Main Menu

Brawl official tier list v 1.0

Started by Dawei, September 01, 2008, 02:52:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

DededeCloneChris

Quote from: JrDude on September 22, 2008, 01:06:23 AM
Quote from: wiiboychris on September 20, 2008, 09:37:36 PM
Quote from: QingXin on September 20, 2008, 12:01:03 PM
There's a reason I never use Metaknight... I just think it requires no skill to play as him. He is overly broken, despite his light weight.

Attacks are blindingly quick, has insane killers, has a multi jump, the ability to glide twice, small body, and such high priority :| :|

*disappears for another month*
And that's why you used him on Playat's match...
Wow, I didn't know that using a character in a single match meant anything.
"never" is an exaggeration genius.
It's called "irony."

JrDude

Quote from: wiiboychris on September 22, 2008, 10:20:46 PM
Quote from: JrDude on September 22, 2008, 01:06:23 AM
Quote from: wiiboychris on September 20, 2008, 09:37:36 PM
Quote from: QingXin on September 20, 2008, 12:01:03 PM
There's a reason I never use Metaknight... I just think it requires no skill to play as him. He is overly broken, despite his light weight.

Attacks are blindingly quick, has insane killers, has a multi jump, the ability to glide twice, small body, and such high priority :| :|

*disappears for another month*
And that's why you used him on Playat's match...
Wow, I didn't know that using a character in a single match meant anything.
"never" is an exaggeration genius.
It's called "irony."
What you used was irony, but what I was talking about is an exaggeration, like saying "I did ____ a million times"
[move][/move]
Dude .

Mutilator7

I agree with the top and high tiers mostly, but some low tier characters should be bumped up.

HTA!

Quote from: Mutilator7 on November 02, 2008, 07:09:00 AM
I agree with the top and high tiers mostly, but some low tier characters should be bumped up.
That would entail bumping some higher characters down.
So, if a character is low on the list tourney players must prove that they are better than the characters above them...
And for some that's going to be near impossible.

Mutilator7

Quote from: HTA on November 02, 2008, 08:45:46 AM
Quote from: Mutilator7 on November 02, 2008, 07:09:00 AM
I agree with the top and high tiers mostly, but some low tier characters should be bumped up.
That would entail bumping some higher characters down.
So, if a character is low on the list tourney players must prove that they are better than the characters above them...
And for some that's going to be near impossible.

The longer the game is out and the characters being tested longer the more accurate the tier list will become.

HTA!

Quote from: Mutilator7 on November 07, 2008, 05:52:30 PM
Quote from: HTA on November 02, 2008, 08:45:46 AM
Quote from: Mutilator7 on November 02, 2008, 07:09:00 AM
I agree with the top and high tiers mostly, but some low tier characters should be bumped up.
That would entail bumping some higher characters down.
So, if a character is low on the list tourney players must prove that they are better than the characters above them...
And for some that's going to be near impossible.

The longer the game is out and the characters being tested longer the more accurate the tier list will become.
Brawls seems to have... less depth than Melee... but we'll see.

Nayrman

Quote from: HTA on November 08, 2008, 07:57:17 AM
Quote from: Mutilator7 on November 07, 2008, 05:52:30 PM
Quote from: HTA on November 02, 2008, 08:45:46 AM
Quote from: Mutilator7 on November 02, 2008, 07:09:00 AM
I agree with the top and high tiers mostly, but some low tier characters should be bumped up.
That would entail bumping some higher characters down.
So, if a character is low on the list tourney players must prove that they are better than the characters above them...
And for some that's going to be near impossible.

The longer the game is out and the characters being tested longer the more accurate the tier list will become.
Brawls seems to have... less depth than Melee... but we'll see.
cuz Nintendo has to make EVERYTHING "more accessable". Which I'm sure is code for taking all the cool stuff out of it and making the game playable with two buttons so even babies and old people can play it

DededeCloneChris

Quote from: Nayrman on November 08, 2008, 08:19:40 AM
Quote from: HTA on November 08, 2008, 07:57:17 AM
Quote from: Mutilator7 on November 07, 2008, 05:52:30 PM
Quote from: HTA on November 02, 2008, 08:45:46 AM
Quote from: Mutilator7 on November 02, 2008, 07:09:00 AM
I agree with the top and high tiers mostly, but some low tier characters should be bumped up.
That would entail bumping some higher characters down.
So, if a character is low on the list tourney players must prove that they are better than the characters above them...
And for some that's going to be near impossible.

