Main Menu

Omama or Mclame?

Started by THEBIRD, June 11, 2008, 11:40:11 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Obama or McKain?

Barack Obama
9 (50%)
John Mccain
5 (27.8%)
Bring back Hilary
1 (5.6%)
Bring back [Other]
3 (16.7%)

Total Members Voted: 17

THEBIRD

So, Omama or McLame? Or would you rather Clinton came back (yes, I thought up a name for her as well. I think I'd be offended too many people if I used it, though.)? Honestly, I've been waiting for Barack Obama to beat out Hilary for a long time. I'm glad he finally has, and I'm just waiting for him to outrun the old guy and win presidency.

...If he's not assassinated first >_>...

And you can just ignore the play on their last names... I got bored, and just felt like doing it. It doesn't mean I hate either one or the other. I'm pretty indifferent on all the other candidates besides Barack, who I want to win. Deal with it.

Tupin

In before Ron Paul.

Also, Barack would have the secret service protect him 24/7 if he was elected.

After Hilary conceited, some people said they wouldn't vote for anyone.

Expect McCain to be our next president, serve two terms, and then die a year later.


Quote from: SkyMyl
Tuppy frightens me with his knowledge of legacy technology.

Totla


Kilroy

Which one seems less corrupt?
1984 WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN INSTRUCTION NOT MANUAL
"yes you are anusface, but i am better than!!" - taw, steam forums
 FOR NSF MASCOT

Tupin

#4
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Well, McCain hasn't had one earmark in twenty years of being a politician.

Which means he hasn't attached something frivolous to an existing bill to pass it.

But of course, he sees the war going on for a while.

Edit: Damn, I brought the McCain ads to this thread. >_>


Quote from: SkyMyl
Tuppy frightens me with his knowledge of legacy technology.

Kilroy

Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 11:48:32 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Well, McCain hasn't had one earmark in twenty years of being a politician.

Which means he hasn't attached something frivolous to an existing bill to pass it.

But of course, he sees the war going on for a while.

Edit: Damn, I brought the McCain ads to this thread. >_>

lol

I don't really pay attention to politics. I don't give a crap about government, all I can really say is that 99.99% of them are corrupt bastards.
1984 WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN INSTRUCTION NOT MANUAL
"yes you are anusface, but i am better than!!" - taw, steam forums
 FOR NSF MASCOT

Totla

Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Obama wants to raise taxes and wants to spend an additional 1 trillion dollars on mostly useless stuff.
He also wants to tax oil companies even though the government gets 15% of profits from gas, and the oil companies only get 4%.
He's also a n_gger. :B

Tupin

Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:51:56 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 11:48:32 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Well, McCain hasn't had one earmark in twenty years of being a politician.

Which means he hasn't attached something frivolous to an existing bill to pass it.

But of course, he sees the war going on for a while.

Edit: Damn, I brought the McCain ads to this thread. >_>

lol

I don't really pay attention to politics. I don't give a crap about government, all I can really say is that 99.99% of them are corrupt bastards.
You really should start caring.

One of those men will become President of America.


Quote from: SkyMyl
Tuppy frightens me with his knowledge of legacy technology.

Gwen Khan

#8
they are both awful, but if I have to chose I pick Obama, at least he's better then romney

Tupin

Quote from: Totla on June 11, 2008, 11:54:48 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Obama wants to raise taxes and wants to spend an additional 1 trillion dollars on mostly useless stuff.
He also wants to tax oil companies even though the government gets 15% of profits from gas, and the oil companies only get 4%.
He's also a n_gger. :B
Don't tell me you wouldn't vote for him because he's black.


Quote from: SkyMyl
Tuppy frightens me with his knowledge of legacy technology.

Totla

Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 11:57:32 AM
Quote from: Totla on June 11, 2008, 11:54:48 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Obama wants to raise taxes and wants to spend an additional 1 trillion dollars on mostly useless stuff.
He also wants to tax oil companies even though the government gets 15% of profits from gas, and the oil companies only get 4%.
He's also a n_gger. :B
Don't tell me you wouldn't vote for him because he's black.
It was a joke.

Tupin

Quote from: Totla on June 11, 2008, 11:58:27 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 11:57:32 AM
Quote from: Totla on June 11, 2008, 11:54:48 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Obama wants to raise taxes and wants to spend an additional 1 trillion dollars on mostly useless stuff.
He also wants to tax oil companies even though the government gets 15% of profits from gas, and the oil companies only get 4%.
He's also a n_gger. :B
Don't tell me you wouldn't vote for him because he's black.
It was a joke.
Ah.


Quote from: SkyMyl
Tuppy frightens me with his knowledge of legacy technology.

Kilroy

Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 11:55:59 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:51:56 AM
Quote from: Tuppyluver1 on June 11, 2008, 11:48:32 AM
Quote from: Byte on June 11, 2008, 11:45:26 AM
Which one seems less corrupt?
Well, McCain hasn't had one earmark in twenty years of being a politician.

Which means he hasn't attached something frivolous to an existing bill to pass it.

But of course, he sees the war going on for a while.

Edit: Damn, I brought the McCain ads to this thread. >_>

lol

I don't really pay attention to politics. I don't give a crap about government, all I can really say is that 99.99% of them are corrupt bastards.
You really should start caring.

One of those men will become President of America.
I'm also moving to another country when I get older. I understand I should care for the next 10-15 years, but after that I'm either moving to Canada or Japan, depending on my job.
1984 WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN INSTRUCTION NOT MANUAL
"yes you are anusface, but i am better than!!" - taw, steam forums
 FOR NSF MASCOT

Triforceman22

Don't really care right now, seeing as i'm canadian...

but I guess MCcain...


QuoteRobotnik: GET A LOAD OF THIS!!!!!!!!

THEBIRD

All the fossil fuels in the world are going to be gone within the next 100 years, so I don't care what they do about the oil and gas. It won't last, no matter what. I'm just waiting until the government finally gets a intercourse ing brain and starts giving us the incentives to go green.