Main Menu

If you lost 10% on your english mark because of how stupidly the exam was made..

Started by Jono2, January 24, 2008, 02:45:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jono2

Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:11:12 PM
I love how you blame a piece of paper for you're lack of smarts.

lol, you dumbass :|


The markers for the exam were stupid.

First question on the exam:

What questions would you ask the teachers from this article? - 5 marks

I listed 5 questions and overflowed the paper.

and didn't get 5 marks.

I WOULD ASK THEM THOSE QUESTIONS.

the fact that the exam was complete and utter BULLSHIT and that EVERYBODY FELL FROM THE EXAM means it was marked too FUCKING HARD.

NOBODY'S MARKS BENEFITTED.  I STUDIED MY ASS OFF.

in the class previous ours, 67% OF THE CLASS FAILED THE EXAM.

my friend who had a 97 GOT 61.

then my other friend who had a 97 got a 66.

my best friend got a 74 when his term mark was 95.


EVERYONE IS BITCHING ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT WAS A FUCKING STUPID EXAM.



I'm BITCHING about it because prior to writing it I ACTUALLY HAD A SHOT AT HONOR ROLL.

Quote from: LinkXLR on January 30, 2008, 09:10:54 PM
Quote from: famy on January 30, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
is big willy unleashed a will smith game

...I'm not even gonna touch this one.

SteamID: Lazylen

not famy

Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:24:16 PM
1. Dumbasses don't use effort.
2. Effort doesn't do anything. You can put in all the effort in the world and still fail.
two is somewhat true, but just because im stupid doesn't mean im not trying you big meanie poop face

WiinolikePS3

Quote from: Jono2 on January 24, 2008, 05:25:08 PM
Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:11:12 PM
I love how you blame a piece of paper for you're lack of smarts.

lol, you dumbass :|


The markers for the exam were stupid.

First question on the exam:

What questions would you ask the teachers from this article? - 5 marks

I listed 5 questions and overflowed the paper.

and didn't get 5 marks.

I WOULD ASK THEM THOSE QUESTIONS.

the fact that the exam was complete and utter BULLs*** and that EVERYBODY FELL FROM THE EXAM means it was marked too f***ING HARD.

NOBODY'S MARKS BENEFITTED.  I STUDIED MY ASS OFF.

in the class previous ours, 67% OF THE CLASS FAILED THE EXAM.

my friend who had a 97 GOT 61.

then my other friend who had a 97 got a 66.

my best friend got a 74 when his term mark was 95.


EVERYONE IS b***ing ABOUT IT BECAUSE IT WAS A f***ING STUPID EXAM.



I'm b***ing about it because prior to writing it I ACTUALLY HAD A SHOT AT HONOR ROLL.
Ouch.


Where we go to school, more than 50% of the students are on the Honor Roll, and about 15% on the High Honor Roll.

Honor Roll isn't that big here.  :P

WiinolikePS3

Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:24:16 PM
Quote from: WiinolikePS3 on January 24, 2008, 05:14:01 PM
Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:11:12 PM
I love how you blame a piece of paper for you're lack of smarts Effort.
Grades are ALL about effort.

The guy next to me in Science is a total dumbass, yet he has a better grade than me. Why?

He studies his ass off, and I don't. Now, don't get me wrong, I still have a solid A in the class, but he has an A+, because he overstudies.

He got 100% on the Science exam compared to my 98. Had I studied at all, I would've had a 100 too, but no. I don't study. Our school system is corrupt, in many, many ways.
1. Dumbasses don't use effort.
2. Effort doesn't do anything. You can put in all the effort in the world and still fail.

What I mean by Effort is STUDYING.

That's what effort IS. No matter how stupid you are, unless you have a mental illness, if you study well and hard enough, you'll get amazing grades.

That's what school is based on, and there's no way around it. The only benefits smart people have at school are that they don't have to study as much, and they'll probably get better grades.

Just because you're naturally stupid doesn't mean you can't turn it around by working hard.

Mystic

Quote from: WiinolikePS3 on January 24, 2008, 05:29:07 PM
Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:24:16 PM
Quote from: WiinolikePS3 on January 24, 2008, 05:14:01 PM
Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:11:12 PM
I love how you blame a piece of paper for you're lack of smarts Effort.
Grades are ALL about effort.

The guy next to me in Science is a total dumbass, yet he has a better grade than me. Why?

He studies his ass off, and I don't. Now, don't get me wrong, I still have a solid A in the class, but he has an A+, because he overstudies.

He got 100% on the Science exam compared to my 98. Had I studied at all, I would've had a 100 too, but no. I don't study. Our school system is corrupt, in many, many ways.
1. Dumbasses don't use effort.
2. Effort doesn't do anything. You can put in all the effort in the world and still fail.

