Everybody on this forum is a three on the Kinsey scale.

[ME86]

Why? Because I say so.

[yes.derek]

<sup>Nevermind, Wikipedia helped me.

I actually consider myself either a 0 or 1.</sup>

[ME86]

Why? Because I say so.

So half-homosexual/homosexual?

No. :|

You people prefer to be called 'bisexual' :|

[Rius]

You fool, how dare you rate me a 3. >:(


I'm at least a 13.

[Silverhawk79]

Rating   Description
0   Exclusively heterosexual
1   Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2   Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3   Equally heterosexual and homosexual
4   Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5   Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6   Exclusively homosexual
X   Asexual

[ME86]

Why? Because I say so.

So half-homosexual/homosexual?

No. :|

You people prefer to be called 'bisexual' :|

No.

I do declare, you seem to be in denial.

[Bowser81889]

This confused me at first, but then I figured it out after Silver posted that chart.

Coincidentally, it seems as though ME holds a valid point.  Definitely can't argue there.

[bluaki]

I'm a 6 ^_^

[Rius]

I'm a 6 ^_^

...

[bluaki]

I'm a 6 ^_^

...

What?

[Jono2]

I'm an X, thank you very much.

[Rayquarian]

You wish.
I'm a 0.
Yo' mama is a X.

[Logheck]

I'm a zero ;D

[Bowser81889]

Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic.  I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories.  But that can't be right.  I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys.  I just don't see how that's possible.  Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females.  So how does this logic actually validate itself?  Seriously. 

If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so.  Until then, I stand.

[Logheck]

Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic.  I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories.  But that can't be right.  I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys.  I just don't see how that's possible.  Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females.  So how does this logic actually validate itself?  Seriously. 

If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so.  Until then, I stand.

There IS no logic, this is a joke thread ;D