:02 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 04:24:23 PM
Quote from: Tupin on February 08, 2009, 04:22:31 PM
Oh, and here's a good one:
Take a game where the only reason someone would play it is that they could go fast and add team elements that require you to slow down, three unneeded difficulty levels, and add in a theme song to make it somewhat better.


which one is that?


and come on, nobody got the MP2 reference? :\
I got it...it was pretty obvious.
And he's talking about Sonic Heroes...
Although I don't really complain about Dark story though. The extra difficulty was kind of fun. It's Team Rose (c'mon, a three year old could beat Team Rose) and Chaotix...they were utter crap.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Tupin on February 08, 2009, 04:27:18 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 04:24:23 PM
Quote from: Tupin on February 08, 2009, 04:22:31 PM
Oh, and here's a good one:
Take a game where the only reason someone would play it is that they could go fast and add team elements that require you to slow down, three unneeded difficulty levels, and add in a theme song to make it somewhat better.


which one is that?


and come on, nobody got the MP2 reference? :\
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7jFNXekDBk (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z7jFNXekDBk)
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Doodle on February 08, 2009, 04:29:37 PM
Put a very popular first person shooter franchise for the Wii, only chop it up and take out lots of good things that are on the other versions, like shooting zombies. >:(
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 04:35:18 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 04:26:02 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 04:24:23 PM
Quote from: Tupin on February 08, 2009, 04:22:31 PM
Oh, and here's a good one:
Take a game where the only reason someone would play it is that they could go fast and add team elements that require you to slow down, three unneeded difficulty levels, and add in a theme song to make it somewhat better.


which one is that?


and come on, nobody got the MP2 reference? :\
I got it...it was pretty obvious.
And he's talking about Sonic Heroes...
Although I don't really complain about Dark story though. The extra difficulty was kind of fun. It's Team Rose (c'mon, a three year old could beat Team Rose) and Chaotix...they were utter crap.

I've hardly played any sonic games lol - never had a sega system, and from what I've heard, all sonic games since then haven't been great.

I liked a bit of sonic heroes, but yeah, it did seem really dumb, considering how sonic is classically supposed to be superspeedy.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 04:37:25 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 04:35:18 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 04:26:02 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 04:24:23 PM
Quote from: Tupin on February 08, 2009, 04:22:31 PM
Oh, and here's a good one:
Take a game where the only reason someone would play it is that they could go fast and add team elements that require you to slow down, three unneeded difficulty levels, and add in a theme song to make it somewhat better.


which one is that?


and come on, nobody got the MP2 reference? :\
I got it...it was pretty obvious.
And he's talking about Sonic Heroes...
Although I don't really complain about Dark story though. The extra difficulty was kind of fun. It's Team Rose (c'mon, a three year old could beat Team Rose) and Chaotix...they were utter crap.

I've hardly played any sonic games lol - never had a sega system, and from what I've heard, all sonic games since then haven't been great.

I liked a bit of sonic heroes, but yeah, it did seem really dumb, considering how sonic is classically supposed to be superspeedy.
Adventure 1 and 2 are great, Heroes is "meh", Shadow is bad, but not "horrendous", Sonic 06 is as bad as Superman 64, Secret Rings is a good attempt, and Unleashed is half fantastic, half terrible God of War ripoff.



Oh, and take any game, and give it forty minute cutscenes... OH WAIT!
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Kilroy on February 08, 2009, 05:06:39 PM
First person RPG.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 05:09:26 PM
Quote from: Byte on February 08, 2009, 05:06:39 PM
First person RPG.
Fallout 3, been done and it's actually pretty good.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Kilroy on February 08, 2009, 05:23:38 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on February 08, 2009, 05:09:26 PM
Quote from: Byte on February 08, 2009, 05:06:39 PM
First person RPG.
Fallout 3, been done and it's actually pretty good.
That's not first person :|
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 05:33:35 PM
hey, Oblivion was a good game
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: HTA! on February 08, 2009, 05:51:17 PM
Make an RTS, but make it so you can only move your units between bases. :|

