Main Menu

O lawl war is really, really expensive.

Started by Pokesamrus, January 11, 2008, 07:18:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Pokesamrus

Quote from: Kilroy on January 11, 2008, 07:37:43 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:34:44 PM
Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Would you rather we send over a poopty stealth bomber that gets blown up every time it's sent on a mission?
HAY GUYZ WE HAD MASTA CHEF YA NO!

WI CN SEND HIM IN TO KICK ASS

yeah

No.

Anyway.

Why don't we just build a Bomb Launcher?
why the intercourse  would you want someone in the navy to go in in air force field?

Tupin

Cost of a single Tomahawk Cruise Missle: $350,000.

Yay for Call of Duty 4.


Quote from: SkyMyl
Tuppy frightens me with his knowledge of legacy technology.

sleepin_dude_99

Quote from: Pokesamrus on January 11, 2008, 07:39:05 PM
Quote from: Kilroy on January 11, 2008, 07:37:43 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:34:44 PM
Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Would you rather we send over a poopty stealth bomber that gets blown up every time it's sent on a mission?
HAY GUYZ WE HAD MASTA CHEF YA NO!

WI CN SEND HIM IN TO KICK ASS

yeah

No.

Anyway.

Why don't we just build a Bomb Launcher?
why the intercourse  would you want someone in the navy to go in in air force field?
BECAUSE HE'S FUCKING AWESOME AND CAN DO ANYTHING

YEAH

No.

Totla

Quote from: Kilroy on January 11, 2008, 07:37:43 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:34:44 PM
Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Would you rather we send over a poopty stealth bomber that gets blown up every time it's sent on a mission?
HAY GUYZ WE HAD MASTA CHEF YA NO!

WI CN SEND HIM IN TO KICK ASS

yeah

No.

Anyway.

Why don't we just build a Bomb Launcher?
Yeah, lets use a sling-shot to send bombs overseas!
Quote from: Pokesamrus on January 11, 2008, 07:37:16 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
not really, even I expected them to only have 10 of them or less. misleading? bah, i got the fact from a random source and Call of Duty 4 (yah i is noob i died) and found it to be interesting.

i still don't think we need stealth bombers. im just saying war is gosh darn expensive.

and no im not an anti-military loser, I'll likely take ROTC courses and possibly join the military later on.
Why ten or less?

The B-2 is one of the most effective bombers we have. It can avoid detection by radar, has a very effective payload, and can go at super-sonic speeds. Most planes have one of those three.

JMV

why did totla call himself a dumbass earlier?
Boyah Forums | Join Boyah

sleepin_dude_99

Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:45:37 PM
Quote from: Kilroy on January 11, 2008, 07:37:43 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:34:44 PM
Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Would you rather we send over a poopty stealth bomber that gets blown up every time it's sent on a mission?
HAY GUYZ WE HAD MASTA CHEF YA NO!

WI CN SEND HIM IN TO KICK ASS

yeah

No.

Anyway.

Why don't we just build a Bomb Launcher?
Yeah, lets use a sling-shot to send bombs overseas!
Fuck yeah.


Can you just imagine that?


/fwoosh

"Bomb launched, sir!"

"Good! Let's wait!"

Appx. 2 hours later, somewhere in Iran...

translated into English

"What the hell is that little black spot in the air?"

"I dunno, it's getting bigger though..."

And so it got bigger...

And bigger...

AND BIGGER...

"Holy poop, it's a bomb!"

"OH SHI-"

/boom

Pokesamrus


Pokesamrus

Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:45:37 PM
Quote from: Kilroy on January 11, 2008, 07:37:43 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:34:44 PM
Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Would you rather we send over a poopty stealth bomber that gets blown up every time it's sent on a mission?
HAY GUYZ WE HAD MASTA CHEF YA NO!

WI CN SEND HIM IN TO KICK ASS

yeah

No.

Anyway.

Why don't we just build a Bomb Launcher?
Yeah, lets use a sling-shot to send bombs overseas!
Quote from: Pokesamrus on January 11, 2008, 07:37:16 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
not really, even I expected them to only have 10 of them or less. misleading? bah, i got the fact from a random source and Call of Duty 4 (yah i is noob i died) and found it to be interesting.

i still don't think we need stealth bombers. im just saying war is gosh darn expensive.

and no im not an anti-military loser, I'll likely take ROTC courses and possibly join the military later on.
Why ten or less?

The B-2 is one of the most effective bombers we have. It can avoid detection by radar, has a very effective payload, and can go at super-sonic speeds. Most planes have one of those three.
I just thought for a plane so expensive we would only need ten or less in reserve. Just an estimate

Pokesamrus

Quote from: Kilroy on January 11, 2008, 07:43:55 PM
Quote from: Pokesamrus on January 11, 2008, 07:39:05 PM
Quote from: Kilroy on January 11, 2008, 07:37:43 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:34:44 PM
Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Would you rather we send over a poopty stealth bomber that gets blown up every time it's sent on a mission?
HAY GUYZ WE HAD MASTA CHEF YA NO!

WI CN SEND HIM IN TO KICK ASS

yeah

No.

Anyway.

Why don't we just build a Bomb Launcher?
why the intercourse  would you want someone in the navy to go in in air force field?
BECAUSE HE'S FUCKING AWESOME AND CAN DO ANYTHING

YEAH

No.
MASTER CHIEF IS A RANK IN THE NAVY EQUIVALENT TO GENERAL I BELIEVE, IF YOU ARE REFERRING TO THE CHARACTER IN THE FICTIONAL HALO UNIVERSE THEN PLEASE USE THE FULL NAME MASTER CHIEF PETTY OFFICER JOHN-117.

Jono2


Quote from: LinkXLR on January 30, 2008, 09:10:54 PM
Quote from: famy on January 30, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
is big willy unleashed a will smith game

...I'm not even gonna touch this one.

SteamID: Lazylen

Tupin

Quote from: Jono2 on January 11, 2008, 07:54:24 PM
B-52s were used in like... WW2. :|
They still are workhorses.

Usually big bombers like that just get upgraded and not replaced.

It's fighter jets that are replaced like every 20 years.


Quote from: SkyMyl
Tuppy frightens me with his knowledge of legacy technology.

major tom

Quote from: Jono2 on January 11, 2008, 07:54:24 PM
B-52s were used in like... WW2. :|
Wow, you guys need to get your facts straight.

The B-52's started in the mid 70's.

Jono2

Quote from: Co-Z on January 11, 2008, 08:01:52 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on January 11, 2008, 07:54:24 PM
B-52s were used in like... WW2. :|
Wow, you guys need to get your facts straight.

The B-52's started in the mid 70's.

really?  oh...

Civ 4 mods aren't that accurate then. >_>

Quote from: LinkXLR on January 30, 2008, 09:10:54 PM
Quote from: famy on January 30, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
is big willy unleashed a will smith game

...I'm not even gonna touch this one.

SteamID: Lazylen

major tom

Quote from: Jono2 on January 11, 2008, 08:14:39 PM
really?  oh...

Civ 4 mods aren't that accurate then. >_>
Yeah, seriously.

Who the Hell would think Love Shack was made any time before the 80s?

Java

Quote from: Co-Z on January 11, 2008, 08:33:20 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on January 11, 2008, 08:14:39 PM
really?  oh...

Civ 4 mods aren't that accurate then. >_>
Yeah, seriously.

Who the Hell would think Love Shack was made any time before the 80s?
I'm gonna listen to that song now...