Agree or Disagree #1

[Max Headroom]

I disagree, but it is fun to look at a game with amazing next gen graphics! :3

If it's asthetically pleasing to you, it's art.

I never said it was asthetically pleasing to me...

fun to look at
asthetically pleasing


...semantics, semantics...

Um, that was sarcasm.

How do we know this?

Wat

How can we, the readers, identify the sarcasm you claim to be using?

[thunderhero4]

Um, by using your best judgement :P

[Max Headroom]

Um, by using your best judgement :P

Sarcasm not found.

[extraz]

Art is not supposed to be interactive....so no.

[jnfs2014]

I think that because the video game companies are expanding with new next-gen games, video games will be an art as well as entertainment.

[Zovistograt]

Art is not supposed to be interactive....so no.

That's the worst excuse I've heard, no offense D:

Art is not just paintings and the like.  Art is expression in media, and some media also happens to be interactive.  Interactivity means that you can actively take part in the expression of the creator, which actually would make it more engaging as an art form that painting and even film.

[jnfs2014]

Art is not supposed to be interactive....so no.

That's the worst excuse I've heard, no offense D:

Art is not just paintings and the like.  Art is expression in media, and some media also happens to be interactive.  Interactivity means that you can actively take part in the expression of the creator, which actually would make it more engaging as an art form that painting and even film.

pure win.

[Max Headroom]

Art is not supposed to be interactive....so no.

So? Paintings are technically interactive. It makes people talk to other people about the painting in question.