The longer the game is out and the characters being tested longer the more accurate the tier list will become.
Brawls seems to have... less depth than Melee... but we'll see.
cuz Nintendo has to make EVERYTHING "more accessable". Which I'm sure is code for taking all the cool stuff out of it and making the game playable with two buttons so even babies and old people can play it
Er...I don't think so.

Mutilator7

Quote from: wiiboychris on November 08, 2008, 09:12:57 AM
Quote from: Nayrman on November 08, 2008, 08:19:40 AM
Quote from: HTA on November 08, 2008, 07:57:17 AM
Quote from: Mutilator7 on November 07, 2008, 05:52:30 PM
Quote from: HTA on November 02, 2008, 08:45:46 AM
Quote from: Mutilator7 on November 02, 2008, 07:09:00 AM
I agree with the top and high tiers mostly, but some low tier characters should be bumped up.
That would entail bumping some higher characters down.
So, if a character is low on the list tourney players must prove that they are better than the characters above them...
And for some that's going to be near impossible.

The longer the game is out and the characters being tested longer the more accurate the tier list will become.
Brawls seems to have... less depth than Melee... but we'll see.
cuz Nintendo has to make EVERYTHING "more accessable". Which I'm sure is code for taking all the cool stuff out of it and making the game playable with two buttons so even babies and old people can play it
Er...I don't think so.

I see what you're trying to say, but they only do that with games like wii music and wii sports, Brawl wasn't intended for babies or old people.

FruitFlow

#84
The one question that will puzzle me for eternity.
How on earth did Toon Link rule over Link.  >_>


Also, I'm not sure if I was seeing things, but wasn't Ike Low and Yoshi High?
"Many people see technology as the problem behind the so-called digital divide. Others see it as the solution. Technology is neither. It must operate in conjunction with business, economic, political and social system."

HTA!

Quote from: SSBBRAWLIN on December 10, 2008, 04:45:57 PM
The one question that will puzzle me for eternity.
How on earth did Toon Link rule over Link.  >_>
Boomerang. :)

Nayrman

Quote from: HTA on December 10, 2008, 04:47:25 PM
Quote from: SSBBRAWLIN on December 10, 2008, 04:45:57 PM
The one question that will puzzle me for eternity.
How on earth did Toon Link rule over Link.  >_>
Boomerang. :)
and meteor, and better recovery (even tho he is "countered" by lightness), and a faster arial game that easliy trounces Link's...

FruitFlow

Quote from: HTA on December 10, 2008, 04:47:25 PM
Quote from: SSBBRAWLIN on December 10, 2008, 04:45:57 PM
The one question that will puzzle me for eternity.
How on earth did Toon Link rule over Link.  >_>
Boomerang. :)
That puzzles me even more.  :O

- Short range
- Low power

The only thing that I see about it that's better than Link's is that it damages as it returns to TL. :P
"Many people see technology as the problem behind the so-called digital divide. Others see it as the solution. Technology is neither. It must operate in conjunction with business, economic, political and social system."

Nayrman

Quote from: SSBBRAWLIN on December 10, 2008, 04:51:59 PM
Quote from: HTA on December 10, 2008, 04:47:25 PM
Quote from: SSBBRAWLIN on December 10, 2008, 04:45:57 PM
The one question that will puzzle me for eternity.
How on earth did Toon Link rule over Link.  >_>
Boomerang. :)
That puzzles me even more.  :O

- Short range
- Low power

The only thing that I see about it that's better than Link's is that it damages as it returns to TL. :P
wider hitboxes and does damage returning. The no damange but movement for Link's only hurts Link...

FruitFlow

#89
Quote from: Nayrman on December 10, 2008, 04:49:26 PM
Quote from: HTA on December 10, 2008, 04:47:25 PM
Quote from: SSBBRAWLIN on December 10, 2008, 04:45:57 PM
The one question that will puzzle me for eternity.
How on earth did Toon Link rule over Link.  >_>
Boomerang. :)
and meteor, and better recovery (even tho he is "countered" by lightness), and a faster arial game that easliy trounces Link's...
But that's one of the hazards of SD. You'd have to be 100% sure that you'll even land the hit.

I agree with you on the recovery though. He goes higher and farther than Link. Mainly due to his light weighted self.
"Many people see technology as the problem behind the so-called digital divide. Others see it as the solution. Technology is neither. It must operate in conjunction with business, economic, political and social system."