Why? Because I say so.
Nevermind, Wikipedia helped me.
I actually consider myself either a 0 or 1.
You fool, how dare you rate me a 3. >:(
I'm at least a 13.
Rating Description
0 Exclusively heterosexual
1 Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2 Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3 Equally heterosexual and homosexual
4 Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5 Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6 Exclusively homosexual
X Asexual
This confused me at first, but then I figured it out after Silver posted that chart.
Coincidentally, it seems as though ME holds a valid point. Definitely can't argue there.
I'm a 6 ^_^
I'm an X, thank you very much.
You wish.
I'm a 0.
Yo' mama is a X.
I'm a zero ;D
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic. I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories. But that can't be right. I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys. I just don't see how that's possible. Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females. So how does this logic actually validate itself? Seriously.
If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so. Until then, I stand.
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic. I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories. But that can't be right. I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys. I just don't see how that's possible. Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females. So how does this logic actually validate itself? Seriously.
If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so. Until then, I stand.
There IS no logic, this is a joke thread ;D
Quote from: Logheck on November 13, 2007, 08:33:04 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic. I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories. But that can't be right. I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys. I just don't see how that's possible. Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females. So how does this logic actually validate itself? Seriously.
If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so. Until then, I stand.
There IS no logic, this is a joke thread ;D
Ah, okay. :P
wth is a three?
Quote from: LiveOnTheEdge on November 13, 2007, 08:40:53 PM
wth is a three?
A completely bisexual person with equal preference in both genders.
Quote from: bluaki on November 13, 2007, 08:43:23 PM
Quote from: LiveOnTheEdge on November 13, 2007, 08:40:53 PM
wth is a three?
A completely bisexual person with equal preference in both genders.
I was wondering what the heck that meant. Only thing is, I doubt most people on here are threes. :P
quizfarm said im a zero
Quote from: JMV290 on November 13, 2007, 08:46:03 PM
quizfarm said im a zero
I'd say you're a 1 >_>
also, there's this thread
http://valentrinne.com/boyah/index.php?topic=18421.0
TOPIC: If you buy me one these I will have sex with you.
"And I don't care if it's gay sex, that's how happy I will be."
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic. I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories. But that can't be right. I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys. I just don't see how that's possible. Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females. So how does this logic actually validate itself? Seriously.
If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so. Until then, I stand.
I don't think you're a 3, but almost all people have a natural attraction towards members of the same sex, even indirect sexual attraction. Aggressiveness tends to be somewhat sexually attractive to men, and lookies at all of the sports. :P
zero for me pl0x
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:03:39 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic. I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories. But that can't be right. I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys. I just don't see how that's possible. Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females. So how does this logic actually validate itself? Seriously.
If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so. Until then, I stand.
I don't think you're a 3, but almost all people have a natural attraction towards members of the same sex, even indirect sexual attraction. Aggressiveness tends to be somewhat sexually attractive to men, and lookies at all of the sports. :P
Whoah. o__O I never even thought of it that way. o__o Funny how you think one thing, but all along it could really be interpreted another way. Insane. I guess that is pretty normal, and kind of cool. :P In a creepy kind of way, of course. xD
Well, I have nothing wrong with homosexuals, let them choose what they want.
but I'm definitely not a homosexual. o_O
Quote from: Jono2 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:53 PM
Well, I have nothing wrong with homosexuals, let them choose what they want.
but I'm definitely not a homosexual. o_O
Reaction formation defense mechanism. j/k :P
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:24 PM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:03:39 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic. I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories. But that can't be right. I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys. I just don't see how that's possible. Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females. So how does this logic actually validate itself? Seriously.
If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so. Until then, I stand.
I don't think you're a 3, but almost all people have a natural attraction towards members of the same sex, even indirect sexual attraction. Aggressiveness tends to be somewhat sexually attractive to men, and lookies at all of the sports. :P
Whoah. o__O I never even thought of it that way. o__o Funny how you think one thing, but all along it could really be interpreted another way. Insane. I guess that is pretty normal, and kind of cool. :P In a creepy kind of way, of course. xD
Yeah, people are awesome. :P
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:17:06 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:53 PM
Well, I have nothing wrong with homosexuals, let them choose what they want.
but I'm definitely not a homosexual. o_O
Reaction formation defense mechanism. j/k :P
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:24 PM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:03:39 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic. I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories. But that can't be right. I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys. I just don't see how that's possible. Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females. So how does this logic actually validate itself? Seriously.
If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so. Until then, I stand.
I don't think you're a 3, but almost all people have a natural attraction towards members of the same sex, even indirect sexual attraction. Aggressiveness tends to be somewhat sexually attractive to men, and lookies at all of the sports. :P
Whoah. o__O I never even thought of it that way. o__o Funny how you think one thing, but all along it could really be interpreted another way. Insane. I guess that is pretty normal, and kind of cool. :P In a creepy kind of way, of course. xD
Yeah, people are awesome. :P
Strangely enough, yes. :) So are the laws of chemistry. xD
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 09:18:35 PM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:17:06 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:53 PM
Well, I have nothing wrong with homosexuals, let them choose what they want.
but I'm definitely not a homosexual. o_O
Reaction formation defense mechanism. j/k :P
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:24 PM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:03:39 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic. I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories. But that can't be right. I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys. I just don't see how that's possible. Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females. So how does this logic actually validate itself? Seriously.