Screw you Endwar.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Kilroy on February 08, 2009, 05:53:51 PM
Quote from: HTA on February 08, 2009, 05:51:17 PM
Make an RTS, but make it so you can only move your units between bases. :|

Screw you Endwar.
Are you intercourse ing serious. That game looked good :(
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: HTA! on February 08, 2009, 06:23:09 PM
Quote from: Byte on February 08, 2009, 05:53:51 PM
Quote from: HTA on February 08, 2009, 05:51:17 PM
Make an RTS, but make it so you can only move your units between bases. :|

Screw you Endwar.
Are you f***ing serious. That game looked good :(
Voice commands were cool, but the only way to move units was to have them go to predetermined points on the map.
And, you can't move the camera away from your units.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Totla on February 08, 2009, 06:52:24 PM
Take one of the most amazing games ever and make the sequel so easy and short a three year old has the attention span and ability too beat it. And take any incentive to explore the map.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Rayquarian on February 08, 2009, 07:07:33 PM
Take a potentially decent shooter and give it the worst controls ever.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Titus Andronicus on February 08, 2009, 07:11:33 PM
Take a great shooting game that could work perfectly in multiplayer, but give it only four maps, no online, no character depth, and a attach a lousy swordplay aspect to it.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Mario583 on February 08, 2009, 07:13:04 PM
Sonic the Hedgehog 2006

Rush it, give it hellova lot of glitches, and long loading times every time you start a mission and going to the next segment.

OH WAIT.........
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Silverhawk79 on February 08, 2009, 07:32:54 PM
Quote from: SolidSNK on February 08, 2009, 07:11:33 PM
Take a great shooting game that could work perfectly in multiplayer, but give it only four maps, no online, no character depth, and a attach a lousy swordplay aspect to it.
What game was that? D:
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Rayquarian on February 08, 2009, 07:35:29 PM
Quote from: Silverhawk79 on February 08, 2009, 07:32:54 PM
Quote from: SolidSNK on February 08, 2009, 07:11:33 PM
Take a great shooting game that could work perfectly in multiplayer, but give it only four maps, no online, no character depth, and a attach a lousy swordplay aspect to it.
What game was that? D:
My guess would be Red Steel.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Kilroy on February 08, 2009, 07:38:47 PM
Quote from: SolidSNK on February 08, 2009, 07:11:33 PM
Take a great shooting game that could work perfectly in multiplayer, but give it only four maps, no online, no character depth, and a attach a lousy swordplay aspect to it.
Red steel was intercourse ing amazing :|
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: jnfs2014 on February 08, 2009, 08:51:09 PM
Take a Super Mario 64, add sucky fillers to it to make it better, include stupid characters/worthless bunnies, and put it on a D-pad system at $35. Oh wait.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: yes.derek on February 08, 2009, 09:02:40 PM
Take every bad aspect of a game that already exists, then add oh wait to the end of the sentence.

Oh wait.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Titus Andronicus on February 08, 2009, 09:14:00 PM
Quote from: Byte on February 08, 2009, 07:38:47 PM
Quote from: SolidSNK on February 08, 2009, 07:11:33 PM
Take a great shooting game that could work perfectly in multiplayer, but give it only four maps, no online, no character depth, and a attach a lousy swordplay aspect to it.
Red steel was intercourse ing amazing :|
I liked the multiplayer, but it feels so skin deep. The awkward sword controls made it such a ninny to use them at all (you mostly die trying to), and when trying to reload you almost always accidentally use it.

