Main Menu

Everybody on this forum is a three on the Kinsey scale.

Started by ME86, November 13, 2007, 07:36:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bowser81889

Quote from: Logheck on November 13, 2007, 08:33:04 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic.  I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories.  But that can't be right.  I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys.  I just don't see how that's possible.  Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females.  So how does this logic actually validate itself?  Seriously. 

If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so.  Until then, I stand.

There IS no logic, this is a joke thread ;D

Ah, okay. :P 

...̅̅̅

bluaki


Bowser81889

Quote from: bluaki on November 13, 2007, 08:43:23 PM
Quote from: LiveOnTheEdge on November 13, 2007, 08:40:53 PM
wth is a three?
A completely bisexual person with equal preference in both genders.
I was wondering what the heck that meant.  Only thing is, I doubt most people on here are threes. :P

JMV

Boyah Forums | Join Boyah

bluaki

Quote from: JMV290 on November 13, 2007, 08:46:03 PM
quizfarm said im a zero
I'd say you're a 1 >_>

also, there's this thread
http://valentrinne.com/boyah/index.php?topic=18421.0

TOPIC:  If you buy me one these I will have sex with you.
"And I don't care if it's gay sex, that's how happy I will be."

Rius

Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic.  I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories.  But that can't be right.  I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys.  I just don't see how that's possible.  Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females.  So how does this logic actually validate itself?  Seriously. 

If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so.  Until then, I stand.
I don't think you're a 3, but almost all people have a natural attraction towards members of the same sex, even indirect sexual attraction. Aggressiveness tends to be somewhat sexually attractive to men, and lookies at all of the sports. :P

Syncopathic


Bowser81889

Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:03:39 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic.  I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories.  But that can't be right.  I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys.  I just don't see how that's possible.  Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females.  So how does this logic actually validate itself?  Seriously. 

If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so.  Until then, I stand.
I don't think you're a 3, but almost all people have a natural attraction towards members of the same sex, even indirect sexual attraction. Aggressiveness tends to be somewhat sexually attractive to men, and lookies at all of the sports. :P

Whoah. o__O  I never even thought of it that way. o__o  Funny how you think one thing, but all along it could really be interpreted another way.  Insane.  I guess that is pretty normal, and kind of cool. :P  In a creepy kind of way, of course. xD

Jono2

Well, I have nothing wrong with homosexuals, let them choose what they want.

but I'm definitely not a homosexual. o_O

Quote from: LinkXLR on January 30, 2008, 09:10:54 PM
Quote from: famy on January 30, 2008, 08:36:30 PM
is big willy unleashed a will smith game

...I'm not even gonna touch this one.

SteamID: Lazylen

Rius

Quote from: Jono2 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:53 PM
Well, I have nothing wrong with homosexuals, let them choose what they want.

but I'm definitely not a homosexual. o_O

Reaction formation defense mechanism. j/k :P


Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:24 PM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:03:39 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic.  I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories.  But that can't be right.  I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys.  I just don't see how that's possible.  Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females.  So how does this logic actually validate itself?  Seriously. 

If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so.  Until then, I stand.
I don't think you're a 3, but almost all people have a natural attraction towards members of the same sex, even indirect sexual attraction. Aggressiveness tends to be somewhat sexually attractive to men, and lookies at all of the sports. :P

Whoah. o__O  I never even thought of it that way. o__o  Funny how you think one thing, but all along it could really be interpreted another way.  Insane.  I guess that is pretty normal, and kind of cool. :P  In a creepy kind of way, of course. xD
Yeah, people are awesome. :P

Bowser81889

Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:17:06 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:53 PM
Well, I have nothing wrong with homosexuals, let them choose what they want.

but I'm definitely not a homosexual. o_O

Reaction formation defense mechanism. j/k :P


Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:24 PM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:03:39 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic.  I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories.  But that can't be right.  I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys.  I just don't see how that's possible.  Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females.  So how does this logic actually validate itself?  Seriously. 

If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so.  Until then, I stand.
I don't think you're a 3, but almost all people have a natural attraction towards members of the same sex, even indirect sexual attraction. Aggressiveness tends to be somewhat sexually attractive to men, and lookies at all of the sports. :P

Whoah. o__O  I never even thought of it that way. o__o  Funny how you think one thing, but all along it could really be interpreted another way.  Insane.  I guess that is pretty normal, and kind of cool. :P  In a creepy kind of way, of course. xD
Yeah, people are awesome. :P

Strangely enough, yes. :)  So are the laws of chemistry. xD

Rius

Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 09:18:35 PM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:17:06 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:53 PM
Well, I have nothing wrong with homosexuals, let them choose what they want.

but I'm definitely not a homosexual. o_O

Reaction formation defense mechanism. j/k :P


Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:24 PM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:03:39 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic.  I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories.  But that can't be right.  I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys.  I just don't see how that's possible.  Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females.  So how does this logic actually validate itself?  Seriously. 

If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so.  Until then, I stand.
I don't think you're a 3, but almost all people have a natural attraction towards members of the same sex, even indirect sexual attraction. Aggressiveness tends to be somewhat sexually attractive to men, and lookies at all of the sports. :P

Whoah. o__O  I never even thought of it that way. o__o  Funny how you think one thing, but all along it could really be interpreted another way.  Insane.  I guess that is pretty normal, and kind of cool. :P  In a creepy kind of way, of course. xD
Yeah, people are awesome. :P

Strangely enough, yes. :)  So are the laws of chemistry. xD
Don't get me started on chemistry...
O' Dear God, stoichiometry, redox, molarity, the MOLE!!! All hail Avagadro's number! And organic chemistry, yesh! Electrochem. Oh yes!

Bowser81889

Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:34:35 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 09:18:35 PM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:17:06 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:53 PM
Well, I have nothing wrong with homosexuals, let them choose what they want.

but I'm definitely not a homosexual. o_O

Reaction formation defense mechanism. j/k :P


Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:24 PM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:03:39 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic.  I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories.  But that can't be right.  I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys.  I just don't see how that's possible.  Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females.  So how does this logic actually validate itself?  Seriously. 

If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so.  Until then, I stand.
I don't think you're a 3, but almost all people have a natural attraction towards members of the same sex, even indirect sexual attraction. Aggressiveness tends to be somewhat sexually attractive to men, and lookies at all of the sports. :P

Whoah. o__O  I never even thought of it that way. o__o  Funny how you think one thing, but all along it could really be interpreted another way.  Insane.  I guess that is pretty normal, and kind of cool. :P  In a creepy kind of way, of course. xD
Yeah, people are awesome. :P

Strangely enough, yes. :)  So are the laws of chemistry. xD
Don't get me started on chemistry...
O' Dear God, stoichiometry, redox, molarity, the MOLE!!! All hail Avagadro's number! And organic chemistry, yesh! Electrochem. Oh yes!

xDDDDDDDDDDDDDdd

Mystic