What I mean by Effort is STUDYING.

That's what effort IS. No matter how stupid you are, unless you have a mental illness, if you study well and hard enough, you'll get amazing grades.

That's what school is based on, and there's no way around it. The only benefits smart people have at school are that they don't have to study as much, and they'll probably get better grades.

Just because you're naturally stupid doesn't mean you can't turn it around by working hard.
But a naturally stupid person wouldn't study. That;s why they're stupid -_-

Jono2

Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:31:17 PM
Quote from: WiinolikePS3 on January 24, 2008, 05:29:07 PM
Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:24:16 PM
Quote from: WiinolikePS3 on January 24, 2008, 05:14:01 PM
Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:11:12 PM
I love how you blame a piece of paper for you're lack of smarts Effort.
Grades are ALL about effort.

The guy next to me in Science is a total dumbass, yet he has a better grade than me. Why?

He studies his ass off, and I don't. Now, don't get me wrong, I still have a solid A in the class, but he has an A+, because he overstudies.

He got 100% on the Science exam compared to my 98. Had I studied at all, I would've had a 100 too, but no. I don't study. Our school system is corrupt, in many, many ways.
1. Dumbasses don't use effort.
2. Effort doesn't do anything. You can put in all the effort in the world and still fail.

What I mean by Effort is STUDYING.

That's what effort IS. No matter how stupid you are, unless you have a mental illness, if you study well and hard enough, you'll get amazing grades.

That's what school is based on, and there's no way around it. The only benefits smart people have at school are that they don't have to study as much, and they'll probably get better grades.

Just because you're naturally stupid doesn't mean you can't turn it around by working hard.
But a naturally stupid person wouldn't study. That;s why they're stupid -_-

a naturally stupid person who studies hard will never be as smart as a naturally smart person.

Quote from: LinkXLR on January 30, 2008, 09:10:54 PM
Quote from: famy on January 30, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
is big willy unleashed a will smith game

...I'm not even gonna touch this one.

SteamID: Lazylen

WiinolikePS3

Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:31:17 PM
Quote from: WiinolikePS3 on January 24, 2008, 05:29:07 PM
Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:24:16 PM
Quote from: WiinolikePS3 on January 24, 2008, 05:14:01 PM
Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:11:12 PM
I love how you blame a piece of paper for you're lack of smarts Effort.
Grades are ALL about effort.

The guy next to me in Science is a total dumbass, yet he has a better grade than me. Why?

He studies his ass off, and I don't. Now, don't get me wrong, I still have a solid A in the class, but he has an A+, because he overstudies.

He got 100% on the Science exam compared to my 98. Had I studied at all, I would've had a 100 too, but no. I don't study. Our school system is corrupt, in many, many ways.
1. Dumbasses don't use effort.
2. Effort doesn't do anything. You can put in all the effort in the world and still fail.

What I mean by Effort is STUDYING.

That's what effort IS. No matter how stupid you are, unless you have a mental illness, if you study well and hard enough, you'll get amazing grades.

That's what school is based on, and there's no way around it. The only benefits smart people have at school are that they don't have to study as much, and they'll probably get better grades.

Just because you're naturally stupid doesn't mean you can't turn it around by working hard.
But a naturally stupid person wouldn't study. That;s why they're stupid -_-
????

WiinolikePS3

Quote from: Jono2 on January 24, 2008, 05:33:57 PM
Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:31:17 PM
Quote from: WiinolikePS3 on January 24, 2008, 05:29:07 PM
Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:24:16 PM
Quote from: WiinolikePS3 on January 24, 2008, 05:14:01 PM
Quote from: Mystic Swampert on January 24, 2008, 05:11:12 PM
I love how you blame a piece of paper for you're lack of smarts Effort.
Grades are ALL about effort.

The guy next to me in Science is a total dumbass, yet he has a better grade than me. Why?

He studies his ass off, and I don't. Now, don't get me wrong, I still have a solid A in the class, but he has an A+, because he overstudies.

He got 100% on the Science exam compared to my 98. Had I studied at all, I would've had a 100 too, but no. I don't study. Our school system is corrupt, in many, many ways.
1. Dumbasses don't use effort.
2. Effort doesn't do anything. You can put in all the effort in the world and still fail.

What I mean by Effort is STUDYING.

That's what effort IS. No matter how stupid you are, unless you have a mental illness, if you study well and hard enough, you'll get amazing grades.

That's what school is based on, and there's no way around it. The only benefits smart people have at school are that they don't have to study as much, and they'll probably get better grades.

Just because you're naturally stupid doesn't mean you can't turn it around by working hard.
But a naturally stupid person wouldn't study. That;s why they're stupid -_-

a naturally stupid person who studies hard will never be as smart as a naturally smart person.
Exactly what I mean.