Nothing about the single player was fun. Go on straight path killing guys, kill relatively easy dude with a sword, repeat until you get to the last dude in the level who is impossibly hard to beat and by then you forgot all your sword moves.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 09:23:41 PM
metroid prime 3

oh wait
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Titus Andronicus on February 08, 2009, 09:46:55 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 09:23:41 PM
metroid prime 3

oh wait
i lold

works for metroid prime 2 although the previously mentioned description works too
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 10:20:42 PM
Quote from: SolidSNK on February 08, 2009, 09:46:55 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 09:23:41 PM
metroid prime 3

oh wait
i lold

works for metroid prime 2 although the previously mentioned description works too

haha, yep.  basically what they did from prime to prime 2 x 2.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Captain Justice on February 08, 2009, 10:31:42 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 04:11:51 PM
expand on your previous smash hit by doing the exact same thing, except restricting ammo use, limiting exploration, implementing a damaging environment to discourage exploration, making 90% of the bosses easy and 10% unbeatable the first time through, use the same story that everyone else has used for the last 10 years, while not expanding at all on the one established in the previous title, making half of the game dreary, boring, and monotonous, add in an even bigger fetch quest than the previous game, except this time make it so that you can't collect them on the way

oh

wait.

I can do another one of these too! :D
I liked Echoes, and Corruption is the best game on the Wii, hands down. (of course, considering that every game on the Wii is God awful.......well I still thought corruption was good).

Oh and if you want to ruin a game, just ask Sakurai. He did a great job of destroying a series.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Titus Andronicus on February 08, 2009, 10:41:31 PM
Quote from: Frigid_Aztec on February 08, 2009, 10:31:42 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 04:11:51 PM
expand on your previous smash hit by doing the exact same thing, except restricting ammo use, limiting exploration, implementing a damaging environment to discourage exploration, making 90% of the bosses easy and 10% unbeatable the first time through, use the same story that everyone else has used for the last 10 years, while not expanding at all on the one established in the previous title, making half of the game dreary, boring, and monotonous, add in an even bigger fetch quest than the previous game, except this time make it so that you can't collect them on the way

oh

wait.

I can do another one of these too! :D
I liked Echoes, and Corruption is the best game on the Wii, hands down. (of course, considering that every game on the Wii is God awful.......well I still thought corruption was good).

Oh and if you want to ruin a game, just ask Sakurai. He did a great job of destroying a series.
That's a stretch. While Brawl doesn't compare to Melee, I wouldn't call it a bad game by any means.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Captain Justice on February 08, 2009, 10:43:46 PM
Idk I just couldn't enjoy the game, I tried so hard to but I just got bored of it. It was so casual.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 10:56:57 PM
Quote from: Frigid_Aztec on February 08, 2009, 10:43:46 PM
Idk I just couldn't enjoy the game, I tried so hard to but I just got bored of it. It was so casual.

I have the same stance on it.  I played melee basically until Brawl came out.  it was just THAT GOOD.

MP2 was a good game, but it was a vast departure from what the series is about (well, fusion did it first, but retro didn't develop that game).

As I've always said, MP2 is a good game if not metroid, but the instant you factor it into what the metroid series has been (metroid, super metroid, prime, 2) and how exploration-based they were, MP2 feels incredibly restrictive.

MP3 is the best game on the wii (though No More Heroes with like... double the length would be better IMO), and a great game, but it just doesn't match up to what the series used to be.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: The Riddler on February 08, 2009, 10:58:37 PM
Ohwait's get old.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Silverhawk79 on February 08, 2009, 10:59:00 PM
Quote from: Frigid_Aztec on February 08, 2009, 10:31:42 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 04:11:51 PM
expand on your previous smash hit by doing the exact same thing, except restricting ammo use, limiting exploration, implementing a damaging environment to discourage exploration, making 90% of the bosses easy and 10% unbeatable the first time through, use the same story that everyone else has used for the last 10 years, while not expanding at all on the one established in the previous title, making half of the game dreary, boring, and monotonous, add in an even bigger fetch quest than the previous game, except this time make it so that you can't collect them on the way

oh

wait.

I can do another one of these too! :D
I liked Echoes, and Corruption is the best game on the Wii, hands down. (of course, considering that every game on the Wii is God awful.......well I still thought corruption was good).

