Main Menu

Thoughts on Third Parties?

Started by Macawmoses, June 28, 2008, 01:27:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Macawmoses

What are your thoughts on them?

If any of you recall, I was at NSider, and still, to this today, a Nintendo Purist when it comes to Smash. I hate third parties in a game like this...but what are YOUR thoughts?

jnfs2014

A fun addition but hardly worthwhile for hardcore SSB players.

Cornwad

I think 3rd parties are fine as long as they keep them they way they are in Brawl. I think they still represented the 3rd parties while still making Brawl feel like a Nintendo game. I think 3rd parties only deserve one stage and one AT at most, which is just what Brawl did.

SkyMyl

I lost twelve thousand dollars when Sonic was revealed to be in Brawl.
I was :O :| ;D ???? when Snake was announced.


Honestly, for me it depends on the characters themselves.

CommanderFlint

SNAKE>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Sonic

MG/MGS/MGA :p rules yo.

Thirdkoopa

Me with third parties? I don't really mind. It's a good way of expansion in characters. Brawl's were ok, 2 fit well (I like playing as sonic for lulz but I can't use snake well D; ) As for future smash games; I wonder what third parties they'll do next, but I'm not expecting a lot due to copyrights. *Hopes they get geno's copyright for smash 4 but doubts it*
[21:11] <mackormoses> let's take a look at today's stats
[21:11] <Rosencrantz> stats today are high
[21:11] <mackormoses> holy intercourse ing poop
[21:11] <Rosencrantz> you adding all these standards
[21:11] <Rosencrantz> is really pushing us [/quote]
Quote from: JrDude φ on May 31, 2010, 08:32:13 PM
3 of my friends smoke weed. Why? Well I asked one time, and this is what they said: "Because I can blow out smoke and it makes me feel like a intercourse ing dragon"

JrDude

I like them, but I think it would be better if they weren't in.
[move][/move]
Dude .

Nayrman

Well, since two of my three mains are third party I think you know my stance.
As long as they aren't absurd characters I think they're a wonderful idea.
Example good: Bomberman, Sonic, Megaman, Snake...guys who are IMPORTANT, have good games, and genuinely appear on Nintendo
Example bad: Cloud, Sora, Crash... Guys who do almost nothing for Nintendo or are completely overhyped beyond belief (CLOUD!)

CommanderFlint

lol I remember people wanting Sora. xD

lol

CommanderFlint

Snake didn't do much for Nintendo except to crappy remakes, but I guess it makes up for it by Konami being with Nintendo for a while.

Red

#10
Meh. I couldn't care less about them, but I don't mind them.

Java

I didn't mind that they were in the game. I actually like them.

I still think Mega Man should have gotten in...

mario59


1. Im back! like anyone cares i, have been posting that on my regular boards to get it out of my system.
2. i agree with mack I really do think it should an all nintendo thing
Betrayal, even unwilling, will sometimes be forgiven, but oftentimes the friendship will never heal, and the lost trust will never be regained.



Sig by Star.

SSBB FC: 2664-3293-2320

Doodle

I don't really care that much. I think Sonic and Snake were good choices. Don't really like to use any of them though. :P
YEAH

Apollo

some third parties i think should be in
for instance sonic and tails
i say no to snake
but i also think characters like rayman and megaman have ok shots