What I'm saying is, he has better grades, but that doesn't mean he's smarter than me AT ALL.

Chain Chompesque

Just beat whoever made the exam over the head. With a giant tuna.
To be seen, stand up. To be heard, speak up. To be appreciated, shut up.
Also, you can't spell slaughter without laughter!

Join the Mushroom Kingdom wars!

Join the Pikmin wars!

Dumple Land! <-Click this one.
Labor! I said labor, dang it!
Time for transport!

Jono2

Quote from: Chain Chompesque on January 24, 2008, 05:47:15 PM
Just beat whoever made the exam over the head. With a giant tuna.

it was a provincial exam... there was no one person...


67% of the PROVINCE FAILED.

Quote from: LinkXLR on January 30, 2008, 09:10:54 PM
Quote from: famy on January 30, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
is big willy unleashed a will smith game

...I'm not even gonna touch this one.

SteamID: Lazylen


Shujinco2


Jono2

Quote from: Shujinco on January 24, 2008, 10:15:00 PM
This sounds awesome.

SO, how exactly WAS the test so stupid?

1.  The questions didn't apply to most of the stories that went along with them.  Manitoba Provincial exams usually have generally the same questions, but swapped stories.

2.  A teacher in Winnipeg leaked the topic of the exam (Fairness was the topic :|) to their students, and was subsequently fired, but since they leaked the topic, it screwed with everybody's marks in the province.

3.  The topic was "Fairness".  Far too broad.  Apparently Justice has nothing to do with fairness, but Pity & Generosity do.  Part of the reason my mark was so low.  I wrote on Justice, but apparently they didn't like that.

4.  The stories weren't about fairness, they were about being kind to people less fortunate, or they were basically "what the intercourse " stories.  An example of this was a story of a man who's wife had died, and he went to the graveyard, when all of the sudden the dead rose from their graves and wrote on their gravestones why they had really died, and his wife wrote that the reason she died from a cold was because she had gone out to cheat on him.  Didn't apply to "Fairness" in enough ways to warrant a whole page's worth of writing.

5.  Not enough substance.  the questions on the first day lacked any sort of suitable depth.  they were all "This is a homeless/disabled person, i was mean to them, I have seen my wrongdoings" sorts of stories, and since they were all exactly the same, you ran out of things to say on the exam without reiterating yourself time and time again.

6.  The time given for writing our major piece (article/short story/poem, etc) was far too short.  In order to get something with any substance or ideas whatsoever, you need more time than 3 hours.  I was planned out prior to writing on these days, and I still needed a bit of extra time (5 minutes, less than that) to finish.

7.  You were marked wrong on opinion-based questions.


I'm too tired to list more.  goodnight.

Quote from: LinkXLR on January 30, 2008, 09:10:54 PM
Quote from: famy on January 30, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
is big willy unleashed a will smith game

...I'm not even gonna touch this one.

SteamID: Lazylen

OneManFreakShow

Quote from: Jono2 on January 24, 2008, 10:22:13 PM
Quote from: Shujinco on January 24, 2008, 10:15:00 PM
This sounds awesome.

SO, how exactly WAS the test so stupid?

1.  The questions didn't apply to most of the stories that went along with them.  Manitoba Provincial exams usually have generally the same questions, but swapped stories.

2.  A teacher in Winnipeg leaked the topic of the exam (Fairness was the topic :|) to their students, and was subsequently fired, but since they leaked the topic, it screwed with everybody's marks in the province.

3.  The topic was "Fairness".  Far too broad.  Apparently Justice has nothing to do with fairness, but Pity & Generosity do.  Part of the reason my mark was so low.  I wrote on Justice, but apparently they didn't like that.

4.  The stories weren't about fairness, they were about being kind to people less fortunate, or they were basically "what the f***" stories.  An example of this was a story of a man who's wife had died, and he went to the graveyard, when all of the sudden the dead rose from their graves and wrote on their gravestones why they had really died, and his wife wrote that the reason she died from a cold was because she had gone out to cheat on him.  Didn't apply to "Fairness" in enough ways to warrant a whole page's worth of writing.

5.  Not enough substance.  the questions on the first day lacked any sort of suitable depth.  they were all "This is a homeless/disabled person, i was mean to them, I have seen my wrongdoings" sorts of stories, and since they were all exactly the same, you ran out of things to say on the exam without reiterating yourself time and time again.

6.  The time given for writing our major piece (article/short story/poem, etc) was far too short.  In order to get something with any substance or ideas whatsoever, you need more time than 3 hours.  I was planned out prior to writing on these days, and I still needed a bit of extra time (5 minutes, less than that) to finish.

7.  You were marked wrong on opinion-based questions.


I'm too tired to list more.  goodnight.

I lol'd at the story about the dead wife. Hard.

Mystic