If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so. Until then, I stand.
I don't think you're a 3, but almost all people have a natural attraction towards members of the same sex, even indirect sexual attraction. Aggressiveness tends to be somewhat sexually attractive to men, and lookies at all of the sports. :P
Whoah. o__O I never even thought of it that way. o__o Funny how you think one thing, but all along it could really be interpreted another way. Insane. I guess that is pretty normal, and kind of cool. :P In a creepy kind of way, of course. xD
Yeah, people are awesome. :P
Strangely enough, yes. :) So are the laws of chemistry. xD
Don't get me started on chemistry...
O' Dear God, stoichiometry, redox, molarity, the MOLE!!! All hail Avagadro's number! And organic chemistry, yesh! Electrochem. Oh yes!
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:34:35 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 09:18:35 PM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:17:06 PM
Quote from: Jono2 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:53 PM
Well, I have nothing wrong with homosexuals, let them choose what they want.
but I'm definitely not a homosexual. o_O
Reaction formation defense mechanism. j/k :P
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 09:08:24 PM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:03:39 PM
Quote from: Bowser81889 on November 13, 2007, 08:28:17 PM
Wait....now I seem to see a flaw in ME's logic. I thought that in general, a 3 applied to most of the NSF population being divided up into those two categories. But that can't be right. I don't see how I can personally be a 3, considering I've never seen myself as leaning towards liking guys. I just don't see how that's possible. Sure, I've never dated anyone, but I've never had feelings for anyone but females. So how does this logic actually validate itself? Seriously.
If my own logic can be corrected, then please do so. Until then, I stand.
I don't think you're a 3, but almost all people have a natural attraction towards members of the same sex, even indirect sexual attraction. Aggressiveness tends to be somewhat sexually attractive to men, and lookies at all of the sports. :P
Whoah. o__O I never even thought of it that way. o__o Funny how you think one thing, but all along it could really be interpreted another way. Insane. I guess that is pretty normal, and kind of cool. :P In a creepy kind of way, of course. xD
Yeah, people are awesome. :P
Strangely enough, yes. :) So are the laws of chemistry. xD
Don't get me started on chemistry...
O' Dear God, stoichiometry, redox, molarity, the MOLE!!! All hail Avagadro's number! And organic chemistry, yesh! Electrochem. Oh yes!
xDDDDDDDDDDDDDdd
Yeah, I'm definitely on the border of being a 1 or a 2. ::)
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:34:35 PM
O' Dear God, stoichiometry, redox, molarity, the MOLE!!! All hail Avagadro's number! And organic chemistry, yesh! Electrochem. Oh yes!
It may be fun now, Nin, but it isn't going to be so rosy in college. Labs are long and tough. Gen chem is alright, but organic chem is
extremely tough stuff. I was an A student in Gen Chem, I'm currently at a C- in Organic. :p
I consider myself a 1, because I actually have pondered being gay.
Quote from: PsychoYoshi on November 14, 2007, 12:14:03 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:34:35 PM
O' Dear God, stoichiometry, redox, molarity, the MOLE!!! All hail Avagadro's number! And organic chemistry, yesh! Electrochem. Oh yes!
It may be fun now, Nin, but it isn't going to be so rosy in college. Labs are long and tough. Gen chem is alright, but organic chem is extremely tough stuff. I was an A student in Gen Chem, I'm currently at a C- in Organic. :p
I never said it was easy, but it's my best subject along with Computer Science. I know its hard: I'm in AP Chemistry, and this was the first year I made a 'B' on an exam. D:
Quote from: bluaki on November 13, 2007, 08:52:11 PM
Quote from: JMV290 on November 13, 2007, 08:46:03 PM
quizfarm said im a zero
I'd say you're a 1 >_>
also, there's this thread
http://valentrinne.com/boyah/index.php?topic=18421.0
TOPIC: If you buy me one these I will have sex with you.
"And I don't care if it's gay sex, that's how happy I will be."
yes. i want a cadillac
@Mystic: ZGDK is an X
I'm an X
LOL j/k I suppress my feelings I would say I'm about a 1 or 2.
I'm a 1 or 2, I guess.
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 14, 2007, 06:33:18 AM
Quote from: PsychoYoshi on November 14, 2007, 12:14:03 AM
Quote from: NINNIN6 on November 13, 2007, 09:34:35 PM
O' Dear God, stoichiometry, redox, molarity, the MOLE!!! All hail Avagadro's number! And organic chemistry, yesh! Electrochem. Oh yes!
It may be fun now, Nin, but it isn't going to be so rosy in college. Labs are long and tough. Gen chem is alright, but organic chem is extremely tough stuff. I was an A student in Gen Chem, I'm currently at a C- in Organic. :p
I never said it was easy, but it's my best subject along with Computer Science. I know its hard: I'm in AP Chemistry, and this was the first year I made a 'B' on an exam. D:
Ick, tough class from what I've heard. Good hunting to you.
1 probably...
or 0.