Main Menu

O lawl war is really, really expensive.

Started by Pokesamrus, January 11, 2008, 07:18:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Pokesamrus

Cost of a single B-2 Bomber: $2.2 billion dollars
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-2_bomber

What's your thoughts of how much this stuff costs and if it's going to waste. AND WHERE IS THIS MONEY COMING FROM ANYWAYS- TAXES?!


im no hippy i'm pro meaningful wars, but also we shouldn't be in war now, we should be improving the US.

major tom

They should just get B-52's.

BAAAAAANG BAAAAAANG!
BAAAAAANG BAAAAAANG!
BAAAAAANG BAAAAAANG!


Helios


Pokesamrus

Quote from: Helios on January 11, 2008, 07:27:00 PM
Quote from: WIIGAMER24 on January 11, 2008, 07:25:10 PM
WHERE THE f*** DOES THE US GET THAT MUCH MONEY FROM? :|

Taxes.
too many people in the US :|

and why can't we just borrow canada's planes, they don't need them at all

Totla

#5
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.

bluaki

Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.

major tom

Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Yeah, and I'll repeat what I said- it's cheaper and easier to use B-52's.

ROCK LOBSTAH!
ROCK LOBSTAH!
ROCK LOBSTAH!

Totla

Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Would you rather we send over a poopty stealth bomber that gets blown up every time it's sent on a mission?

Totla

#9
Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Would you rather we send over a poopty stealth bomber that gets blown up every time it's sent on a mission?
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:34:44 PM
Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Would you rather we send over a poopty stealth bomber that gets blown up every time it's sent on a mission?
Dumbass. B-2's are stealth bombers. Emphasis on STEALTH. B-52's are incredibility to detect, seeing how they're huge and round. Learn about a subject before you try and argue it.

JMV

Quote from: WIIGAMER24 on January 11, 2008, 07:25:10 PM
WHERE THE FUCK DOES THE US GET THAT MUCH MONEY FROM? :|
drug deals with the cartels
Boyah Forums | Join Boyah

Pokesamrus

Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
not really, even I expected them to only have 10 of them or less. misleading? bah, i got the fact from a random source and Call of Duty 4 (yah i is noob i died) and found it to be interesting.

i still don't think we need stealth bombers. im just saying war is gosh darn expensive.

and no im not an anti-military loser, I'll likely take ROTC courses and possibly join the military later on.

Tahrann

Puts the lotion on the skin or it gets the hose again!

sleepin_dude_99

Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:34:44 PM
Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Would you rather we send over a poopty stealth bomber that gets blown up every time it's sent on a mission?
HAY GUYZ WE HAD MASTA CHEF YA NO!

WI CN SEND HIM IN TO KICK ASS

yeah

No.

Anyway.

Why don't we just build a Bomb Launcher?

JMV

Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:36:17 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:34:44 PM
Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Would you rather we send over a poopty stealth bomber that gets blown up every time it's sent on a mission?
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:34:44 PM
Quote from: bluaki on January 11, 2008, 07:32:57 PM
Quote from: Totla on January 11, 2008, 07:28:52 PM
They only made 21 of those. And it's the best stealth bomber we have, what do you expect?
They haven't made any more in years, too. Good job being misleading.
46.2 billion dollars on 21 planes? still WAY too much.
Would you rather we send over a poopty stealth bomber that gets blown up every time it's sent on a mission?
Dumbass. B-2's are stealth bombers. Emphasis on STEALTH. B-52's are incredibility to detect, seeing how they're huge and round. Learn about a subject before you try and argue it.
you got served.
Boyah Forums | Join Boyah