Oh and if you want to ruin a game, just ask Sakurai. He did a great job of destroying a series.
SAKURAAAAAAAAAAAAAAI >:(
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Lotos on February 08, 2009, 11:49:46 PM
Let Nintendo EAD develop a Donkey Kong game.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Shujinco2 on February 09, 2009, 11:33:33 AM
Take an awesome and insanely hard FPS and make it easier, add a story (Which it doesn't need one.), get rid of all the awesome Enemies, and weapons, and make the final boss so hard a good player can't even beat it in under an hour.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Eizweir on February 09, 2009, 07:52:59 PM
Focus more on the little fun details and bonus modes instead of the simple, actual, basic gameplay.

It's not just Brawl >_<
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: The Seventh on February 10, 2009, 03:45:13 PM
Make the controls hard to get used to, and make the timing vauge.

And lag riddle it, to boot.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: SkyMyl on February 10, 2009, 04:38:12 PM
First, create an amazing action/adventure game.

Then when it's about time to start on the sequel, which is actually a prequel to the first, give it average graphics, awful controls, lots of lag/delays, lack of consistent storyline to the first, thus resulting in loads of retconning, make the enemies sadistically difficult, make the new protaganist even more emo and wangst filled than a certain Cloud, and top it off with the biggest WTF Ending in Video Game history. If you can get that far.


Then top the presentation off with "oh wait".
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: L10 on February 10, 2009, 05:59:25 PM
You guys are intercourse ing retarded.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Zovistograt on February 10, 2009, 06:01:11 PM
Quote from: Lichig0 on February 10, 2009, 05:59:25 PM
You guys are intercourse ing retarded.
It's more fun ranting in general terms about games you dislike than actually doing what this thread is about, which isn't that.  It's true.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: L10 on February 10, 2009, 06:03:03 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on February 10, 2009, 06:01:11 PM
Quote from: Lichig0 on February 10, 2009, 05:59:25 PM
You guys are intercourse ing retarded.
It's more fun ranting in general terms about games you dislike than actually doing what this thread is about, which isn't that.  It's true.
That wasn't what I was talking about.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: jnfs2014 on February 10, 2009, 06:32:25 PM
Mix an RPG with an FPS and see what you get.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Zovistograt on February 10, 2009, 06:33:37 PM
Quote from: Lichig0 on February 10, 2009, 06:03:03 PM
Quote from: Zovistograt on February 10, 2009, 06:01:11 PM
Quote from: Lichig0 on February 10, 2009, 05:59:25 PM
You guys are intercourse ing retarded.
It's more fun ranting in general terms about games you dislike than actually doing what this thread is about, which isn't that.  It's true.
That wasn't what I was talking about.
well it was a good guess.

ah well.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Tupin on February 10, 2009, 06:50:15 PM
Quote from: JNeedForSpeed2014 on February 10, 2009, 06:32:25 PM
Mix an RPG with an FPS and see what you get.
Fallout 3.

Oh, and take an already obscure series on an obscure platform that has problems, improve the graphics, make the controls even worse, and make it so you cannot attack any enemies at all.

You'll never get this one, so I'll tell you. It's the second Alex Kidd game, Alex Kidd: The Lost Stars.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Nayrman on February 10, 2009, 06:51:44 PM
Take any licensed material...and make a game out of it! *Note: there is the rare exception*
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Tupin on February 10, 2009, 06:57:37 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on February 10, 2009, 06:51:44 PM
Take any licensed material...and make a game out of it! *Note: there is the rare exception*
Notably, any licensed game made by Capcom.

Little Nemo, Yo Noid, Willow, Magical Quest, Chip and Dale, Darkwing Duck, Duck Tales, Little Mermaid are all good licensed games that all happen to be made by Capcom.

Don't forget the new Spiderman games, too.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Nayrman on February 10, 2009, 06:59:08 PM
Quote from: Tupin on February 10, 2009, 06:57:37 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on February 10, 2009, 06:51:44 PM
Take any licensed material...and make a game out of it! *Note: there is the rare exception*
Notably, any licensed game made by Capcom.

Little Nemo, Yo Noid, Willow, Magical Quest, Chip and Dale, Darkwing Duck, Duck Tales, Little Mermaid are all good licensed games that all happen to be made by Capcom.

Don't forget the new Spiderman games, too.
Spider-Man is very hit and miss, but I admit of all the superheroes he gets the best games.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Custom on February 10, 2009, 07:01:08 PM
Quote from: Tupin on February 10, 2009, 06:50:15 PM
Quote from: JNeedForSpeed2014 on February 10, 2009, 06:32:25 PM
Mix an RPG with an FPS and see what you get.
Fallout 3.

Oh, and take an already obscure series on an obscure platform that has problems, improve the graphics, make the controls even worse, and make it so you cannot attack any enemies at all.

You'll never get this one, so I'll tell you. It's the second Alex Kidd game, Alex Kidd: The Lost Stars.

By Fallout 3 I hope you mean the greatest thing mankind has ever made.
I <333333 Fallout 3
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Captain Justice on February 10, 2009, 07:05:10 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on February 08, 2009, 10:56:57 PM
Quote from: Frigid_Aztec on February 08, 2009, 10:43:46 PM
Idk I just couldn't enjoy the game, I tried so hard to but I just got bored of it. It was so casual.

I have the same stance on it.  I played melee basically until Brawl came out.  it was just THAT GOOD.

MP2 was a good game, but it was a vast departure from what the series is about (well, fusion did it first, but retro didn't develop that game).

As I've always said, MP2 is a good game if not metroid, but the instant you factor it into what the metroid series has been (metroid, super metroid, prime, 2) and how exploration-based they were, MP2 feels incredibly restrictive.

MP3 is the best game on the wii (though No More Heroes with like... double the length would be better IMO), and a great game, but it just doesn't match up to what the series used to be.
Oh well yeah I agree that its def. not like any Metroid game (2 and 3, but mostly 2) but I still loved it.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game
Post by: Tupin on February 10, 2009, 07:06:38 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on February 10, 2009, 06:59:08 PM
Quote from: Tupin on February 10, 2009, 06:57:37 PM
Quote from: Nayrman on February 10, 2009, 06:51:44 PM
Take any licensed material...and make a game out of it! *Note: there is the rare exception*
Notably, any licensed game made by Capcom.

Little Nemo, Yo Noid, Willow, Magical Quest, Chip and Dale, Darkwing Duck, Duck Tales, Little Mermaid are all good licensed games that all happen to be made by Capcom.

Don't forget the new Spiderman games, too.
Spider-Man is very hit and miss, but I admit of all the superheroes he gets the best games.
Web of Shadows is pretty good, once you get over the repetitive nature of the fights.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game/Apparently Vent About Games You Were Disappointed By
Post by: Doodle on February 10, 2009, 07:22:03 PM
The title fits the thread a bit more now. :P
Title: Re: Destroy A Game/Apparently Vent About Games You Were Disappointed By
Post by: GreatGonzales106 on February 10, 2009, 08:21:23 PM
Take a game that was made for 360 or PS3 and put it on the Wii...
Title: Re: Destroy A Game/Apparently Vent About Games You Were Disappointed By
Post by: jnfs2014 on February 10, 2009, 09:07:26 PM
Take an up-and-coming franchise, make several spin-offs, and expect hardcore gamers to love it.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game/Apparently Vent About Games You Were Disappointed By
Post by: Jono2 on February 10, 2009, 09:46:45 PM
Take a game developed for the PC and sell out to the 360 and PS3, releasing it before fully bugtesting.
Title: Re: Destroy A Game/Apparently Vent About Games You Were Disappointed By
Post by: .:DL:. on February 11, 2009, 12:53:10 AM
Take an already good game for the 360, add motion controls to it, change the title, and make it for the Wii.


::)